個案總覽

Ford Motor Company was concerned that five tug operators, each costing $100,000 annually over three shifts, was too many. Colin Cruji was hired to look into the tug operators and see if Ford could eliminate one or more of the five positions per shift. Colin has now collected some data. How should he use the data he has collected to evaluate the position of tug operator? Does the data support the possibility of eliminating a tug operator without affecting the current level of garbage collection? (This is a sequel to Ford Motor Company and Cruji Management Consulting (A), case 9A99E013.)

Updates Sunrise Medical, Inc.'s Wheelchair Products.

Supplements the (A) case.

Supplements the (A) case.

Supplements the (A) case.

Supplements the (A) case.

Supplements the (A) case.

When Dick Calder is named head of the CIA's Directorate of Administration (DA) in 1995, he faces the task of leading a beleaguered organization through a difficult period. As the unit responsible for providing its more glamorous intelligence-gathering and analyzing counterparts with administrative services-ranging from logistics support to telephones to personnel services-it has borne the brunt of a decade of agency budget cuts. Other directorates are not sympathetic, however, and view the DA as wasteful and unresponsive. In hopes of improving the DA's services and its customers' level of satisfaction, Calder proposes a novel solution to the directorate's woes: budget "givebacks." Under this cost-recovery scheme, the DA would give its budget back to the "mission" directorates, which would then purchase support services from the DA or, if they chose, another provider. Calder reasons that the specter of competition would improve the DA's delivery of services; at the same time, it would encourage the other directorates to buy more prudently, in line with the agency's shrinking service budget, particularly because they would be allowed to retain any savings they realized. It is a radical proposal for an inherently conservative agency-one, moreover, whose covert mission makes unusual demands on the deliverer of the most routine services. This series of organizational change cases follows Calder's efforts to implement budget givebacks in the DA. They detail his strategy for winning support for his idea, the experiences of several pilot giveback programs he initiates, and the sharp resistance he encounters both within the DA and from the other directorates. Together, the cases raise questions about adaptation to a changing political and fiscal environment, as well as the management of innovation in an organization deeply skeptical of change. HKS Case Number 1516.0

When Dick Calder is named head of the CIA's Directorate of Administration (DA) in 1995, he faces the task of leading a beleaguered organization through a difficult period. As the unit responsible for providing its more glamorous intelligence-gathering and analyzing counterparts with administrative services-ranging from logistics support to telephones to personnel services-it has borne the brunt of a decade of agency budget cuts. Other directorates are not sympathetic, however, and view the DA as wasteful and unresponsive. In hopes of improving the DA's services and its customers' level of satisfaction, Calder proposes a novel solution to the directorate's woes: budget "givebacks." Under this cost-recovery scheme, the DA would give its budget back to the "mission" directorates, which would then purchase support services from the DA or, if they chose, another provider. Calder reasons that the specter of competition would improve the DA's delivery of services; at the same time, it would encourage the other directorates to buy more prudently, in line with the agency's shrinking service budget, particularly because they would be allowed to retain any savings they realized. It is a radical proposal for an inherently conservative agency-one, moreover, whose covert mission makes unusual demands on the deliverer of the most routine services. This series of organizational change cases follows Calder's efforts to implement budget givebacks in the DA. They detail his strategy for winning support for his idea, the experiences of several pilot giveback programs he initiates, and the sharp resistance he encounters both within the DA and from the other directorates. Together, the cases raise questions about adaptation to a changing political and fiscal environment, as well as the management of innovation in an organization deeply skeptical of change. HKS Case Number 1516.1

The case describes the internationally known Singapore initiative to implement electronically deducted charges for road use, varying by route, type of vehicle, and time of day. The case highlights the widespread public acceptance of the relatively elaborate and novel pricing regime, following an extensive public information and consultation campaign conducted by Singapore's Land Transport Authority. Useful for those interested in successful public consultation. HKS Case Number 1520.0

Supplements the (A) case.

Supplements the (A) case.

Supplements the (A) case.

Supplements the (A) case.

Presents a first draft of the case, based upon an interview with the case protagonist shown in the video.

Presents feedback from the supervising faculty member on the draft case.

Supplements the (A) case.

The dramatic reduction in crime in New York City during the 1990s grabbed the attention of the U.S. and the world, seeming to provide evidence that new policy and management approaches could make an enormous difference for the better. The main case tells the story of key management decisions that the New York Police Department itself credits with the successful attack on the city's crime rate. This epilogue raises the dramatic question of whether the goal of minimizing the misuse of force by police officers is also amenable to the measurement techniques successfully employed to the activity of criminals. HKS case number 1530.1.

Supplements the (A) case.

Supplements Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.