個案總覽

In August 2019, the leadership of Hester Pharmaceuticals (Hester) had a problem. Italy promised to be a key market for their new breakthrough oncology drug Akrozumab, but for almost two years, its single-payer healthcare system had been unable to agree with Hester on a price. With only a few years before a competing drug to Akrozumab was due to hit the market, company leaders felt mounting pressure to compromise with Italian negotiators. At the same time, they realized that compromising on a low price might jeopardize the higher prices Hester had already negotiated with other European nations, if these countries bought up extra supply from Italy or referenced Italy's low price when they renegotiated their own prices the following year. Should Hester settle for a low price, stall for more time, or walk away? This case introduces students to the process of bringing new prescription drugs to market and the factors that go into pricing drugs in both single-payer and multi-payer healthcare systems. Students will wrestle with the complex strategy behind pricing their drugs internationally.

Founded in 1996, Dalian Leasun Food Co., Ltd. had become one of the largest canned food manufacturers in northeast China by 2020. In 2016, it began a digital transformation, adopting digital technologies such as data mining and cloud computing. The company also revised its internal operations and adopted an omnichannel sales strategy. Digital transformation enabled Dalian Leasun Food Co., Ltd. to move beyond the traditional retail and distribution market, which was becoming oversaturated. Its successful transition also helped the company maintain a stable sales growth rate during the COVID-19 pandemic. The next stage for its digital transition however, presented a dilemma. One option for the chairman of the company was to develop a customer-oriented platform and create value for customers. The other option was to digitalize the company’s supply chain and internal management system. The chairman had to decide which direction to follow.

mPharma pioneered electronic prescriptions in Ghana, and aimed to increase drug affordability and accessibility in Africa, but the company remained unprofitable. Following investor concerns about mPharma's business, CEO Gregory Rockson considered alternative business models and services that could increase mPharma's profitability and impact.

mPharma pioneered electronic prescriptions in Ghana, and aimed to increase drug affordability and accessibility in Africa, but the company remained unprofitable. Following investor concerns about mPharma's business, CEO Gregory Rockson considered alternative business models and services that could increase mPharma's profitability and impact.

The Concorde, a British-French supersonic jet, captured the hearts and minds of aviators, business professionals, and celebrities around the world through its iconic design, superior features, and unique inflight experience. Despite its transcendent appeal, the jet became surrounded by controversy, catastrophe, an environmental movement, and changing consumer trends, all of which led to its grounding in 2003. In almost two decades, no aerospace program had been successful in recreating commercial supersonic air travel. The Concorde's story showed that these non-technical aspects of technology adoption and diffusion were strong enough to force the retirement of a superior, breakthrough technology and replace it with an inferior one. In 2021, did it make sense to aim to commercialize supersonic travel by imitating the good in the Concorde and tweaking the downsides, or was there a hidden reason why the Concorde had failed and supersonic transport had not been recreated?

Late in 2020, ImmunVX, a fictional, multinational vaccine company, was among the leaders in developing a vaccine against the COVID-19 virus. It had accepted several government grants to help with the costs of developing the vaccine more rapidly. The company had a limited in-house manufacturing capacity yet had accepted orders from multiple governments that far exceeded its ability to meet those orders for at least the next three years. The company could increase its output by using contract manufacturing and/or by partnering with another large pharma company, though each option lowered the per-unit profit margin. ImmunVX was proud of its relationships with high-, middle-, and low-income countries and accepted the variable profit margins from these different markets. However, it had taken on significant debt in recent years due to acquisitions and R&D costs. As a consequence, it had incentivized its employees to focus on improved profit margins to repay those debts and improve the equity value to satisfy shareholders. The challenge of this case lies in the discussion of a strategy that reconciles the needs of different stakeholders. An attempt to prioritize stakeholders in a simplistic way illustrates the weakness of thinking in terms of "or" rather than "and". Thinking about "and" reframes the discussion to accept a decrease in short-term profit that might lead to longer-term gains. The case lends itself to a higher-level analysis using the PESTEL (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Ethical and Legal) framework to identify macro-environmental factors that help guide a decision.

