個案總覽

When bad things happen, most of us have a gut reaction. Psychological resilience-the capacity to respond quickly and constructively in a crisis-can be hard to muster when a manager is paralyzed by fear, anger, confusion, or a tendency to assign blame. Resilient managers are able to shift quickly from endlessly dissecting traumatic events to looking forward, determining the best course of action given new realities. They understand the size and scope of the crisis and the levels of control and impact they may have in a bad situation. The authors present a regimen for boosting personal resilience that begins with recognizing four dimensions of an adverse event- influence, impact, breadth, and duration-and continues with a series of pointed questions designed to get managers out of their own heads. Specifying questions help them identify particular points of intervention when dealing with a crisis. Visualizing questions help them look beyond problems and toward actual solutions. Collaborating questions inspire them to reach out to others, not for affirmation of wrongdoing, or commiseration, but for assistance. Managers can use these questions to tamp down unproductive responses to adversity, to replace negativity with creativity and resourcefulness, and to get things done despite real or perceived obstacles.

A lot of people have blamed short-term thinking for causing our current economic troubles, which has set off a debate about what time window we should use to assess a CEO's performance. Today boards of directors, senior managers, and investors intensely want to know how CEOs handle the ups and downs of running businesses over an extended period. Many executive compensation plans define the "long term" as a three-year horizon, but the real test of a CEO's leadership has to be how the company does over his or her full tenure. This article contains a list of the 50 CEOs of large public companies who performed best over their entire time in office-or, for those still in the job, up until September 30, 2009. To compile the results, the authors collected data on close to 2,000 CEOs worldwide. They asked, Who had led firms that, on the basis of stock returns, outperformed other firms in the same country and industry? The ranking combines three measures: country-adjusted return, industry-adjusted return, and change in market capitalization during tenure. While it may come as no shock that Steve Jobs of Apple tops the list, the ranking does contains a few surprises. You'll see some relatively unknown faces at the top. The inverse is also true: Some obvious candidates based on reputation don't make the top 50. The authors' analysis of the factors that increased the likelihood that an executive would place high in the ranking turned up a few more surprises. Although one might expect context to have a big effect, they found a wide diversity of countries and industries represented in the top performers. The CEO's background did matter, however, as did the situation left behind by his or her predecessor.

The average baby boomer switches jobs 10 times in his or her career. Though such moves are just about inevitable, they're seldom easy-and they often lead to a noticeable decline in both short- and long-term performance. That's because people make them for the wrong reasons. Drawing on an extensive survey of executive search consultants, as well as surveys of HR heads and interviews with C-level executives around the world, the authors have identified senior managers' five most common career missteps: not doing enough research, leaving for money, going "from" rather than "to," overestimating yourself, and thinking short term. These mistakes follow predictable patterns and persist throughout the course of a career; they're often a direct result of psychological, social, and time pressures. What if you do take the wrong job? The authors' research indicates that you should cut your losses and leave. But fleeing to another bad situation is not the answer. Make your next move strategically-and wherever you are in the search process, don't hesitate to go down another road when it becomes evident that a certain kind of change wouldn't be right.

Dan Sestak has had a charmed career path at packaged-foods giant NutriSelect. But when the CEO unexpectedly passes away just months after Dan is tapped as his successor, he finds himself thrust into the role before he feels ready. Two experts comment on this fictional case study in R1001N and R1001Z. Commentator Bruce Chizen, former CEO of Adobe, remembers what it's like to step into big shoes and advises Dan to acknowledge his weaknesses and reach out to his top team for guidance. Executive coach Debra Benton proposes a few strategic firings to show detractors that Dan means business.

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has made a career of arriving in positions of power during difficult times and, critics say, without the requisite experience. HBR talks to Dr. Rice about making transitions between sectors, managing without management experience, and relearning lessons in new contexts.

Dan Sestak has had a charmed career path at packaged-foods giant NutriSelect. But when the CEO unexpectedly passes away just months after Dan is tapped as his successor, he finds himself thrust into the role before he feels ready. Two experts comment on this fictional case study in R1001N and R1001Z. Commentator Bruce Chizen, former CEO of Adobe, remembers what it's like to step into big shoes and advises Dan to acknowledge his weaknesses and reach out to his top team for guidance. Executive coach Debra Benton proposes a few strategic firings to show detractors that Dan means business.

