學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
When Expertise Becomes a Liability
內容大綱
The most critical function of every executive team is to make decisions that benefit an organization in the long term. Most of us would imagine that the more domain experts there are in a particular group, the better: their collective knowledge of risks and opportunities in a particular industry will surely lead to effective long-term decision making. The authors show that this reasoning is flawed. They describe their research, which indicates that in certain circumstances, groups that are dominated by domain experts may exhibit three harmful tendencies that actually detract from effective decision making, including over-confidence and 'cognitive entrenchment'.