個案總覽

The case analyses the scenario facing Paddy McGiness, the sole founder of Breathe coffee shop in Hays, Kansas, as he seeks to launch his new business without seeking any external financing. The case explores the various mindsets that characterise many entrepreneurs and uses Mullins' texts 'The Counter-Conventional Mindsets of Entrepreneurs' and 'Use Customer Cash to Fund Your Startup' to examine customer-funded business models.

It was a cold, blustery February morning in 2019. Pass the Keys co-founders Alex Lyakhotskiy and Zoe Vu were reflecting with their team on the three and a half years that their fast-growing company had been in business. "We're now managing 480 properties in nine cities across the UK. Most of our owner-hosts love what we do," said Lyakhotskiy. "But I'm worried, Zoe. We still have too many service quality issues - a maid that doesn't show up, a key that's missing from its key-box, and many more. And, for all our growth, only two of our cities are running profitably. Are we on the right path? Or should we be considering a pivot to another strategy that would serve us better

The case opens in May 2018 with Nurtac Ziyal Afridi, chief strategy and growth officer of Yildiz Holding, a Turkish conglomerate, reflecting on the group's diversification journey. In ten years, the group had achieved a remarkable growth through diversification: seven mergers, 33 acquisitions, and 23 divestments. By 2018, it had 164 companies and consolidated revenues of $12 billion. After two notable acquisitions (Godiva, a $850-million deal in 2007, and United Biscuits, a $3.2-billion deal in 2014), Yildiz Holding became one of the world's largest confectionary companies. However, Yildiz Holding's owner, Murat Ulker, wanted it to be the number one or two player globally. To achieve this goal, Afridi started a major restructuring program to focus on the group's core assets. That was not an easy feat. The group companies addressed mass market to luxury customers, and their portfolio of products ranged from confectionary to dairy, beverages, baby food, and olive oil. They had wholesaling operations as well as retailing businesses across a wide reach of geographies. Afridi's decisions in restructuring needed to balance all the various trade-offs. She had to decide how to define core, and accordingly decide which non-core assets to divest. Should she consider protecting only wholesaling businesses and divesting retailing? And what about managing their businesses in different geographies? Would it be a good idea if the group were to manage some geographies directly and leave the management of others to select partners?

Chia Network developed a novel blockchain platform that was more eco-friendly, decentralized, and scalable than Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other blockchains. Now, company leadership must decide how to scale the startup and prioritize various partnerships, use cases, and markets.

Mobile streaming app Quibi was ready to take the entertainment world by storm at its April 2020 launch. Backed by $1.75 billion, influential investors from Hollywood to Wall Street eagerly anticipated early success for this brainchild of Meg Whitman, former CEO of Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Jeffrey Katzenberg, former chairperson of Walt Disney Studios and co-founder of DreamWorks Pictures. Quibi's value proposition was to fill a 'white space' through seven to ten minute dramas, on a platform that was technologically sophisticated for users and extremely copyright friendly for content creators. Six months later, a disappointing lack of demand cornered Quibi into closing shop. Was it poor timing, or inherent business model viability? This case prompts discussion on the complete strategy landscape, from defining the opportunity set and value potential to understanding the ultimate outcome.

In 2020, amid the coronavirus pandemic, Chou Cheng Ngok, CEO of Popular Holdings Limited, a local multiproduct bookstore in Singapore, wanted to develop an omni-channel retail strategy to make up for the loss of foot traffic at the store. The book industry was already changing rapidly due to digitisation. Books became available on electronic readers and the advent of e-commerce gave online retailers a cost advantage over brick-and-mortar stores when it came to rental expenditure and sourcing from the cheapest distributors located anywhere in the world. While many local bookstores went out of business, Popular had managed to succeed by understanding the needs of its target audience. For instance, students and their parents would buy tuition materials to supplement the official curriculum in an effort to excel in Singapore's competitive education system. Popular also sold other ancillary products such as stationery and electronic gadgets. As brick-and-mortar stores continue to lose market share to online retailers, Chou wanted to implement an integrated omni-channel approach to provide a better experience for consumers.

