個案總覽

The case explores the intersection of capital allocation and shareholder activism in the biopharmaceutical industry. As many biopharma companies face looming patent expirations for key medicines, the case asks the question of whether investing in R&D and M&A is an imperative. Three biopharma companies have been under scrutiny by Elliott Management, one of the largest shareholder activists for various reasons. The range of investment options for biopharma companies are outlined, including investing in the business via R&D and M&A, and returning capital to shareholders via dividends and share repurchases. The uniqueness of large biopharma companies is reviewed including enviable profit margins, significant risk in R&D, questionable perpetuity value, and the pressure from shareholder activists to prudently deploy capital.

On June 24, 2021, Keppel Corporation (Keppel) and Sembcorp Marine Limited (Sembmarine) announced that they had signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding to enter into exclusive talks to merge Sembmarine and Keppel Offshore and Marine (Keppel O&M), a division of Keppel. Separately, but on the same day, Sembmarine also announced an intention to raise S$1.5 billion through a three-for-two renounceable rights issue (up to 18.83 billion new shares) at an exercise price of S$0.08 per share, which was a 35.7 per cent discount to the theoretical ex-rights price and a 58.1 per cent discount to the June 23 closing price of S$0.191.<br><br>Based on the share price reaction to the announcement of the restructuring, what was the market’s perception of the merger? Would it create value? Should Sembmarine raise capital via a rights issue and should shareholders subscribe to the rights issue?

Spreadsheet to accompany product W27820.

Finbook Pte. Ltd. (FinBook), a financial technology (fintech) start-up, started in July 2017 in Singapore as a decentralized marketplace for structured products on the blockchain. The founders obtained seed funding of approximately US$200,000 that allowed it to introduce and incorporate structured funds, short sales, and financial options in the crypto space using smart contracts under the distributed ledger system.<br><br>In May 2018, FinBook launched a private cornerstone round of token financing and obtained $3.5 million worth of Ethereum. However, the cryptocurrency market plunged in 2018. As a result, the founders needed to discuss their options: Should they postpone the public initial coin offering (ICO) planned for September 2018, or should they consider another round of venture capital (VC) equity financing while waiting for a better time for the ICO?

A business school student was preparing for a stock pitch competition. He had developed an interest in stock held by investor Warren Buffet in Liberty Media Corp.’s Series C Liberty Formula One common shares. His research revealed that a substantial part of Formula One’s valuation was accounted for as intangible assets and comprised, in particular, what was known as the 100-year agreement with the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile, the sport’s governing body. The student was interested in how such an agreement on paper could be worth billions of dollars and how that translated into value for investors. What factors would—and should—Liberty Media Corp. have considered when attributing a value to an asset such as the 100-year agreement that was ten times higher than its original cost? How should investors view these inflated values for intangible assets such as the 100-year agreement and Formula One’s customer relationships and what would be their impact on Liberty Media Corp.’s earnings and future stock value?

On June 24, 2021, Keppel Corporation (Keppel) and Sembcorp Marine Limited (Sembmarine) announced that they had signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding to enter into exclusive talks to merge Sembmarine and Keppel Offshore and Marine (Keppel O&M), a division of Keppel. Separately, but on the same day, Sembmarine also announced an intention to raise S$1.5 billion through a three-for-two renounceable rights issue (up to 18.83 billion new shares) at an exercise price of S$0.08 per share, which was a 35.7 per cent discount to the theoretical ex-rights price and a 58.1 per cent discount to the June 23 closing price of S$0.191.<br><br>Based on the share price reaction to the announcement of the restructuring, what was the market's perception of the merger? Would it create value? Should Sembmarine raise capital via a rights issue and should shareholders subscribe to the rights issue?

Finbook Pte. Ltd. (FinBook), a financial technology (fintech) start-up, started in July 2017 in Singapore as a decentralized marketplace for structured products on the blockchain. The founders obtained seed funding of approximately US$200,000 that allowed it to introduce and incorporate structured funds, short sales, and financial options in the crypto space using smart contracts under the distributed ledger system. In May 2018, FinBook launched a private cornerstone round of token financing and obtained $3.5 million worth of Ethereum. However, the cryptocurrency market plunged in 2018. As a result, the founders needed to discuss their options: Should they postpone the public initial coin offering (ICO) planned for September 2018, or should they consider another round of venture capital (VC) equity financing while waiting for a better time for the ICO?

