個案總覽

Suitable for graduate level and executive education programs, this undisguised case describes the life of Dennis Paustenbach, president and CEO of ChemRisk, and what, to his mind, is the typical life of a senior executive: many demands on one's time, multiple projects, and serious consequences for inattention, both personally and professionally. This case can be used to teach students about individual behavior, Type A behavior, time and priority management, balancing work and family life, managing performance, managing energy in professional life styles, organizational behavior, and leadership.

This is the first of a three-part case that describes the reaction and attitudes demonstrated by B. Joseph White upon hearing that he was not chosen to be president of the University of Michigan in May of 2002. Joe White responded to this news resiliently by helping the University make a smooth transition to a new president. The case elaborates on Joe White's beliefs about resilience and why he believes resilience is a desirable quality among individuals. Part A sets the stage with the case background.

Supplement to case W88C52. This is the final addition to a three-part case that describes the reaction and attitudes demonstrated by B. Joseph White upon hearing that he was not chosen to be president of the University of Michigan in May of 2002. Joe White responded to this news resiliently by helping the University make a smooth transition to a new president. The case elaborates on Joe White's beliefs about resilience and why he believes resilience is a desirable quality among individuals. Part 3 gives students an overview of White's experience after the decision was made.

Supplement to case W88C52. This is the second of a three-part case that describes the reaction and attitudes demonstrated by B. Joseph White upon hearing that he was not chosen to be president of the University of Michigan in May of 2002. Joe White responded to this news resiliently by helping the University make a smooth transition to a new president. The case elaborates on Joe White's beliefs about resilience and why he believes resilience is a desirable quality among individuals. Part B presents the speech on disappointment that White gave at the Regents dinner.

This case profiles PepsiCo's diversity journey under the leadership of former chairman and CEO Steve Reinemund who instituted diversity as one of the company's strategic imperatives. It demonstrates the ways in which Reinemund partnered with his leadership team and employees throughout the organization to make diversity a key factor in PepsiCo's culture and performance. It also reveals how, regardless of the success, PepsiCo employees were openly speculating what it would mean for the diversity strategy that Reinemund would be turning the helm of PepsiCo over to Indra Nooyi, a 50-year old Indian-born woman, who would need to find her own voice and approach to leading the company and its diversity efforts.

Peter Roberts, CEO of Jones, Lang, LaSalle (JLL) Americas division, has been charged with expanding the company's presence in its core geographic markets while simultaneously growing its corporate account business. Roberts and his task force have narrowed their options to two proposals. The first is an enhancement of the account management model put in place in 2001 where independent service units co-existed with an account management group. The second is a realignment of the firm's operations around geography and key accounts. By examining the tradeoffs required by each option, the case illustrates the tensions involved in structuring an organization around product, geography, and key customers. It also explores the importance of aligning strategic choices with organizational architecture.    

In January 2004, the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies announced that it would reduce its estimate of proved oil reserves by nearly 4 billion barrels, or 20 percent. The announcement set off a series of events, including a drop in the company's share price, internal and external investigations, and the resignation of several senior officers. During this period, details came to light about the sometimes bitter disputes among company officials over its reserve practices. Company officials had to decide what changes to make to restore public confidence in the organization.

Following the revelation that the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies had overstated its proved oil reserves by over 4 billion barrels, company officials announced dramatic changes to the company's organizational structure and governance system. These changes were intended to improve management oversight and long-term corporate performance. This case outlines those changes.

This note was written to help students at the Harvard Business School do a more thorough job of researching a company, utilizing the extensive resources of the Baker Library, as well as other widely available databases. Exhibits provide detailed information on key resources and instructions for accessing prominent databases.

The Barclay family, new owners (in July 2004) of the Telegraph Media Group in London, the United Kingdom, had acquired a great UK newspaper brand but an organization that has lost its customer focus and, by the time of the events described in the case series (2006-2008), an enterprise in an industry facing tectonic plate shifts because of digitization, the Internet, a 24x7 news and information cycle, the advent of citizen journalism, fundamentally changing reader and advertiser behavior and preferences, and a besieged centuries-old print-media business model. (All this without the additional pain of the 2008 global economic downturn and the consequent fall in advertising revenue.) While "change" was not new to the Telegraph Group (it has seen plenty since the Daily Telegraph was first published in 1855), the Barclay family and the Telegraph's new leadership and management team saw the business at a significant transition point with change an urgent imperative. The (A) case, the first of a five-part series, lays out the business and leadership case for change in the context of the Telegraph's 150-plus-year history.