In 2018, the Lo family of Hong Kong held a combined 68% of Great Eagle Holdings (GEH), a publicly listed and one of the largest real estate conglomerates in Hong Kong, 33.5% through a family trust and the remainder through individual holdings. Only 32.5% of the company was in public hands. The case opened with Dr. LO Ka-shui (KS), chairman and managing director of GEH, musing about a deep and serious split in the family. Trained as a cardiologist, KS helped his father with the family business since 1980 and played a critical role in rescuing the company from near bankruptcy. Between 1984 and 2018, the Net Asset Value (NAV) of GEH expanded by 350 times as Hong Kong property values boomed. KS felt that he could take the credit for the company's success, as his father's right-hand man for most of that time, and chairman for the 12 years since his father's death in 2006, during which he expanded the company's assets, paid off debt, and raised HK$23 billion from capital markets. With the increase in his personal shareholdings to 27%, it raised questions among some of his eight siblings, despite the fact that his personal holdings were a matter of public knowledge. In 2016, KS' mother, Lo To Lee-kwan (Madam Lo), three of his brothers and two sisters challenged his control of the company, in a painful and very public family dispute focusing on the governing structure of the Lo family trust. The challenge not only put family control of GEH in jeopardy; it also raised questions about the ability of trust structures to maintain family unity in an Asian family business, where family unity and harmony, as well as wealth preservation and family values, are top priorities.

In 2015, the lean transformation of the University of Chicago Medicine medical centre encompassed substantial renovation of its internal supply chain. This included moving from a centralized warehouse-based system managed largely by clinical teams to a lean, decentralized, just-in-time system managed by supply chain professionals. In early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic brought new challenges to the University of Chicago Medicine's supply chain. Accommodating for the COVID-19 pandemic required making numerous changes to the physical supply chain, which could potentially affect actions and decisions at the level of operations on the hospital floors. Amid so many changes, how would the supply chain team members on the hospital floor address daily issues while maintaining efforts to improve the system? How would they remain aligned to the hospital's mission and goals?

Ya Kun was an Asian coffee chain best known for its coffee, soft-boiled eggs and kaya toast with over 128 outlets in Singapore and the Asia Pacific region. What started as a coffee stall at Telok Ayer Basin before World War II to support the Loi family grew into a successful regional coffee chain that was a household name synonymous with Singapore kopi culture at home and overseas. Simultaneously, consumers were increasingly aware of the impacts of business practices on the environment and society. The emergence of green consumerism meant that consumers expected businesses to address the impact of their operations on the environment. Using the Triple Bottom Line framework, together with UN SDG8 (Decent Work & Economic Growth) and UN SDG12 (Responsible Consumption & Production), the case presents some of the challenges and opportunities impacting Ya Kun in light of the increasing attention on sustainability. How should Ya Kun face the challenges and leverage on the opportunities afforded by sustainable business practices to grow its regional F&B business?

In May 2021, the South Korean boy band BTS beat out other international musicians for all four of the Billboard Music Awards for which they had been nominated. "Dynamite," BTS's top-selling song, was the band's first song in English. BTS and other K-pop groups had been able to achieve a high level of global success, especially since 2013, despite singing in a language that was foreign to many listeners. K-pop and other elements of Korea's creative economy represented Hallyu or "Korean Wave" of globally popular Korean entertainment and culture. Hallyu had contributed to the South Korean economy since 1999. Were Hallyu and its constituents serendipitous? How did BTS, K-pop, and Korea's creative economy act as Korea's secret weapon? Were there limits to the use of Hallyu?

The founder of Cheekbone Beauty, an Indigenous enterprise in the Niagara Region of Ontario, was driven by the goal of becoming "the first Indigenous woman to create a unicorn beauty brand from Canada." In early 2021, she was seeking resolution to an ongoing entrepreneurial dilemma: How should she identify the fledgling company's unique strengths and build them into sustainable competitive advantages?

The case features Sara Razmpa, head of responsible investment, and Fiona Frick, CEO of Unigestion, at a critical juncture in the Geneva-based asset management firm's ESG journey: the decision to launch an equities fund that specifically tackles climate change. While Unigestion had launched product families that integrated ESG in the past, this would be a new and more challenging undertaking. The case opens with the two debating between whether to launch a Climate Transition Fund or the more ambitious Paris-aligned Fund. Both methods aligned with the Paris Agreement by placing the portfolio on a 1.5ºC trajectory, with no or limited overshoot, and heading towards net-zero by 2050. However, they differed in their starting points and stringency. Students are placed in the shoes of Razmpa and Frick and need to decide which portfolio to launch - while balancing climate impact, commercial considerations and fund performance. The selection of climate funds is not straightforward. The decision touches on key debate points in sustainable finance: a financial investor's fiduciary duty, whether to exclude or engage with high emitters and what would be most effective in tackling climate change. Finally, the case includes a practical application exercise where students can construct their own climate-focused portfolio. This is a timely case. There is a growing spotlight on climate change, especially with COP 26 in late 2021. Despite country pledges for net-zero emissions, a UN study found that current fossil fuel production plans set forth by governments worldwide for 2030 is double the level required to limit global warming to 1.5ºC. The financial sector, as a key allocator of capital, has a key role to play. This case can help students better understand the role financial institutions can play in the transformation towards a 1.5ºC world, the nuances of building climate positive portfolios and how to critically analyze different climate strategies and their implications.

