個案總覽

Annie Anthony, the chief financial officer of Liz Motor Corp. (Liz), was attempting to use capital budgeting to evaluate an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) project using all the available quantitative and qualitative information. Anthony had planned an ESG project, which would help the company adopt solid-state battery technology for most Liz electric vehicles and reduce the carbon footprint of electric vehicle batteries by 39 per cent, to improve the company’s ESG and sustainability. The technology was so new that Liz would be the first major automaker to use it on a large scale. It would increase sales and the profit margin in the long run but would also require a heavy initial investment to allow Liz to adopt the technology. With all the information needed for a thorough capital budgeting analysis, Anthony believed she was ready to develop a framework to comprehensively evaluate this critical project. She also needed to do ten sensitivity analyses based on ten different scenarios.

Student Spreadsheet to accompany product W32397.

Instructor Spreadsheet to accompany product #W32398.

Spreadsheet to accompany product W31084.

Alliant Credit Union (Alliant) had to decide whether to partner with Upstart Holdings, Inc. (Upstart), a financial technology (fintech) company that offered a platform to connect borrowers and lenders. Upstart's underwriting models used artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) algorithms to analyze both standard financial variables and "alternative data" on borrowers (e.g., their education history). Studies found that Upstart's approach to underwriting resulted in fewer defaults and more approvals relative to conventional models based on credit scores. However, the use of alternative data in the underwriting process raised fair-lending concerns. In 2020, a nonprofit claimed that Upstart's use of educational variables led to discriminatory outcomes. While Upstart disputed this claim, it agreed to reform aspects of its models to ensure fairness. This case requires students to evaluate tradeoffs associated with the use of new data and technology in the underwriting process. On the one hand, Upstart's underwriting models expanded access to credit, particularly benefiting borrowers with limited credit histories. On the other hand, the use of alternative data raised fairness concerns because the variables were often correlated with factors such as race, ethnicity, and age. The case also provides an opportunity to discuss fair lending laws in the United States, the economics of underwriting, and funding models used by fintech firms. At Darden, this case is used as part of a second-year MBA elective on fintech. It is part of a unit that studies applications of fintech to borrowing and lending. The case could also be used in classes on banking and financial institutions or corporate social responsibility.

Supplement to 218084, "Root Capital and the Efficient Impact Frontier".

Spreadsheet supplement to 218084, "Root Capital and the Efficient Impact Frontier".

In July 2021, the CEO of AB InBev's European operations and his team strategized to position the company for success post-pandemic. As the world's largest beer company, boasting over 500 brands, revenue of $46 billion, and a workforce of 160,000 in 2020, AB InBev grappled with the repercussions of the pandemic, particularly the adverse effects on on-trade customers like bars and restaurants. Historically a traditional firm in a conventional industry, AB InBev had begun a substantial digital transformation in recent years. This strategic shift was aimed at leveraging data and market insights more effectively. A key component of this transformation was the creation of the Growth Analytics Center (GAC) in India in 2016, a move designed to embed advanced forecasting and analytics into their business model. As the pandemic unfolded, management increasingly relied on the GAC's analytics and forecasts to navigate the evolving crisis. With pandemic restrictions starting to relax in mid-2021, the company began considering substantial investments in the struggling on-trade sector to gain market share. The company considered offering grants in the form of pre-paid discounts to pubs and restaurants that needed capital to reopen after the pandemic. The dilemma was whether to proactively reinvest in the on-trade sector or take a cautious approach. The decision rested on interpreting GAC data and the company's financial outlook.

Spreadsheet supplement for case 224005.

In 2020, Henrique Dubugras and Pedro Franceschi, co-founders and co-CEO's of the fintech company Brex, needed to determine how to balance their vision with the desires of their investors. They intended to expand Brex's offerings to include other products that served the financial needs of their startup, but some of their investors believed the focus should be on improving existing features to meet customer base needs. While Dubugras and Franceschi oversaw development of existing products and considered new ones, they were also trying to raise a Series D round from the same investors who voiced concerns on expansion. How should they balance their vision of a one-stop financial shop for businesses, with the investors' desire to be cautious and offer features to keep up with the competition?

In May 2021, the majority shareholder and chief executive officer of Ontrak Inc., a US health care services company, established two 10b5-1 trading plans to sell approximately one million shares of stock he acquired by exercising expiring warrants. Before he began the process to execute the first 10b5-1 plan, Ontrak Inc. had just lost its largest client. Three days into the process for the second 10b5-1 trading plan, the company announced that it was losing another major client. On March 1, 2023, two concurrent insider trading lawsuits were filed against the chief executive officer by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and by the United States Department of Justice. The lawsuits contended that he sold his stock the day after filing the plans instead of waiting a set number of days, commonly known as a “cooling-off” period. However, the chief executive officer was arguing that a cooling-off period was not mandatory when he sold his stock, insisting that the “government [had] clearly overreached in this case.” He was forced to prepare a defence against two separate lawsuits filed against him.