Dan Sestak has had a charmed career path at packaged-foods giant NutriSelect. But when the CEO unexpectedly passes away just months after Dan is tapped as his successor, he finds himself thrust into the role before he feels ready. Two experts comment on this fictional case study in R1001N and R1001Z. Commentator Bruce Chizen, former CEO of Adobe, remembers what it's like to step into big shoes and advises Dan to acknowledge his weaknesses and reach out to his top team for guidance. Executive coach Debra Benton proposes a few strategic firings to show detractors that Dan means business.

MBA education has come under heavy criticism in recent years. The author argues that much of the criticism is fair, though superficial, focusing on the extent of ethics training or the lack of real-world experience embedded in MBA programs. The real problem, he says, is that MBA programs fail to prepare graduates to make smart decisions in the face of complexity and ambiguity. At its root, the reason MBA programs fail to produce better thinkers is structural, and it runs across three dimensions: where the curriculum's content should be deep, it is shallow; where it should be broad, it is narrow; and where it should be dynamic, it is static. The author shows how each of the three elements of a '3D' MBA is being developed at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto.

In recent years, designers have been applying their skills to a host of problems that were once the territory of business strategists and approached through analysis. With this shift has come the realization that a design-based approach, or 'design thinking', is well suited to tackling some of the most complex challenges organizations face. The authors, both of whom work for renowned design firm IDEO, argue that the first step is for managers to understand the differences in the ways that they and designers go about solving problems. Managers, they say, tend to follow a very analytical process, making decisions by understanding all of the available options and rigorously determining the best path forward. In contrast, designers prototype and iterate ideas, learning as they go and often developing new ideas and understanding of the problem along the way. They detail the designer's approach - which includes embracing constraints and 'building to decide', showing how this leads to 'evolution through design'.

A large body of research shows that people prefer 'smaller, sooner' payoffs to 'larger, later' payoffs when the smaller payoffs are imminent, i.e. when the 'sooner' of the 'smaller' is pretty close to 'right now'. However, when both payoffs are distant in the future, people tend to prefer the larger payoff, even though the time lag from the smaller to the larger payoff would be the same as before. In other words, something, somewhere makes people 'flip' their preferences. The author argues that this human tendency - called Hyperbolic Discounting -- is equally prevalent in senior management teams, and that it manifests itself in various types of behavior, including 'itches', addictions, delusions, sellouts and 'Utopian dystopias'.

This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. The country's largest corporations have hit a road bump on their way toward factoring sustainability into their transportation choices. Despite pressures from customers and investors -and the prospect of evervolatile energy costs -just 9% of Fortune 500 companies include environmental goals in their public documents. A study of those 44 companies reveals some of the best practices that can help a business go the distance, ultimately working with its partners to rethink its entire transportation infrastructure. Companies must demonstrate three distinct levels of integration before they can embed the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions into their transportation strategies: establishing a foundation (acknowledging the problem), changing internal company practices (building an environmentally aware culture) and impacting supply chain practices (such as better vehicle utilization or more efficient routing). Within these categories, the tactics need to be measured by carefully calibrated metrics that can track both environmental and financial progress. As employees begin adapting their own decision making to the new priority -by, for instance, choosing videoconferencing instead of traveling -executives should spread such success stories, reinforcing the institutional preference.

Bertelsmann's EVP HR Immanuel Hermreck and his team were focused on four key HR issues. Three of these were somewhat discreet: improving Bertelsmann's employer brand; managing Bertelsmann talent across the firm's decentralized businesses; and ensuring early identification and appropriate development of Bertelsmann's top 100 high potential managers (hi-pos) to better seed the company's future top management. The fourth issue-recruitment and retention-played an integral role across all three challenges and had to be strengthened and made consistent across the firm, not an easy prospect given Bertelsmann's highly decentralized structure. Hermreck knew navigating these issues would pose significant challenges, but getting them right was critical to Bertelsmann's competitive advantage and survival as a robust media company. He had some good results in from his early efforts, but as he looked forward, what should his action plan set out to do?

Steve & Barry's grew rapidly in the mid-2000s, transitioning from a chain of small stores selling inexpensive collegiate-branded merchandise near university campuses into a $1 billion mall-based giant selling a wide variety of low-priced, celebrity-endorsed apparel. While the company had a wide following, elements of its growth strategy-potentially exacerbated by economic conditions-contributed to its quick downfall. By 2008 Steve & Barry's had declared bankruptcy, and various private equity firms were investigating whether some or all of the company should be saved. This requires analyzing the underlying business strategy pursued by Steve & Barry's before and after its growth phase and specifically diagnosing the explanations for its failure.

