學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: Coordinating Patient Care
內容大綱
External cost pressures are motivating the adoption of case management (CM) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), but several of the organization's key professional groups are working against it. President and CEO David Dolins must decide whether CM is needed, and whether it is compatible with the employee-and patient-centered culture upon which BIDMC has built its success. CM has been touted in the health-care industry as a way to coordinate the complex, multidisciplinary process of patient care, in hopes of controlling costs without reducing quality. CM creates a new role that stands above the established disciplines--physicians, nurses, and social workers--to coordinate their activities and oversee their performance. The case describes the threat posed by CM to the professional status of physicians, social workers, and nurses. It also explores the coordination mechanisms already in place--care paths, primary nursing, care-management teams, and information systems--and questions whether CM is needed.