The (B) case, second in a series of five, follows the (A) case which laid out the case for change in the context of the Telegraph's 150-plus-year history and concluded with the senior management's decision to start the change process with the editorial organization and to do so with a change of location from London's Docklands to a former trading floor by Victoria station in Central London. The (B) case describes the changes that would be necessary in the Telegraph's editorial function.

The (C) case, third in a series of five, characterizes the changes implemented in the Telegraph Media Group's editorial function as the group's senior management went about positioning the enterprise for a "giant stride in the media future." The case follows the (A) case, which laid out the case for change, and a follow-up (B) case, which described the editorial changes that necessary for the media group's transition from the 20th to the 21st century.

The (D) case, fourth in a series of five, closes a major loop left open in the preceding (B) and (C) cases, which focused on changes in the editorial organization and operations of the Telegraph Media Group: making the change, which was seen as an imperative in the (A) case, worthwhile by transforming the commercial organization, whose responsibility it is to bring revenue from advertisers and to look for other ways to "monetize" the Telegraph's considerable investment in digitization.

The (E) case, fifth and concluding case in a series of five, has a central message: Organizational leadership must be seen through the lens of "stewardship," and if managers must, as stewards, leave their enterprise in better shape and with a brighter future, then the work of change is never done. In that sense, change at the Telegraph Media Group is not yet done.

In mid-2008, David Miller, the CEO of the Madison Children's Foundation (MCF), is beginning to contemplate the future of the organization. As the founding CEO, Miller has been the face of MCF since its inception in 1993. The foundation has a strong track record of success and has established a reputation as a "change maker" and "partner" in the community, having made grants of more than $60 million to local organizations. Although its grant-making has increased, MCF's staff has not grown over time. The board has changed composition over the past six years, adding more community residents and "working" board members. The board succession plan is fairly well organized, with a nominating committee and a good understanding of skill sets needed and the expectations for board members. However, there is no CEO succession plan. Board members have been raising the question in a non-confrontational manner for the past two or three years, and now Miller believes the time has come to create a CEO succession strategy for MCF. The critical questions raised by this case include: What roles do/should CEOs and boards play in initiating and implementing a leadership succession process? How does the implementation of a leadership succession process affect the senior staff at an organization? How should external stakeholders be engaged in the leadership succession process?

In mid-2008, David Miller, the CEO of the Madison Children's Foundation (MCF), is beginning to contemplate the future of the organization. As the founding CEO, Miller has been the face of MCF since its inception in 1993. The foundation has a strong track record of success and has established a reputation as a "change maker" and "partner" in the community, having made grants of more than $60 million to local organizations. Although its grant-making has increased, MCF's staff has not grown over time. The board has changed composition over the past six years, adding more community residents and "working" board members. The board succession plan is fairly well organized, with a nominating committee and a good understanding of skill sets needed and the expectations for board members. However, there is no CEO succession plan. Board members have been raising the question in a non-confrontational manner for the past two or three years, and now Miller believes the time has come to create a CEO succession strategy for MCF. The critical questions raised by this case include: What roles do/should CEOs and boards play in initiating and implementing a leadership succession process? How does the implementation of a leadership succession process affect the senior staff at an organization? How should external stakeholders be engaged in the leadership succession process?

Shanghai Tang is a luxury brand that focuses on Chinese-inspired fashion, accessories, and home decoration products. In Fall 2008, amidst a growing global economic crisis, Raphael Ie Masne, executive chairman of Shanghai Tang, had to decide what to do with the recently vacant creative director position. Did Shanghai Tang need to hire a new creative director at this uncertain economic time? Or could he take on the role of the creative director himself? In addition, Ie Masne had to grapple with balancing the perennial tensions between business imperatives and the creative aspirations of his designers. How could he better manage employees who see themselves as artists?