Both enterprise blockchain and tokenization projects use distributed ledger technologies (DLT) as the underlying infrastructure; but developing and managing them are in fact very different. This case focuses on CryptoBLK, a Hong Kong-based solution provider that has developed a wide range of DLT software applications for its clients in trade finance, supply chain and logistics, and has later expanded to tokenization businesses. This case gives an opportunity for students to identify and discuss the differences between enterprise blockchain and tokenization projects in terms of client profiles, project goals, required services, time spans, revenue streams and specific programming languages used. Students can learn how to make strategic short-term and long-term decisions. In making short-term decisions, students can consider how to strike a balance between enterprise blockchain and tokenization businesses in terms of investing and staffing. In making long-term decisions, as tokenization is an emerging trend with high potential, students have the opportunity to discuss how CryptoBLK should position itself in the industry, e.g., as an end-to-end tokenization service provider or only as a technical service provider. Moreover, students can consider how CryptoBLK can leverage existing and potential clients in local and regional consortiums, international DLT trade finance consortia and token-specific companies to develop a sustainable business model. After studying this case, students can not only understand the concepts of private and public blockchains but also discuss their differences from a project management perspective. Students will also be able to make strategic decisions on developing business models involving emerging technologies.

In July 2022, Ashley Sudjianto, a partner at Adelaida Technology Capital (ATC), had to make a recommendation to ATC's investment committee on how much money ATC should lend to CarboCaptor Inc., an emerging chemical-manufacturing start-up that had a patented, cost-effective solvent that captured carbon dioxide (CO2) from the air. In late 2021, CarboCaptor had been well on the way to launching a new vertical: chemical compounds to aid CO2 storage in concrete. Now, CarboCaptor's CEO had reached out to ATC for $6.5 million in debt financing, $2.3 million of which was to fund equipment purchases, and $4.2 million of which was to finance CarboCaptor's growth strategy and working capital needs. ATC was a perfect partner to reach out to. An East Coast venture leasing investor, the fund specialized in small-scale biotech and manufacturing equipment financing. It typically acquired these tangible assets and leased them to companies, receiving in return a promise of scheduled payments as well as warrants to purchase start-up stocks. CarboCaptor's equipment needs were exactly what ATC aimed to finance. There was just one catch: CarboCaptor's board of directors had decided to offer ATC its two core patents as collateral for the financing. The patents had 13 years of useful life remaining and were crucial for CarboCaptor's ability to produce its most popular product, CO2 solvent. But ATC had never used patents as collateral for a venture leasing transaction before. On all accounts, CarboCaptor's two core patents were valuable. Could Sudjianto convince her partners to use patents as collateral in exchange for funding the full $6.5 million CarboCaptor had requested? And if she could, what terms and deal structure would be the best to account for the riskiness of the venture?

Spreadsheet Supplement for Case UV8695

<p align=”justify”>US-registered Emerging Markets Development Group (EMDG), a small but successful international consulting firm that provided development assistance in emerging and post-conflict regions, bet big on a project in Southeast Asia in 2008 that was financed by a Small Business Administration (SBA)-guaranteed loan issued by a local bank. The project failed, with catastrophic results. After seven years of attempting to dig themselves out of the hole, the principals were out of cash and needed to either significantly restructure the balance of EMDG’s outstanding loan or shut the firm down. Complicating the situation was the possibility that a former partner, who had left the firm over nine years before, might be held liable for the current debt.</p>

US-registered Emerging Markets Development Group (EMDG), a small but successful international consulting firm that provided development assistance in emerging and post-conflict regions, bet big on a project in Southeast Asia in 2008 that was financed by a Small Business Administration (SBA)-guaranteed loan issued by a local bank. The project failed, with catastrophic results. After seven years of attempting to dig themselves out of the hole, the principals were out of cash and needed to either significantly restructure the balance of EMDG's outstanding loan or shut the firm down. Complicating the situation was the possibility that a former partner, who had left the firm over nine years before, might be held liable for the current debt.

Octavian Graf Pilati, rising generation member of an Austrian princely family, prepared to sell the palace his family had held for over three hundred years. In recent years, the Pilati family lands had been leveraged as loan collateral for an international venture that had become entangled in a case of suspected management fraud. Between banks unwilling to restructure debt obligations, the complexities of multi-jurisdictional legal enforcement, and intransigent family members, Octavian found himself in the impossible position of being tasked with resolving the crisis yet with little formal power to follow through on his designated responsibilities. Realizing he and his family's centuries-long legacy was at an impasse, should the family choose to fully divest its long-held assets in the face of possible financial ruin? Could they bounce back from failure - either in this generation or future ones - or should future generations seek to start anew?