By early 2009 Starbucks had nearly 17,000 stores worldwide, with about a third of these outside the United States. Despite multibillion-dollar annual revenues, the giant coffee retailer's yearly growth had declined by half, quarterly earnings had dropped as much as 97 percent, same-store sales were negative, and its stock price was languishing. Factors such as a global economic downturn and increasing competition in the specialty coffee market from large players such as McDonald's and Dunkin' Donuts had driven this decline, resulting in the closings of hundreds of domestic stores already, with many more planned. Founder Howard Schultz, who had recently returned as CEO, and his executive team were convinced that Starbucks's growth opportunities lay overseas, where the firm already had a strong foothold in markets like Japan and the United Kingdom and was preparing to open hundreds of new stores in a variety of locations. But recent international challenges, including the closing of most Australian stores due to sluggish sales, made clear that Starbucks had more to learn about bringing its value proposition-a combination of premium coffee, superior service, and a "coffeehouse experience"-to foreign soil. The key question was not whether Starbucks could transport its value proposition overseas, but how the value proposition's three elements would play in recently entered and new markets. And the stakes of making the right international moves rose with each U.S. store closure. Schultz and his team also faced a broader question, one that applied to both their U.S. and foreign stores: Could they "grow big and stay small," remaining a huge retailer that delivered both high-quality products and a consistently intimate and enjoyable experience to consumers worldwide? This case presents this challenge in the context of Starbucks's history, well-established value proposition, and domestic and international growth and vision.

The case depicts Krispy Kreme's franchise system growth and decline as a lesson to entrepreneurs running a company as a franchisor. Burton D. Cohen, retired senior vice president and chief franchise officer for McDonald's Corporation from 1980 to 1999, explains the strengths and weaknesses in Krispy Kreme's franchising strategy during the period from 1997 to 2006. Areas examined in the case include: franchisee agreements, accounting practices, volatility in stock valuation, franchise system growth, franchise ownership structure, product distribution strategy, and commissary growth. The case depicts how Krispy Kreme started and how it ended up in a low point.

In 2009 Wikia was the Internet's largest for-profit provider of hosted open-source wikis, with over a million daily users. After five years of existence, the organization had supported a wide range of exploratory activities, experiencing both success and failure. With approximately $3 million of cash on hand, Wikia turned cash flow positive in 2009, with revenues of approximately $4.5 million, affording it time and flexibility to try new things. Some of the company's employees and investors suggested that Wikia should attempt to expand and market itself more aggressively, but which strategic direction should receive priority? The case presents many of the issues and tradeoffs facing CEO Gil Penchina as he formulates these priorities.

Peace and harmony are overrated. Though conflict-free teamwork is often held up as the be-all and end-all of organizational life, it actually can be the worst thing to ever happen to a company. Look at Lehman Brothers. When Dick Fuld took over, he transformed a notoriously contentious workplace into one of Wall Street's most harmonious firms. But his efforts backfired - directors and managers became too agreeable, afraid to rock the boat by pointing out that the firm was heading into a crisis. Research shows that the single greatest predictor of poor company performance is complacency, which is why every organization needs a healthy dose of dissent. Not all kinds of conflict are productive, of course - companies need to find the right balance of alignment and competition and make sure that people's energies are pointed in a positive direction. In this article, two seasoned business advisers lay down ground rules for the right kinds of fights. First, the stakes must be worthwhile: The issue should involve a noble purpose or create noticeable - preferably game-changing - value. Next, good fights focus on the future; they're never about placing blame for the past. And it's critical for leaders to keep fights sportsmanlike, allow informal give-and-take in the trenches, and help soften the blow for the losing parties.

In chaotic times like these, an executive's instinct may be to strive for greater efficiency by tightening control. At least two companies, CSC Germany and ANADIGICS, have done the opposite - to impressive effect.

Research shows that if a CEO focuses primarily on maximizing profit, employees' view of the organization will suffer.

Key topics include team design, team management, job design, employee empowerment, implementing change, and high performance workforces. In 2004, John Amasi, the director of production for a manufacturer of plastic pipe, introduced the concept of self-directed teams into a newly rehabbed plant in Corpus Christi, Texas. This was a major departure for RL Wolfe, whose other plants were unionized and rigidly hierarchical. By 2007, Corpus Christi is significantly outperforming the other plants in productivity, and Amasi tours the plant to identify remaining barriers to even higher productivity. Although the tour makes clear that many things are going right, it also reveals specific elements of the SDT concept that are not working optimally; some of these are communicated from the perspective of the workers themselves. At the end of the case, as Amasi sketches out ideas for increasing productivity at Corpus Christi, he also considers how he can persuade the unionized workforces at the other Wolfe plants to accept the SDT model.