學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
The Nature Centre at Mont Saint-Hilaire: How Far?
內容大綱
The Nature Centre was a non-profit organization created in 1972 to manage public outreach and access in the Gault reserve on the Mt St-Hilaire mountain, 40 km south of Montreal. Beyond conservation and recreation, the 2001 new mission included the promotion of the conservation of the region's natural environment. The inclusion of this new regional focus led to the recruitment of Marc-André Guertin and the creation of the Conservation Team. The case introduced the challenge faced in early 2006 by Marc-André Guertin, Project Coordinator of the Conservation Team at the Nature Centre when he received a contract proposal for a biodiversity assessment to be conducted in a regional municipal county located 58 km away, i.e., far out of the Nature Centre's usual scope of action. He was considering this decision based on (1) the broader context of the organization's mission, (2) the management of his team, (3) the scientific value of this assessment for his team, and last, (4) the financial dimension of this assessment on his team's tight resources