學門類別
哈佛
- General Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship
- International Business
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations Management
- Strategy
- Human Resource Management
- Social Enterprise
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Information Technology
- Negotiation
- Business & Government Relations
- Service Management
- Sales
- Economics
- Teaching & the Case Method
最新個案
- A practical guide to SEC ï¬nancial reporting and disclosures for successful regulatory crowdfunding
- Quality shareholders versus transient investors: The alarming case of product recalls
- The Health Equity Accelerator at Boston Medical Center
- Monosha Biotech: Growth Challenges of a Social Enterprise Brand
- Assessing the Value of Unifying and De-duplicating Customer Data, Spreadsheet Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise, Data Supplement
- Building an AI First Snack Company: A Hands-on Generative AI Exercise
- Board Director Dilemmas: The Tradeoffs of Board Selection
- Barbie: Reviving a Cultural Icon at Mattel (Abridged)
- Happiness Capital: A Hundred-Year-Old Family Business's Quest to Create Happiness
EOH Holdings Ltd.: From Blacklist to Market Confidence through Corporate Structure and Governance
內容大綱
The share price of EOH Holdings Ltd. (EOH), a company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and Africa's largest technology service provider, decreased by over 30 per cent in December 2017 following allegations of fraud in relation to a corporate action within the group. Despite strong denials by the then-group chief executive officer (CEO), Zunaid Mayet, EOH's market value continued to plummet, from a peak of 22 billion South African rand to 4 billion. In September 2018, Mayet was replaced as group CEO by Stephen van Coller, a former banker and telecommunications executive, who recruited a new executive team, replaced the board, and contracted out an unfettered internal corruption investigation. By June 2020, van Coller was wondering whether he and his management team had done enough to prove to the market that EOH was an organization once again worthy of trust and investment. Had they taken sufficient steps to restore EOH's reputation? Had they earned the right to push the board to approve the next phase of EOH's turnaround?