學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
She Grabbed His What? A Personnel Manager's Dilemma - Case A
內容大綱
Nick Barr was the Personnel Manager for National Processing Inc. -- an 80-year old company and one of Canada's leading industrial processors. Barr, a recent graduate in Industrial Relations Management with very little job experience, was hired to manage National's 530 unionized employees. In his first year on the job, Barr encounters a particularly challenging case involving a sexual harassment complaint. One day a young, male employee went to Barr's office and reported that his female co-workers were sneaking up behind him and grabbing his testicles. After learning about this concerning behavior, Barr must decide what to do. A number of things factor into his decision including the safety and psychological welfare of the employee and his co-workers as well as Barr's responsibilities to the company and his personal reputation and job security. In Case A, the employee's experience is described. In Case B, it is revealed that Barr decides to conduct an informal investigation and finds that the employees are playing a 'grabbing' game. Barr is shocked to learn this and has to decide how to proceed with the complaint.