Luke Fuszard (MBA 2010) shares the personal details of his life leading up to the moment when he was unexpectedly fired from his job in early 2021.

This case details the journey of Sandeep Mathrani as he took over as CEO of WeWork, a flexible space provider, in the aftermath of the company's attempted IPO. To execute his turnaround plan, Mathrani must navigate a global pandemic, execute layoffs, rebuild the company's reputation, renegotiate contracts with landlords, and rebuild trust with members and employees. Further, Mathrani must consider how to navigate a post-pandemic world as the leader of a public company that was increasingly blurring the line between digital and physical.

Analysts have often compared Digital Transformation to an iceberg and a company embarking on it to a ship trying to manoeuvre the iceberg. Some facets of the transformation are easily visible, while others are under the water and difficult to identify and manage. Douglas Chia, Managing Director of g&m Insurance, was well aware of this theory when he embarked on his firm's digital transformation journey. Chia had implemented small digital initiatives in his organisation in 2019, and was able to see significant revenue growth of 30% in 2020, despite a sluggish market because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Chia wanted to continue driving his firm's growth and positive revenue trend, specifically with digital solutions that targeted the evolving insurance market. He set goals to embark further on the digital transformation journey, by introducing an online portal providing online insurance products and an aggregator platform by the end of 2021. The above goals were in tandem with the developments in the insurance industry, as more and more firms were introducing online insurance products and offering them directly to consumers, thus eliminating the need for an intermediary agent or broker. Amidst such changing market conditions, brokerage firms like g&m had no option but to transform their business models to compete in the market. Chia wanted to continue using his agent based business model for existing customers, and introduce online solutions to target new market segments. What strategies could Chia implement to further g&m's digital transformation journey to expand his business?

In January 2019, Raymond Holmes, head of the Singapore Association of Chief Marketing Officers (CMO), an informal roundtable of CMOs from multinational corporations, went to explore Habitat, a hi-tech grocery store by Honestbee, a food and grocery delivery company. The advent of e-commerce allowed consumers to buy products online. Asset-light retailers had cost advantages over physical stores when it came to rental expenditure and inventory storage. Honestbee pioneered the food concierge service in Singapore, helping busy consumers fulfil and deliver online grocery orders from partners that had physical stores. Three years after its founding, the company added a physical storefront that aimed to be a lifestyle destination with a grocery store and other dining concepts. The futuristic store would also attract non-shoppers to the area. Holmes wondered if Honestbee's multichannel approach would provide a better experience for the consumers and enhance its profitability.

In February 2020, a social geographer at the University of Victoria was approached by one of the co-founders and managing partners of Raven Indigenous Capital Partners to develop an Indigenous impact measurement framework for the company. Raven Indigenous Capital Partners was founded in 2017 in Vancouver, British Columbia. The founders launched the Raven Indigenous Impact Fund to invest in early-stage growth businesses started by Indigenous entrepreneurs. The ultimate goal was to increase the well-being of Indigenous communities in Canada, but the fund had to demonstrate to non-Indigenous impact investors that they could target, measure, and report their social impact while earning an annual rate of return of 6-8 per cent on their investment. The social geographer faced two key tasks. She had to develop an impact measurement framework that combined Indigenous and non-Indigenous approaches to measuring social and environmental impacts. She also had to engage the Indigenous community in reporting on these outcomes.

Businesses have traditionally assessed their climate risks primarily by reference to regulatory compliance requirements and related costs. However, recent developments in the law, regulation, and corporate governance suggest that businesses need to have a broader understanding of their responsibility for mitigating the effects of climate change and the potential risks to their business. This case sets out examples of four such recent developments: a Dutch court ordering Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions; successful shareholder activist campaigns at Chevron and Exxon; and regulators' scrutiny of listed company climate disclosures. The case highlights pressures from regulators and law courts in enforcing emissions reductions more strictly than previously and the greater litigation risk that corporations will face going forward. In addition, there is growing pressure from shareholders advocating that their corporations have a climate policy in line with international regulations and norms, which the senior management of corporations is taking seriously. The case provides the reader with an insight into the real issues of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues that senior management will need to resolve. This case places readers in the position of the board of a fictional global energy conglomerate and invites them to consider how these developments impact the company's strategic thinking and corporate policies. The case encourages discussion of corporate strategy, risk management, public relations, and investor communications in the context of ESG issues and aims to broaden students' conceptual framework of these key issues.