學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
High-Ratio Stock Splits: Profit Cultural & Creative Group vs. Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical
內容大綱
This case discusses the phenomenon of high-ratio stock splits in China's capital market. Unlike in the U.S. capital market, where cash dividends are common, high-ratio stock splits in China are often associated with sharp stock price fluctuations and attract close attention from investors, listed companies, and regulators alike. In April 2018, the two Chinese stock exchanges released the most stringent regulations to date to prohibit ineligible companies from carrying out such practices. Nonetheless, there were still many cases where companies found ways to circumvent the rules to continue high-ratio stock splits. In the first half of 2018, Profit Cultural & Creative Group (PCCG) and Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (WolwoPharma) announced a 1.8-for-1 stock split together with a cash dividend of ¥0.25 per share and a 1.8-for-1 stock split together with a cash dividend of ¥0.4 per share, respectively. Although the stock prices of both companies went up initially after the announcement, the prices moved in the opposite direction after the ex-rights date. What were the motivations behind the listed companies' high-ratio stock splits? Why did the stock prices of the two companies show different patterns after the stock split? How should investors respond to high-ratio stock splits?