學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Designing a Surgical Quality Improvement Project at Eastern State Medical Center
內容大綱
This case considers the challenges, benefits, and costs of hospital participation in a widely recognized surgical quality improvement benchmarking program. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) issues performance reports twice a year to participating hospitals, creating benchmarks based on data submitted by over 500 hospitals. NSQIP claims that participation reduces surgical complications. The protagonist, the Chief of General Surgery at a large academic medical center, faces skepticism about the value of the report on two fronts: from some surgeons on his staff and from a statistician he consults. Some of the hospital surgeons find the data difficult to interpret, and question their utility in focusing quality improvement interventions. The statistician has reservations about the validity of the statistical results as a basis for action. The chief must decide if and how the NSQIP report can be used to improve quality. In the coming era of value-based purchasing initiatives for hospitals, the chief also needs to be concerned about how payers might interpret this data as they develop payment systems that reflect available measures of surgical quality.