個案總覽

In the 11 years since its public offering, Inditex and its flagship brand, Zara, had expanded into 86 countries, achieved $21.6 billion in revenue, and become the largest specialty apparel retailer in the world. In marked contrast to the general malaise of the Bolsa de Madrid, Inditex's share price tripled from 2008 to 2012 and traded at 25 times expected 2013 earnings, a 15% premium over Swedish rival, H&M. From 1,080 stores in 2000, it had expanded to 6,009 locations while sales and operating profits grew 25% p.a over this period. It had also established online stores across 23 different markets, with plans for launches in Russia and Canada during 2013, and it managed eight different brands. CEO Pablo Isla remained confident of future success and anticipated store expansion would continue growing at 8%-10% per year for the next three to five years. How could Inditex best maintain its strong growth and fend off competition?

In 2013, Anders Byriel, CEO of the family-owned Danish textiles company, Kvadrat, considered the firm's strategic plan. In 2000, Byriel and Mette Bendix, Kvadrat's Product Director, had taken over management of the company from their fathers, who had founded Kvadrat in the 1960s. Byriel and Bendix had joined Kvadrat in 1992, and since that time, Kvadrat had grown from €19 million in annual sales to over €86 million. It had expanded its focus on selling textiles to European architects and furniture manufactures, becoming a global company with a wide product range and a broad customer base. Kvadrat's internal organization had grown and transformed to support this larger business. Now Kvadrat's management team was focused on a number of key initiatives: expansion into Asia; improved sales trends in its curtain and Soft Cells businesses; development of Kvadrat's retail sales operations; the implementation of new Human Resources practices; and the execution of a new organizational design. Was such an extensive growth, turnaround and internal development agenda feasible? And, were the initiatives being considered the right ones for Kvadrat?

Though it had wiped out billions of dollars of debt "Houdini-style" in the past, in 2008 the future of Caesars Entertainment Corporation was uncertain. This case presents students with the company's complex financial circumstances and an overview of the industry in which it competes, as seen through the lens of an associate at a credit hedge fund. Charged by the firm's senior portfolio manager with assessing an investment in the debt securities of Caesars Entertainment Corporation, the associate is asked to analyze the terms of a proposed leveraged buy-out.

This case considers the strategies of Charles W. Engelhard, an American mining magnate who made large investments in apartheid-era South Africa. Engelhard was widely believed to have been the model for the James Bond villan Auric Goldfinger. During the 1950s and 1960s Engelhard, who was well-connected with the leadership of the Democratic Party in the United States including President Lyndon B. Johnson, was one of the largest American investors in that country. His close relationship with Harry Oppenheimer, the head of the Anglo-American Corporation, gave him substantial influence within the South African business system. The case starts with anti-apartheid demonstrators protesting outside a ceremony awarding him a prize in Newark, New Jersey. It provides an opportunity to debate the political and ethical responsibilities of businesses in repressive regimes, and the challenges faced by entrepreneurs operating in countries with different value systems and political regimes.

On January 29, 2013, Elliott Management, a hedge fund run by Paul E. Singer that owned 4.5% of Hess Corporation stock, put forward a slate of five independent directors it wanted elected to improve the company's performance. Elliott argued that Hess lacked focus and was distracted by ventures outside its core exploration and production business. Further it argued that John Hess, CEO and son of the founder, of being more interested in "maintaining a family dynasty than instilling accountability and addressing chronic underperformance."

On July 12, 2012, Bill Ackman's Pershing Square Capital Management announced publicly that it had purchased about $2 billion of Procter and Gamble (P&G) stock. Shares in the company closed up 3.75% the day the disclosure was made public. Ackman told the New York Times that Pershing would be a major P&G shareholder. ""We think it's an underrated stock,"" he said. ""We think there is a lot of great opportunity there."" During the next several months there was little or no public discussion of the matter although people familiar with the situation reported that Ackman held conversations with P&G directors individually. Then, on April 24, 2013, P&G announced that its 3rd quarter earnings had risen 6%. However its 4th quarter forecast fell short of Wall Street's expectations. Shares fell 5% based on this outlook. P&G results were lagging its peers by 4% in 2012 and 2% in the first quarter of 2013. Then, abruptly in late May, CEO Robert A. McDonald, who was 59, resigned. The board selected A.J. Lafley, (65) who had been McDonald's predecessor to return to lead the company. There was speculation about how long Lafley would stay and in what direction he would take the company. On June 6th, P&G announced that Lafley had appointed four senior executives to lead the company's major businesses, reporting directly to him.