In 2020, the legal cannabis industry in the United States was emerging. One large player in the nascent industry was Canopy Growth Corporation (Canopy Growth), a cannabinoid company based in Smiths Falls, Ontario, that grew cannabis and managed a range of cannabis-related brands. In September 2020, Canopy Growth announced a partnership with Martha Stewart that entailed the development of a mix of cannabis edibles and oils for wellness sold under the name Martha Stewart CBD. Although the legal cannabis industry held tremendous promise, there were a wide range of unique challenges associated with selling cannabis products, including regulatory and policy issues, stigmas associated with illegal cannabis, and other more typical issues associated with selling new products such as the need for consumer education. The partners would need to consider how consumers would respond to the Martha Stewart CBD offerings, what specific obstacles they would have to overcome, and what market segment(s) and products they should prioritize.

In 2019, Egon Zehnder chair Jill Ader and CEO Edilson Camara faced a critical question: how should the global executive search firm approach its burgeoning advisory service offering? Since 2003, the firm's advisory practice had grown as a conglomeration of grassroots experiments driven by the enthusiasm of some partners and the needs of some markets. Yet, in 2019, partners' attitudes toward the practice varied greatly, with some viewing advisory as a natural extension of search that would position Egon Zehnder for future growth, and others perceiving it as a risky distraction from the firm's core business. Ader and Camara believed the time was ripe for EZ partners to develop a shared perspective on the future of the practice within the firm.

On July 29, 2020, Jeff Bezos, the founder and chief executive officer of Amazon.com Inc. (Amazon), testified before a United States House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law that was investigating the company for engaging in anti-competitive practices. Although the company offered low prices and did not distort consumer welfare principles despite its large market size, the Committee questioned whether it had exploited its sellers on both Amazon Marketplace and the Amazon Web Services Marketplace. The company was accused of not only exploiting sellers but also using their sales data for developing its private-label brands. As committee members were looking to redefine monopolistic practices, it was also recommended that Amazon should be split to avoid anti-competitive practices. Was it time for Bezos to proactively split Amazon and avoid antitrust actions against his company owing to its market dominance? What could he do to manage antitrust issues against his company?

The case opens in September 2019 as Sacha Poignonnec and Jeremy Hodara, co-founders and co-CEOs of Jumia, the leading Pan-African e-commerce platform, are contemplating the company's path to profitability in the aftermath of a fragile investor sentiment, as the company announced two internal issues in August 2019. The case chronicles the founding and expansion of Jumia and the iterations of its business model and describes its competitive outlook. The case then provides a detailed overview of how Jumia built its three pillars-its marketplace, logistics, and payments arms-and how the co-founders decided on the company's strategic, customer, and product scopes over the seven years in which Jumia spread across 14 countries in Africa since its founding in 2012. The case also provides an overview of Jumia's vertical scope, its technology, marketing, and payments systems, and how the company's localization strategy brings complexities to its business model, as Jumia tries to adopt its approach, website, products, and services to each country to increase profitability. While there is for the most part no single competitor that serves the same geography as Jumia does, Jumia strives to educate the African market about shopping online and overcome various infrastructure problems in the continent to improve its margins and become profitable. While its second quarter 2019 financials show continued GMV and customer growth, the co-founders need to convince investors of the company's path to profitability and answer questions such as: Is Jumia's existing product-service mix and geographical coverage the best use of the company's financial and managerial resources, or does the company need to make some eliminations? Can Jumia's expansive approach be sustainable as the geography becomes more developed and the inevitable specialized players come in?

The COVID-19 pandemic brought enormous disruption to the movie industry, closing theaters indefinitely by mid-March 2020, halting television and film production, and throwing theatrical release schedules into disarray. Shell had assumed the CEO position at NBCUniversal just months before the beginning of the pandemic and now had several important decisions to make. One immediate decision he faced was how to handle the release of Trolls: World Tour, the highly anticipated sequel to a successful animated film, which had been scheduled to premiere in theaters nationwide in early April. Jeff's decision regarding the Trolls distribution strategy would not only impact the sequel's performance but would also likely have a far-reaching impact on the entire film industry, which had seen studios and theaters battle over the length of the theatrical window for decades. With the pandemic weakening the theater industry's bargaining power, had the opportunity finally arrived for film studios to significantly shorten, or even eradicate, the theatrical window?

