學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Tesla's Bid for SolarCity (A)
內容大綱
In October 2016, Tesla asked its shareholders to ratify their $2.4 billion bid for SolarCity. Tesla had announced a series of large projects in the preceding months including the unveiling of the Model 3, the new Solar Roof, and pushing forward the opening of the Gigafactory. All of these projects required high upfront costs, and with SolarCity's debt burden, investors were left questioning whether the acquisition imposes too much financial risk on Tesla as well as the motives behind the move. Weeks prior to the merger, Tesla released its third-quarter financials, which reported record-breaking deliveries, GAAP profits (for the second time in the company's history) of $22 million, and positive free cash flow of $176 million. With Wall Street expecting a loss, these results came as a shock. Yet, questions remained regarding the quality of these earnings, which benefitted from the company's sales of zero emission vehicle tax credits and the cancellation of its resale value guarantee program. With the ISS backing Tesla's merger proposal in the days leading up to the final vote, institutional investors and shareholders wondered whether they should vote for or against the deal.