學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
LandLease (Asia) Property Limited: Redefining Real Estate Investment Strategies
內容大綱
Set in 2003, this case presents the relative merits and demerits of direct and indirect methods of international property investment from the perspective of an Australian property company, LandLease (Asia) Property Ltd. (LL). It wished to gain exposure to the Hong Kong property sector and had the option of investing directly by acquiring real property assets or indirectly by acquiring interests in investment vehicles whose underlying investment performance was linked to the property sectors. LL was particularly interested in creating an investment portfolio and listing it as a REIT in Hong Kong. Compares and contrasts the most common forms and strategies of real estate investment. The relative attractiveness of direct and indirect international property investments will depend on the requirements, objectives, and financial strength of the investors. Despite differences in the underlying asset base and quality, direct and indirect investments are not mutually exclusive.