Aptiv's board must decide whether a joint venture with an auto maker is the right next step in the company's efforts to develop and commercialize a production-ready autonomous driving system. While many commentators believed that Aptiv's self-driving technologies had the potential to revolutionize vehicle use and generate enormous financial returns, the company was in a high-profile and increasingly capital intensive race among some of the world's technology giants to achieve that goal - and much more investment would be needed. As the management team began exploring the possibility of working with a partner to share the costs and accelerate their research and development activities, they turned to the board for strategic guidance. The case describes the role of the board and its Innovation and Technology Committee (ITC) in the company's transformation from a traditional auto parts supplier to a high-technology firm focused on the future of mobility and lays out the factors directors are weighing as they consider the possibility of forming a major joint venture with a vehicle manufacturer.

Aptiv's board must decide whether a joint venture with an auto maker is the right next step in the company's efforts to develop and commercialize a production-ready autonomous driving system. While many commentators believed that Aptiv's self-driving technologies had the potential to revolutionize vehicle use and generate enormous financial returns, the company was in a high-profile and increasingly capital intensive race among some of the world's technology giants to achieve that goal - and much more investment would be needed. As the management team began exploring the possibility of working with a partner to share the costs and accelerate their research and development activities, they turned to the board for strategic guidance. The case describes the role of the board and its Innovation and Technology Committee (ITC) in the company's transformation from a traditional auto parts supplier to a high-technology firm focused on the future of mobility and lays out the factors directors are weighing as they consider the possibility of forming a major joint venture with a vehicle manufacturer.

"We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful." Warren Buffet, 1986 Letter to Shareholders. This investment strategy had proven powerful for Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. It had transformed a bad textile company into a diversified investment company, ranked as the 12th largest company in the world in 2019, right behind Apple. It had made Warren Buffet a billionaire and countless of his shareholders millionaires. At the end of 2019, Berkshire's shareholders included Fidelity Investments and the central bank of Norway. The company's stock was considered the number one retirement stock in America. Amid the 2020 coronavirus pandemic, U.S. financial markets crashed at record speed (-35% between February 12 and March 20, 2020), including the biggest single-day drop ever of -12.9% on March 16, 2020, eclipsing the record of October 28, 1929. Expected to be greedy when others are fearful, Buffet was a net seller of stocks and remained on the sideline during that period. His inaction, combined with an unusually cautionary tone at the annual shareholders' meeting, triggered heavy criticisms. Some of his loyalists sold their stocks. As he was approaching his 90th birthday, many started to wonder whether Warren Buffet had changed his time-tested strategy. Was he disconnected from reality? Was he fearful himself?

The grocery industry was going through a major transformation as a consequence of three major trends - the increasing use of ecommerce and online shopping, the intense rivalry from the hard discounters such as Aldi and Lidl who threatened the already modest margins of the national chains such as Safeway, Kroger, and Wal*Mart, and changing customer demands that emphasized convenience, ubiquity, and variety. It was against that backdrop that Rodney McMullen, CEO of Kroger, initiated the Restock Kroger campaign, a strategic initiative that aimed to digitally transform the entire grocery business. Slated to cost $9b, the initiative was launched in 2017 with four fundamental aims - "redefine the grocery customer experience, expand partnerships to create customer value, develop talent and, living our purpose" . The campaign to transform the company was announced just a few months after Amazon had entered the grocery business with its game-changing acquisition of Whole Foods. The case study follows the execution of the Restock Kroger initiative as it unfolded and highlights the crucial decisions that the company made in its digital transformation journey. In doing so, it offers a snapshot of the partnerships that Kroger has built to gain momentum in the digital realm, how it has tried to leverage modern digital technologies (e.g., AI, big data, predictive analytics) to not only improve the efficiency of its store operations but also to provide superior customer service. As the case closes, the company's business was being challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the rapid transformation strategies that were deployed by its major rivals such as Walmart and Amazon. Thus, the case offers a good platform to explore the process of digital transformation, aligning the strategy of transformation with the customer journey, and balancing the pressures to maintain some of the elements of the legacy retail model while ushering in radically new solutions online.