In May 2021, the majority shareholder and chief executive officer of Ontrak Inc., a US health care services company, established two 10b5-1 trading plans to sell approximately one million shares of stock he acquired by exercising expiring warrants. Before he began the process to execute the first 10b5-1 plan, Ontrak Inc. had just lost its largest client. Three days into the process for the second 10b5-1 trading plan, the company announced that it was losing another major client. On March 1, 2023, two concurrent insider trading lawsuits were filed against the chief executive officer by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and by the United States Department of Justice. The lawsuits contended that he sold his stock the day after filing the plans instead of waiting a set number of days, commonly known as a "cooling-off" period. However, the chief executive officer was arguing that a cooling-off period was not mandatory when he sold his stock, insisting that the "government [had] clearly overreached in this case." He was forced to prepare a defence against two separate lawsuits filed against him.

As 2017 was drawing to a close, birddogs' founder and CEO, Peter Baldwin, was working with his CFO Jack Sullivan to prepare for 2018. Their task at hand? To predict the demand for their product in the coming season, determine the appropriate investments in working capital, and explore financing options. birddogs was a nascent direct-to-consumer apparel brand that had carved its niche in men's athletic shorts. The firm was coming off a stellar year, having more than doubled its sales over the previous year. This swift expansion, however, wasn't without its fair share of challenges-primarily in managing working capital, with inventory being the chief concern. The speed of birddogs' growth caught its inventory management off-guard, resulting in out-of-stock situations for about one-third of its products during 2017. Historically, the company had followed a conservative approach to inventory investment, which often led to stockouts. Baldwin had always favored this prudent approach to ensure the company did not overextend itself. Yet, times were changing. Encouraged by the prospect of increased visibility from upcoming publicity, Baldwin and Sullivan began to entertain the idea of a bolder, more aggressive investment strategy. The future was bright, and they were prepared to seize it.

As 2017 was drawing to a close, birddogs' founder and CEO, Peter Baldwin, was working with his CFO Jack Sullivan to prepare for 2018. Their task at hand? To predict the demand for their product in the coming season, determine the appropriate investments in working capital, and explore financing options. birddogs was a nascent direct-to-consumer apparel brand that had carved its niche in men's athletic shorts. The firm was coming of a stellar year, having more than doubled its sales over the previous year. This swift expansion, however, wasn't without its fair share of challenges-primarily in managing working capital, with inventory being the chief concern. The speed of birddogs' growth caught its inventory management off-guard, resulting in out-of-stock situations for about one-third of its products during 2017. Historically, the company had followed a conservative approach to inventory investment, which often led to stockouts. Baldwin, had always favored this prudent approach to ensure the company did not overextend itself. Yet, times were changing. Encouraged by the prospect of increased visibility from upcoming publicity, Baldwin and Sullivan began to entertain the idea of a bolder, more aggressive investment strategy. The future was bright, and they were prepared to seize it.

In late 2021, Ben Carr, Director of Analytics and Capital Modeling at Aviva Plc (Aviva)-a leading insurer with core operations in the UK, Ireland and Canada,-was preparing for an upcoming presentation before the company's board which included its CEO, Amanda Blanc, featuring the results of Aviva's performance in the Climate Biennial Exploratory Scenario (CBES) exercise mandated by the Bank of England. The CBES required all major banks and insurers in the country to formally assess the financial risks arising from both the physical impacts of climate change and the transition to a net zero economy. As Carr was in the final stages of refining and updating the CBES findings, he and his team were tasked with discerning how potential climate change consequences might influence each element on Aviva's balance sheet. Additionally, the team was charged with not only evaluating the existing assets and liabilities on Aviva's balance sheet, but also pondering the future operations of the business. Carr was aware that assessing climate risk was a complex task, fraught with its unique set of challenges and limitations. He was prepared to further discuss these issues, as he knew the board would be keen to delve deeper into their intricacies.

Spreadsheet supplement for case 224007.

Jonathan Gray, the head of Digital Assets at NorthCentral Bank, was tasked with deciding how the bank should approach the growing demand for cryptocurrency (crypto) investment products and services. As the fintech industry continued to grow rapidly and younger digital consumers expressed a desire for crypto-friendly products, the bank had to decide how to proceed. Gray considered three options: maintaining the status quo and not offering crypto products; developing investment-only products and services around digital assets; or becoming a meaningful ecosystem player by offering wallets and enabling users to acquire crypto assets and use them natively on blockchains. Each option had its own benefits and risks, and Gray had to decide which path is best for NorthCentral Bank to remain competitive in the rapidly evolving fintech industry.

Case on company using sophisticated AI to convince patients to get kidney disease tests, and their negotiation process with insurance companies.