Sullivan Container operated both new industrial steel barrel production and the reconditioning of industrial steel drum and plastic containers in several plant locations in the United States. The firm operated in an industry with a checkered past, characterized by periods of price fixing and environmental problems. A new management team acquired the firm in 2007 and began revamping manufacturing practices and focusing on environmentally sustainable practices. Faced with the severe economic crisis in 2009, the firm continued to pursue sustainable practices, but now faces a critical question as investment costs in sustainable practices increase. The key question we explore is: Given the industry history, will build sustainable practices into their business model drive a customer's Willingness to Pay? The case allows students to explore the challenges of creating a Willingness to Pay for aspects of value creation that may have no immediate positive effect on their customer's internal operations.

In January 2007, Gary Wendlandt was concerned about the US economy. As Chief Investment Officer of the New York Life Insurance Company (NYLIC), he was responsible for managing a $147 billion investment portfolio. The US housing market was weakening at a time when financial institutions had significant assets tied up in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. Credit risk spreads were narrowing despite a general easing of underwriting standards. Wendlandt outlined his concerns in a memo to Ted Mathas, NYLIC's Chief Operating Officer. The question before Wendlandt and his investment management team was how to implement a "quality tilt" strategy. This would require placing more of NYLIC's new cash flows into safer fixed income products. NYLIC had a responsibility to its policyholders. It was management's duty to protect the longevity and financial strength of the firm, so that it could continue to pay policyholder claims, distribute payments from annuities, and issue dividends. Wendlandt faced a classic risk/return tradeoff - i.e., lower current interest income to avoid the higher potential risk of capital losses. How should he adjust NYLIC's investment portfolio?

This case traces the rise of Chinese piano maker Pearl River Piano (PRP) from a factory with dirt floors producing just four pianos a month using crude machinery to the world's largest acoustic piano maker in 2012. PRP's success is compelling: it accounted for over 20 percent of the global piano market by unit volume, with 14 percent growth despite tough industry conditions in 2012. In addition to dominating its domestic market (28 percent market share in China), it exported its pianos to more than 100 countries and regions worldwide. The journey was an extraordinary one: PRP was able to overcome major quality issues in order to carve out market share in a mature industry with huge entry barriers, and dominated by established Western and Japanese players. How did PRP earn the trust of consumers purchasing a fine, expensive, musical instrument for their home? How was PRP able to successfully compete on quality with companies that had been making pianos for centuries, while also building the marketing and leadership expertise needed to grow a global piano brand?

The case explores the methodologies for valuing an early stage, IP based business. Endomagnetics is a university spin-off based on technology from University college London. By the time of the case the business has raised (and largely spent) a seed round and is about to raise 'Series A'. The new CEO, Eric Mayes, is in discussion with investors. There is some interest and he knows that he'll soon need to propose - and justify - a pre-money valuation. He has the usual set of base assumptions on market size and penetration along with information on similar businesses. The question is how he can assemble this information to produce a valuation. The case uses a series of spreadsheets (created by a MBA intern as it happens) that take us through all the alternatives from detailed bottom-up 'decision -tree' methods through to more sweeping market comparables, examining the strengths, practicalities and limitations of each approach.

The case analyzes the consumer choice behavior in the case of detergents sold in an Indian retail store, Reliance Retail. The protagonist, Parul Khanna, the house brand (private label) manager at Reliance Retail wanted to know whether promotions have any short-term or long-term impact on brand switching and customer retention. Sudz, the house-brand detergent sold by Reliance Retail, was envisioned as a cost-effective detergent, giving comparable wash results as some of the established national brands such as Surf, Rin, Ariel, and so on. The questions nagging Parul were: Could customers who had been habitually purchasing a certain brand for many years really consider a house brand and make that switch? Is there a need to interfere in the market and create a "catalyst" effect? Students are expected to evaluate the impact of promotion on brand switching and brand loyalty among detergent purchasers. The case may be used in advanced statistics, stochastic process, and business analytics courses of MBA or Executive MBA programs as well as in a Ph.D. program in Statistics and Business Analytics.

This case on Tally Solutions Pvt. Ltd. traces the evolution of the firm and highlights how the product has evolved from a ubiquitous accounting software into an all-encompassing platform, with the launch of Tally.ERP.9. The case is poised at a time when the company has to consciously make the shift from being a product sales and service company to repositioning itself into an enterprise software company (with the product still being sold in the shrink-wrapped form), and therefore begin encountering the forces of network effects and platform dynamics.

