學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Decision Making: It's Not What You Think
內容大綱
This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. Renowned management thinker Henry Mintzberg and business professor Frances Westley zero in on three ways the best managers make decisions. To hone their decision-making skills, business leaders can start by admitting that real-world decisions are not always made through logical steps--and that often they shouldn't be. Most managers believe they make decisions by using analysis. Define the problem, they say, diagnose its causes, design possible solutions, choose and, finally, implement the choice. But they may make their best decisions in some other way--for example, after a flash of intuition or by trying out several things and keeping what works. The authors show that a focus on "thinking first" before choosing may interfere with a deep understanding of the issues dividing people and prevent a good decision. A decision-making approach the authors call "seeing first"--literally creating a picture with others to see everyone's concerns--can surface differences better than analysis and can force a genuine consensus. "Doing first"--going ahead with an action to learn--is the third approach. Each route is best under particular circumstances. Thinking first works best when the issue is clear, data are reliable, the context is structured, thoughts can be pinned down, and discipline can be applied--for example, in an established production process. Seeing first works best when many elements must be combined into creative solutions, commitment to those solutions is key, and communication across boundaries is essential--for example, in new-product development. Doing first works best when the situation is novel and confusing, when complicated specifications might get in the way, and a few simple relationship rules could help people move forward--for example, when companies face a disruptive technology.