學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Capability Development For Growth: Leverage Strengths or Build Competencies at VA Tech Wabag?
內容大綱
VA Tech Wabag, an Indian MNC firm was an industry leader in total water management. The case presents an alternative method of talent development that focuses on leveraging an individual's strengths against the practice of focusing on functional and behavioral competencies and develops training need analysis (TNA). This approach appears to be contrary to the ongoing deficit culture, which concentrates on weaknesses. The HR head of the organization resists the paradigm shift in the approach to capability development. The case addresses three principal issues. 1. Understanding the strengths-based approach to capability building 2. Clarifying the competency-based approach to talent management 3. Building leadership capabilities by understanding and leveraging individual strengths and appreciating the role of competencies in enabling success. All of this raises the question of the role of competency frameworks, the TNA approach's limitations, and synergizing both ideologies. Some specific questions raised by this case are: Is it possible to build capability by adopting either approach? What are the challenges of adopting strengths-based approach for recruitment? How can the organization leverage team strengths? Understanding these dichotomies can help L&D functions manage the best out of their talent and build effective leaders.