When Hurricane Sandy struck the mid-Atlantic coast, in October 2012, thousands of Guardian employees in New York and New Jersey were affected, and company headquarters was flooded by five feet of water. Two days later all the team members had been accounted for; some had been put up in hotel rooms, others had been supplied with generators, and Guardian had created a fund to cover employees' hurricane-related costs.That experience taught Mulligan to think even longer-term than she always had: What were all the things that could go wrong, and how could the company protect itself from them? What could go right if Guardian were poised to seize the opportunities presented? Technology became a top priority: The company migrated many applications to the cloud and modernized employee productivity tools. It built a data analytics operation from the ground up and retrained actuaries to be analysts. Working remotely became common at Guardian. And its leaders anticipated two other important issues for organizations: diversity, equity, and inclusion, and the gig economy.

"Co-opetition"--cooperating with a competitor to achieve a common goal or get ahead--has been gaining traction for three decades. Yet many companies are uncomfortable with the concept and bypass the promising opportunities it presents. In this article two professors who helped introduce the approach offer a framework for deciding whether to team up with a rival, drawing on examples from Apple and Samsung, DHL and UPS, Ford and GM, and Google and Yahoo. Their advice: Start by analyzing what each party will do if it chooses not to cooperate and how that will affect industry dynamics. Sometimes working together is a clear win, but even if it isn't, it may still be better than allowing someone else to take your place in the deal--which could leave you at a disadvantage. Next, it's critical to figure out how to cooperate without giving away your "secret sauce"--your current advantages. Once you've done that, you'll need to craft an agreement that clearly outlines the deal's scope, who is in charge, how the arrangement could be unwound if needed, and how gains will be divided. You'll also have to manage resistance within your own firm and alter internal mindsets. Co-opetition requires mental flexibility, but firms that develop it can gain an important edge.

Managing uncertainty has always been part of the executive challenge. But the global pandemic upped the ante significantly: Rarely have leaders been forced to tackle volatility in so many areas all at once. The COVID-19 crisis has underscored just how interconnected people, markets and events have become. The authors-consultants at the Boston Consulting Group-argue that to gain uncertainty advantage, companies need to get better at three things: detecting signals, acting on them and building practices that foster resilience. In the end they show that by tracking signals, visualizing what the world might look like three or five years down the line and imagining what it will take to win in that future, organizations can take uncertainty from a scary abstraction to a practice that energizes their workforce and reshapes performance for years to come.

In the autumn of 2018, Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) was facing a changing and challenging environment. Fintech start-ups were a continuous source of disruption for the past decade, but some of the world's largest technology firms such as Google and Apple were entering the financial space and disrupting banking by disintermediating banks from their customers. TD had to prioritize which services and customer segments to protect from the industry's on-going digital disruption and develop strategies to protect them. TD had to move quickly as the longer the delay, the more opportunity the disruptors had to entrench themselves and siphon away customers. Tim Hogarth, Vice-President of Innovation Framework and Strategies, was leading TD's Innovation Council which was tasked with identifying solutions to the bank's technology challenges. The case focuses on understanding how and why disruption occurs and what an incumbent can do to protect itself. It provides the basis for applying Christensen's insights on disruption, the Diamond-E, Ansoff matrix, and applying the criteria for the make-versus-buy decision, i.e. acquire, partner with or internally develop new technologies.

Semiconductors are the brains of modern electronics. They are used in medical devices, communications, computing, defense, transportation, energy, and technologies of the future such as artificial intelligence, data science, and advanced wireless networks. This case examines the global semiconductor industry and its structure. The case raises several important questions: Is Intel falling behind competitors in the race to make ever more powerful processors? Apple, Amazon, Facebook and other tech firms are designing their own chips - how will this impact the industry? Is the fabless model based on contract manufacturing superior to Intel's model of designing and making its own branded products? Will Chinese companies close the technology gap with firms like TSMC, Samsung, and Intel?