個案總覽

The case describes Ball's multi decade history of using Economic Value Added to drive decision making and workforce compensation. In 2016, the company acquired Rexam PLC and became the world's leading metal beverage container company. Consumer demand for varied aluminum can sizes led Ball to evaluate long term cost savings and efficiencies. In 2017, the company had to determine if it should open a new factory or upgrade two newly acquired factories. Opening the new factory required closing the other two. Ball used economic value added analysis to inform its decision making about this dilemma in this case.

In August 2022, a Canadian investor, Adam Eissa, was considering making an investment in Nautilus Inc. (Nautilus). Nautilus was a manufacturer of connected home fitness equipment that was experiencing financial volatility amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Before coming to a decision, Eissa wanted to analyze the financial data from Nautilus's annual report and complete a business size-up of its corporate strategy.

On January 2, 2018, the chief executive officer of a private company in Karachi, Pakistan, Imaam Spinning Mills (Imaam), was planning to expand the company's product line and enter the weaving business by setting up a new weaving plant. He asked his chief financial officer to conduct a financial evaluation financial evaluation of the project. To do so, she needed to calculate the weighted average cost of capital, using the comparative method to calculate the cost of capital for the unlisted firm based on financial data from Imaam and comparable firms, and determine the feasibility of the project.

Faraaz Usmani, heir to the family-owned Herbo Drugs & Pharmaceuticals, a small private Unani pharmaceutical company in Prayagraj, India, planned to expand the company's business to other states to cover most parts of India. Before implementing this ambitious plan, Faraaz needed to conduct a feasibility study by applying some popular capital budgeting tools such as net present value, internal rate of return, and profitability index. He first projected the cash flows for ten years with an initial investment of ₹6.5 million financed with 80 per cent equity and 20 per cent debt. He expected sales to grow by 15 per cent annually for the next five years, 10 per cent from year 6 to year 10, and a perpetual growth rate of 5 per cent afterward. Faraaz understood that the estimation of the cost of capital was a key step in his analysis. He discovered that finding the cost of equity for a private firm was tricky because stock return information was not available to estimate beta. The case introduces the basics of cost of capital (i.e., weighted average cost of capital) and capital budgeting. It focuses on the details of how to estimate the cost of equity for a private firm.

Spreadsheet Supplement for Case W34060

In January 2021, Indigo Paints Limited launched an initial public offering of ordinary equity shares to list the company on a stock exchange. It was one of the most subscribed public offers in recent times in India. The company was in the business of manufacturing and selling decorative paints. A retail investor from Mumbai, India received an allotment of Indigo shares and wondered if the grey market premium indicated a fair value for the stock. He understood that initial public offerings were generally underpriced, but wondered what the company’s intrinsic value actually was. He sought input from his friend, who was an independent financial advisor, to help him understand the value proposition that the initial public offering would bring to Indigo Paints Limited. The two friends consulted all relevant financial statements and began their calculations.

Spreadsheet to accompany product W31083.

In this exercise, students are required to match eleven unidentified companies to the relevant industry group in which they operate, based on the Global Industry Classification Standards (GICS). Students are provided with a description of the eleven GICS and the financial information of the eleven companies. Each company is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). While the exercise has an Australian focus, international students should be able to correctly match the companies to their industry due to the generic nature of the industry characteristics.

Spreadsheet to accompany product W32386.

Annie Anthony, the chief financial officer of Liz Motor Corp. (Liz), was attempting to use capital budgeting to evaluate an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) project using all the available quantitative and qualitative information. Anthony had planned an ESG project, which would help the company adopt solid-state battery technology for most Liz electric vehicles and reduce the carbon footprint of electric vehicle batteries by 39 per cent, to improve the company’s ESG and sustainability. The technology was so new that Liz would be the first major automaker to use it on a large scale. It would increase sales and the profit margin in the long run but would also require a heavy initial investment to allow Liz to adopt the technology. With all the information needed for a thorough capital budgeting analysis, Anthony believed she was ready to develop a framework to comprehensively evaluate this critical project. She also needed to do ten sensitivity analyses based on ten different scenarios.

Student Spreadsheet to accompany product W32397.

Instructor Spreadsheet to accompany product #W32398.

It was the height of the summer in 2022, and Michel Doukeris, the CEO of Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev), and Peter Kraemer, the company's Chief Supply Officer, gazed across the vast desert surrounding Zacatecas, Mexico. They were visiting their Grupo Modelo Brewery, AB InBev's largest and the highest-volume producer in the world, to contemplate their goal of increasing sales while reducing the company's impact on the natural environment. This case documents how company executives led an organizational transformation designed to help the firm balance growth and sustainability and achieve two benchmarks: becoming the number-one consumer packaged goods company for top-line growth and achieving their 2025 sustainability target, referred to as 100+ goals, and composed of smart agriculture, water stewardship, circular packaging, and climate action. The case illuminates the key decisions AB InBev executives needed to make, including making capital-intensive investments into the supply chain that drive sustainability and growth, reinventing processes and an overarching business model that had remained largely the same for hundreds of years, as well as changing how people work in a culture steeped in tradition.

Excel Supplement consists of financial statements of Icahn Enterprises and two competitors. Supplement to 124013

Icahn Enterprises, a publicly traded limited partnership founded and operated by famed activist investor Carl Icahn, had earned above market returns for over a decade. Between 2018 and early 2023, it had a compound annual return of 31%. Icahn invested in undervalued companies and then publicly pressured boards of directors to make changes to increase the share price. Hindenburg Research (Hindenburg), an activist short-selling investment firm founded by Nathan Anderson, took short positions in companies it felt were overvalued, published research reports to drive down the stock price, and then profit from the decline. In May 2023, Hindenburg published a report claiming that Icahn Enterprises stock price was overvalued by 75%, that its 15% dividend yield was not sustainable, and that it sustained itself through a Ponzi-like economic model by issuing new stock to new investors so it could pay dividends to existing investors. Would Icahn Enterprises continue to outperform the market or was it a Ponzi disaster waiting to happen?

The case is set in spring 2021, immediately after Plug Power made financial restatements dating back to 2018. The case describes the restatements, which revealed that Plug was reclassifying expense items to boost gross profits.

Set immediately after a December 2019 short-seller attack, the case explores Plug Power's long challenging history. It then focuses on two key issues raised in the short-seller report related to lease accounting and stock warrants that Plug purportedly used to boost profits.

In January 2019, the Competition Commission of India approved a significant merger in India's fast-moving consumer goods industry. The merger between Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) and GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Limited (GSKCONS) took place in April 2020. The deal helped HUL strengthen its food and refreshments business and diversify into the health food drinks market. The hefty purchase price paid for the merger led HUL to record massive goodwill and other intangible assets that had previously not been recorded on GSKCONS financial statements. An investor researching the merger noticed these drastically increased values and wondered how a product company could have such high intangible assets on its balance sheet. What was HUL's strategic motive in the merger? Had it acquired some right-to-use assets from GSKCONS that had led to an increase in other intangible assets? What were the potential sources of value from the merger? Would the merger benefit HUL in the long run?

Spreadsheet to accompany product W33460.