學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
Accounting For the Collapse of Dick Smith
內容大綱
In August 2019, Oliver Jones, senior manager at the New South Wales Institute of Qualified Accountants, was following the case of the insolvency of Dick Smith Group. The company began when the founder started servicing radios and expanded to carry a wide range of electronics products. Over the years, the competitive consumer electronics industry saw Dick Smith undergo several strategic changes. The founder had sold the company to Woolworths before the supermarket retailer decided to exit the consumer electronics business. After private equity firm Anchorage turned the company around and sold it for a profit in 2014, Dick Smith again experienced financial troubles. Management had bought too much inventory, chose the wrong products to buy and ultimately assumed too much debt during its expansion phase. In 2016, Dick Smith went bankrupt. Subsequently, creditors began litigation against top Dick Smith executives for pursuing a "rebate maximising" strategy that prioritised rebates over customer demand. The auditor was also implicated. While Jones was unsure if the auditor was legally responsible for investor losses, he wondered how they had not found any risks worth flagging.