學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Inciting a Computer Revolution in Health Care: Implementing the Health Information Technology Act
內容大綱
This case, ideal for strategic leadership classes, poses the question: given the ambitious goals of the 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act and the hurdles to its successful implementation, how should incoming National Coordinator for Health Information Technology David Blumenthal proceed? The case describes Blumenthal's resources, most notably: *$27 billion in Medicare and Medicaid incentives to hospitals, physicians, and other eligible providers who invested in ""certified"" electronic health systems *$2 billion in other funds to address specific obstacles to widespread acquisition of health IT systems. *Broad regulatory authority to define ""meaningful use"" and set certification criteria. It also describes Blumenthal's major challenge: to persuade thousands of hospitals and hundreds of thousands of doctors that health IT systems were worth the time and trouble it would take to buy them and integrate them into daily clinical practice. Small, cash-strapped community hospitals and individual practitioners constituted a particular concern. Finally, it describes the nature of Blumenthal's regulatory task: to define meaningful use quickly and to strike the right balance. Define meaningful use too strictly, and large numbers of health care providers might turn down the proffered incentives. Define it too loosely, and the expensive federal initiative would deliver little more than the market would have produced anyway. The case may be used on its own. It may also be used as the second part of a two-case unit with HKS Case 1937.0. This case includes an 8:00 min. video where David Blumenthal talks about challenges he faced, in particular when dealing with individual practitioners who didn't have the bandwidth to adopt electronic health records. Blumenthal explains the arguments he used to persuade them, and reflects more broadly on the timing and stages of this transition to "get information flowing in the healthcare system.