個案總覽

In 2010, approximately 20,000 barrels of oil being shipped south by Enbridge spilled into Michigan's Talmadge Creek, contaminating wetlands around Battle Creek and the nearby county seat of Marshall, including a stretch of the Kalamazoo River. The timing of the incident could not have been worse. The pipeline had been carrying controversial tar sands oil at a time when Enbridge and its competitors were seeking to greatly expand their pipeline networks across North America. Moreover, the pipeline failure came on the heels of BP's much larger oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, amid a period of heightened public intolerance toward oil spills. As a result, Enbridge faced massive public relations (PR) and regulatory challenges. Enbridge's reputation was clearly at risk since the company had promoted itself as a true believer in corporate social responsibility, which had raised the stakes when dealing with the industrial accident. The CEO of Enbridge faced an almost impossible challenge. He needed to prove to American citizens - and to industry regulators, market watchers, company shareholders and Enbridge employees - that his company deserved to be judged on its own merits, not as a Canadian version of BP. To meet this challenge, he needed to demonstrate that Enbridge was run by people who not only wanted to make amends but could be trusted to do so.

Supplement for W12279

Noel Biderman was the president of Avid Life Media, a profitable Canadian growth company whose main business was various online social networks for targeted groups seeking sexual partners and romance. Biderman was seeking to raise $60 million via a private placement offering to acquire a privately held online advertising sales company, merge the companies and take the new and improved growth story public on the TSX Venture Exchange or the Toronto Stock Exchange. The Avid Life offering represented a legal and potentially lucrative investment. Nevertheless, only one investment bank (GMP Capital) was willing to help Biderman raise capital - because among the various social networks Avid Life owns is the notorious Ashley Madison online community for married people seeking to commit adultery. GMP's relationship was short-lived; after media coverage of the Avid Life offering started to focus on the bank's willingness to service Biderman's company, GMP withdrew their support from Biderman. Perhaps attributable to the bank's desire to avoid being seen in public with someone known, rightly or wrongly, as the king of infidelity, GMP's withdrawn support left Biderman unable to take a potentially lucrative investment opportunity to market.

In 2010, GMP Capital (GMP) found itself the only investment bank willing to raise capital for Avid Life Media, the parent company of the controversial Ashley Madison online community for married people seeking to commit adultery. Since its inception in 1995, GMP had made a name for itself as a bold deal maker and not afraid to complete "bet-the-firm" transactions. With large profit potential, morality wasn't always an issue when sex-based business plans were being promoted. Yet after facing negative publicity, GMP subsequently withdrew from the deal. How did GMP end up on the wrong side of a line other firms refused to cross?