學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Merrill Lynch's Asset Write-Down
內容大綱
Since late 2003, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc ("Merrill Lynch") had become the world's largest underwriter of collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs"). The assets of CDOs comprised some of the riskiest tranches of mortgage-backed securities mostly tied to subprime mortgages. With the collapse of the subprime mortgage market and declining liquidity in the summer of 2007, Merrill Lynch was caught with a substantial number of CDOs that had diminished sharply in value. Disillusioned with chief executive Stanley O'Neal's leadership, the management of Merrill Lynch called for a series of meetings to assess the firm's exposure to subprime-backed CDOs and redefine its risk-management strategy. To the management, an embarrassing write-down seemed inevitable for the third quarter of 2007, but how much of such assets should be written down and how quickly? What would be the implications for the firm in making such an announcement?