Garen Staglin, Founder and Chairman of One Mind, reflected on his life's work in brain health. As he contemplated stepping down in the next few years, he weighed how to pass along this legacy to his son, Brandon Staglin, the impetus behind and next generation of the family's landmark nonprofit. Founded in response to Brandon's psychotic break in 1990, One Mind confronted the stunning deficits in basic brain health research and care in the United States through research, funding, and public awareness efforts. While Brandon had already taken on much of the responsibility for the organization in his capacity as One Mind's President, the organization's board might still choose another candidate as his successor. On a professional level, would Brandon's authenticity as someone who was personally impacted by mental illness lend the organization greater authority in its mission? On a personal level, how could the stress of such a role impact Brandon's wellbeing? Given Brandon's long-standing commitment to the organization, how can the family navigate this thorny issue weighing the needs of the family, external actors, and One Mind itself? The contents of this case contain material about mental health challenges and suicide. Some readers may find elements of this material distressing. If you are experiencing emotional crisis or distress, please contact a local mental health professional or your local suicide prevention hotline. In the U.S., you can reach the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 24/7 by calling or texting 988 or visiting 988lifeline.org/chat.

Allianz Turkey is a property casualty insurance company operating in a region experiencing increasing losses from natural catastrophe events related to climate change, for example hail, wildfire, and flooding. There are also substantial other natural catastrophe exposures including earthquakes. The operating environmnent includes high inflation and worsening exhange rates, both of which make it challenging to set premiums and to resolve claims when those milestones can occur years apart. In many ways the existence of these natural and financial pressures and the high awareness among the population of natural catastrophe hazards makes Turkey a precursor to what might occur in Europe and North America in the face of possible increasing perils related to climate change. The company has a dilemma at the time of the case regarding how to satisfy customers and settle claims from a hailstorm without historic precedent, which damaged tens of thousands of automobiles as well as other assets. How should the company satisfy these customers today? Should it avoid writing policies in higher risk areas in the future? Are there other ways to identify and manage risks in addition to contracts? The "B" case discusses the earthquake of 2023 and the "C" case discusses information technology, sensors, and predictive analytics that the company now uses to help manage the onset of and response to natural catastrophe situations.

Allianz Turkey is a property casualty insurance company operating in a region experiencing increasing losses from natural catastrophe events related to climate change, for example hail, wildfire, and flooding. There are also substantial other natural catastrophe exposures including earthquakes. The operating environment includes high inflation and worsening exchange rates, both of which make it challenging to set premiums and to resolve claims when those milestones can occur years apart. In many ways the existence of these natural and financial pressures and the high awareness among the population of natural catastrophe hazards makes Turkey a precursor to what might occur in Europe and North America in the face of possible increasing perils related to climate change. The company has a dilemma at the time of the case regarding how to satisfy customers and settle claims from a hailstorm without historic precedent, which damaged tens of thousands of automobiles as well as other assets. How should the company satisfy these customers today? Should it avoid writing policies in higher risk areas in the future? Are there other ways to identify and manage risks in addition to contracts? The "B" case discusses the earthquake of 2023 and the "C" case discusses information technology, sensors, and predictive analytics that the company now uses to help manage the onset of and response to natural catastrophe situations.

Allianz Turkey is a property casualty insurance company operating in a region experiencing increasing losses from natural catastrophe events related to climate change, for example hail, wildfire, and flooding. There are also substantial other natural catastrophe exposures including earthquakes. The operating environment includes high inflation and worsening exchange rates, both of which make it challenging to set premiums and to resolve claims when those milestones can occur years apart. In many ways the existence of these natural and financial pressures and the high awareness among the population of natural catastrophe hazards makes Turkey a precursor to what might occur in Europe and North America in the face of possible increasing perils related to climate change. The company has a dilemma at the time of the case regarding how to satisfy customers and settle claims from a hailstorm without historic precedent, which damaged tens of thousands of automobiles as well as other assets. How should the company satisfy these customers today? Should it avoid writing policies in higher risk areas in the future? Are there other ways to identify and manage risks in addition to contracts? The "B" case discusses the earthquake of 2023 and the "C" case discusses information technology, sensors, and predictive analytics that the company now uses to help manage the onset of and response to natural catastrophe situations.

Until 2022, Peloton Interactive, Inc. had been focussed on keeping up with unprecedented demand. However, by early 2022, the company’s fortunes had turned. Despite layoffs, cuts to capital spending, and price reductions, more dramatic changes were required. The company appointed a new chief executive officer in February 2022, who wrote a letter to shareholders three months later outlining the steps taken to stabilize cash flow, get the right people in the right roles, and return the company to profitability.

Spreadsheet to accompany product W32687.

Until 2022, Peloton Interactive, Inc. had been focussed on keeping up with unprecedented demand. However, by early 2022, the company's fortunes had turned. Despite layoffs, cuts to capital spending, and price reductions, more dramatic changes were required. The company appointed a new chief executive officer in February 2022, who wrote a letter to shareholders three months later outlining the steps taken to stabilize cash flow, get the right people in the right roles, and return the company to profitability.