學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Handspring and Palm, Inc: A Corporate Drama in Five Acts
內容大綱
Follows Jeff Hawkins, Donna Dubinsky, and, later, Ed Colligan from the founding of Palm, Inc., through the founding of Handspring, to the point that Handspring and Palm began considering a merger. Examines the conditions that drove the two rival companies toward a merger. In a relatively stagnant market for personal technology, Handspring lacked the financial resources to launch its next-generation product, the Treo 600; meanwhile, Palm's market position was threatened by a lack of breakthrough product innovation and viable growth plans. From the date of its founding, Handspring nurtured a rivalry with its chief competitor, Palm, Inc. By early 2003, Palm, Inc. had stabilized its business, while Handspring found itself in a dire financial situation. Handspring pursued two financing alternatives: a PIPE and a merger with Palm--engendering two different operating states for the company. The board of directors and management team were fairly evenly split between the two deals, each of which involved uncertainty.