The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) had invited proposals for developing an Information Technology (IT) Park near the township of Panchkula in northern India. Sreeni Iyer, a partner at AMII Advisors, was considering a bid for this project in partnership with LIRA Developers, a public company. The fact that the Haryana state government had initiated this project suggested that regulatory approvals would not be a hurdle. However, the exit price and exit options needed to be carefully assessed by Iyer and his team.

The case describes a situation facing Mikul Patel and Rahul Mirdha, the co-founders of Moodcafe, an online mental healthcare service provider. They had to choose between the two angel investors and negotiate the terms and conditions for funding their start-up. In September 2018, they started Moodcafe to provide services to people struggling with mental health issues. The case mentions several crucial decisions in a start-up's journey that are related to "minimum viable product", "adding more features to the platform", "proof-of-concept testing of the product in the market", "building a core team" and "deciding on equity division between the co-founders". The co-founders need to raise funds from angel investors to test the product at the country level. They need to choose between the two angel investors and decide the terms and conditions of seeking investment.

This case is written from the perspective of a decision-maker at a private equity investment fund. The case is set in India, where a large corpus of capital sourced from the United States was deployed from the early 2000s onwards. It looks at the manner in which a private equity real estate fund evaluates the implications of RERA in India, in particular, the continuation vs. exit decision when a project encounters obstacles that delay its completion.