個案總覽
依發行單位、學門或關鍵字,找到適合的教學個案。
-
Intellectual Property and Strategy
Explores the role of intellectual property in firms' strategies. Explains the legal and strategic differences between patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets and explores the multiple ways firms use these different legal protections to gain competitive advantage in the marketplace. -
Strategic Inflection: TiVo in 2003 (B), Spreadsheet
Spreadsheet for use with case (9-704-429). Download Only. (Examines the possibility of TIVo being a content distributor). -
Strategic Inflection: TiVo in 2003 (B)
Supplements the (A) case. -
Strategic Inflection: TiVo in 2003 (A)
Mike Ramsey, TiVo's CEO, must decide on which direction to build the company. Facing an onslaught of new competitors, a huge opportunity in the cable industry, and the possibility of becoming the new "user interface" for TV entertainment, Ramsey must balance the demands for profitability with the hope of driving TiVo to mass adoption. -
Wintel (A): Cooperation or Conflict
Examines the dynamic relationship between two complementors: Intel and Microsoft. Set in 1995, the case asks how Intel and Microsoft should solve a serious division between the two companies that threatens the health of the PC industry. -
Wintel (B): From NSP to MMX
Supplements the (A) case. -
Wintel (C): From MMX to the Internet
Supplements the (A) case. -
Wintel (D): From the Internet to Multi-Market Coordination
Supplements the (A) case. -
Wintel (E): From Multi-Market Contact to Multi-Geographic Contact
Supplements the (A) case. -
Intel Corp.--1968-2003
Describes three stages in Intel's history: the initial success and then collapse in DRAMs and EPROMs, its transition to and dominance in microprocessors, and its move to become the main supplier of the building blocks for the Internet economy. Allows a rich discussion of industry structure and transformation in DRAMs and microprocessors, creation of competitive advantage and value capture, and sustainability. -
Intel Corp.--1968-2003, Spreadsheet Supplement
Spreadsheet supplement for case 703-427. -
AOL Europe vs. Freeserve (A)
AOL Europe must decide how to respond to Freeserve, a free Internet Service Provider (ISP) that has signed up 1.6 million British customers in its first six months. After becoming the leading ISP in the United States, AOL has formed a joint venture with Bertelsmann to expand into Europe. By early 1999, the new company, AOL Europe, has 2.6 million subscribers, but it has fallen behind the market leaders in Germany, France, and now, the United Kingdom. This case asks how AOL Europe should respond to the Freeserve challenge and provides information on the economics of ISPs, AOL, Europe's history and growth, and the U.K. regulatory environment to help students frame their responses. A rewritten version of an earlier case. -
AOL Europe vs. Freeserve (B)
Supplements the (A) case. A rewritten version of an earlier supplement. -
AOL Europe vs. Freeserve (C)
Supplements the (A) case. A rewritten version of an earlier supplement. -
Gucci Group N.V. (C)
Supplements the (A) case. -
Wal-Mart in 2002
In its first quarter of 2002, Wal-Mart became the largest company on the globe (by sales) and expanded into Japan. Was the giant retailer unstoppable? This case explores Wal-Mart's top issues in fueling top- and bottom-line growth: diversification into groceries, new retail channels such as the Neighborhood Markets, and continued international expansion. -
Apple Computer--2002
In 1980, Apple was the leader of the personal computer industry, but by 2002 it had suffered heavy losses at the hands of the Wintel camp. This case examines Apple's strategic moves as the PC industry evolves in the 21st century and poses the question: Can Steve Jobs make Apple "insanely great" again? -
Apple Computer--2002, Spreadsheet Supplement
Spreadsheet supplement for case 702-469. -
Cola Wars Continue: Coke vs. Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century
Examines the industry structure and competitive strategy of Coca-cola and Pepsi over 100 years of rivalry. New challenges of the 21st century included boosting flagging domestic cola sales and finding new revenue streams. Both firms also began to modify their bottling, pricing, and brand strategies. They looked to emerging international markets to fuel growth and broaden their brand portfolios to include noncarbonated beverages like tea, juice, sports drinks, and bottled water. For over a century, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola had vied for the "throat share" of the world's beverage market. The most intense battles of the cola wars were fought over the $60 billion industry in the United States, where the average American consumes 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) per year. In a "carefully waged competitive struggle," from 1975 to 1995 both Coke and Pepsi had achieved average annual growth of around 10% as both U.S. and worldwide CSD consumption consistently rose. This cozy situation was threatened in the late 1990s, however, when U.S. CSD consumption dropped for two consecutive years and worldwide shipments slowed for both Coke and Pepsi. The case considers whether Coke's and Pepsi's era of sustained growth and profitability was coming to a close or whether this apparent slowdown was just another blip in the course of a century of enviable performance. A rewritten version of an earlier case by Michael E. Porter and David B. Yoffie. -
Cola Wars Continue: Coke vs. Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century, Spreadsheet Supplement
Spreadsheet supplement for case 702-442.