Garnier which was launched in the United States in 2003 acquired a market share of 5.1% within a year. Pantene, which was the market leader in the United States in the shampoo category, saw its market share decline from 22% to 20.5% during the same period. The steep decline in the market share worried Procter & Gamble, the owner of the Pantene brand. It wondered whether the decline was because of lack of distribution, or higher pricing or unfavorable consumer perception. It hired leading market research agency - Nielsen to identify the cause of decline in market share and to suggest marketing strategy. This case elaborates on the research findings of Nielsen. It also traces the evolution of market research industry and in particular Nielsen. It describes the various research offerings of Nielsen.

The case describes the efforts of Reliance Retail in establishing a dedicated supply chain for sourcing bananas directly from farmers and selling them through Reliance's retail outlets in urban India. Reliance intervenes at multiple points in the supply chain, educating the farmers about better ways of planting, growing and harvesting bananas, introducing hygienic techniques of ripening and bypassing several layers of middlemen. This results in greater income for farmers, lesser wastage in the supply chain and better quality of fruits for the consumers. While Reliance's efforts with bananas seem to be a success, there are various challenges in scaling the model and leveraging the supply chain to source other fruits and vegetables. By describing the challenges and various tradeoffs that Reliance had to make, the case highlights how a large commercial organization such as Reliance can establish a viable business model that makes a positive impact on the lives of poor farmers and traders.

The case describes the inception and early stage evolution of RuralShores - a business process outsourcing organization established in rural India (Rural BPO). RBPO is a unique business model that involves the rural poor in delivering remote services such as transaction processing via telecommunication links. Although India has a thriving BPO business, all BPO organizations are located in urban centers. The founders of RuralShores conceptualized the rural BPO model so that it can be inclusive, empower rural women and solve problems of large-scale migration. Locating a BPO organization in rural India enabled significant savings in cost. However, it had its attendant challenges, such as dealing with poor quality infrastructure and a lower level of skills among the employees. RuralShores not only overcame these challenges but also ensured that its service levels were on par with those of urban BPO organizations. In the process, it was able to create positive impact in the lives of its employees as well as give a boost to the local economy. This motivated it to embark on an aggressive plan of scaling that involves geographic expansion through a franchisee model and increasing the scope of RuralShores' activities.

Dr. Ananth Rao, who heads the Quality Department at Apollo Hospitals, Bangalore, had undertaken initiatives to measure and benchmark the hospitality services at the hospital. In-patients spend around 80% of their time under the care of the staff from different departments such as nursing, housekeeping, food & beverages, operations, and so on. The Quality team at Apollo Bangalore received 1,434 complaints from the 1,38,600 in-patients treated between March 2011 and December 2012. The feedback was generally open-ended, in the form of patients' comments, opinions, or suggestions. Of the 1,434 complaints received, the housekeeping department received the maximum number of complaints, while the dietary service had the least number. Some of the complaints were genuine concerns, while some were related to minor discomfort. Some of the complaints were very specific, while some were generic. All of these were analyzed, which would enable the hospital to work towards reducing the overall number of complaints. Text analytics was used to analyze the open-ended complaints. In order to gain deeper insights, "Defect-Defective" techniques were used to identify the processes that caused the defects. The processes were re-engineered to eliminate all the defects and a pilot study was done using the "Define Measure Analyse Improve and Control" (DMAIC) cycle. Dr. Rao and his team have developed benchmarks for several common complaints with three levels of service by adopting the Kano model. Critical to Quality (CTQ) metrics have been defined and Sigma levels were calculated for each CTQ. Dr Rao is pondering on what is a good Sigma score target to set given the importance of hospitality in Apollo Hospitals.

A family business in Indonesia is hit hard by the economic downturn, and some family members want the former CEO--the founder's son--to retain the reins. Others argue that this would be a mistake. This fictional case study is written by William C. Kirby, featuring expert commentary by Les Trachtman and Lilli Friedland.

A family business in Indonesia is hit hard by the economic downturn, and some family members want the former CEO--the founder's son--to retain the reins. Others argue that this would be a mistake. This fictional case study is written by William C. Kirby, featuring expert commentary by Les Trachtman and Lilli Friedland.

A family business in Indonesia is hit hard by the economic downturn, and some family members want the former CEO--the founder's son--to retain the reins. Others argue that this would be a mistake. This fictional case study is written by William C. Kirby, featuring expert commentary by Les Trachtman and Lilli Friedland.

A graduating fourth-year HBA student faces an ethical dilemma as she struggles to decide which one of two job offers to accept. The situation is complicated by the fact that she has received an exploding offer from one firm and she must respond to it on the same day as she participates in a final-round interview with the other firm. The stakeholders in this case include the student, the two firms, the university and its career-management program, and the other graduating students in the HBA program. The (B) case 9B13C021 is set about two weeks later, when Patricia Coulter is wrestling with another decision.