學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Massachusetts Health Policy Commission: Innovation Through the CHART Investment Program
內容大綱
In mid-September 2014, the Executive Director of the Health Policy Commission (HPC), an independent state agency in Massachusetts, assessed the proposals submitted by 27 hospitals for projects to be funded from $60m available under Phase 2 of the Community Hospital Acceleration, Revitalization, and Transformation (CHART) Investment Program. The HPC needed to fund projects that would meet the requirements of the CHART program: "to support the Commonwealth's goals to improve the health of its residents, improve the access and quality of care, including patient experience, and reduce the health care cost growth." The HPC had tried to help the eligible community hospitals develop strong, clearly defined projects for Phase 2, building on what they had learned during Phase 1 of the program. The RFP itself contained more detailed requirements than the earlier RFP, and the agency had tried to provide additional guidance by developing FAQs and holding information sessions during the RFP preparation period. Had it worked? What options did the HPC have at this point in the granting cycle to tighten up these projects and ensure that the funds would be used effectively and well?