個案總覽

The "Carbon Credit Negotiation" explores the negotiation between Eclipse Climate, a European carbon trading firm, and Alpha Air, a Denver-based airline. It focuses on Eclipse Climate's efforts to sell carbon credits to Alpha Air as part of their strategy to achieve net-zero emissions. As businesses work to reduce their carbon footprint, there are other emerging strategies to offset emissions using carbon credits. It is becoming increasingly strategic for large companies to purchase carbon credits through a carbon broker that manages complex carbon projects and organizes them into investment portfolios as carbon credits in one-ton increments. These portfolios can be organized by the amount and complexity of technology used for carbon capture; typically either Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) or Technology-Based Solutions (TBS). The negotiation looks at the complexities of carbon markets and the strategies used in carbon credit trading, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in achieving environmental sustainability goals in corporate settings.

The "Carbon Credit Negotiation" explores the negotiation between Eclipse Climate, a European carbon trading firm, and Alpha Air, a Denver-based airline. It focuses on Eclipse Climate's efforts to sell carbon credits to Alpha Air as part of their strategy to achieve net-zero emissions. As businesses work to reduce their carbon footprint, there are other emerging strategies to offset emissions using carbon credits. It is becoming increasingly strategic for large companies to purchase carbon credits through a carbon broker that manages complex carbon projects and organizes them into investment portfolios as carbon credits in one-ton increments. These portfolios can be organized by the amount and complexity of technology used for carbon capture; typically either Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) or Technology-Based Solutions (TBS). The negotiation looks at the complexities of carbon markets and the strategies used in carbon credit trading, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in achieving environmental sustainability goals in corporate settings.

The "Carbon Credit Negotiation" explores the negotiation between Eclipse Climate, a European carbon trading firm, and Alpha Air, a Denver-based airline. It focuses on Eclipse Climate's efforts to sell carbon credits to Alpha Air as part of their strategy to achieve net-zero emissions. As businesses work to reduce their carbon footprint, there are other emerging strategies to offset emissions using carbon credits. It is becoming increasingly strategic for large companies to purchase carbon credits through a carbon broker that manages complex carbon projects and organizes them into investment portfolios as carbon credits in one-ton increments. These portfolios can be organized by the amount and complexity of technology used for carbon capture; typically either Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) or Technology-Based Solutions (TBS). The negotiation looks at the complexities of carbon markets and the strategies used in carbon credit trading, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in achieving environmental sustainability goals in corporate settings.

The case focuses on the required financing for a new building for Wabanaki Maple, founded by Jolene Johnson and located in Tobique, New Brunswick, Canada. Johnson had to prepare financial information in advance of a meeting with an economic development officer from the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) from which she was seeking a loan. ACOA had unique lending programs with more favourable terms (e.g., interest-free, non-repayable loans) for Indigenous businesses. To prepare for the meeting, Johnson had to evaluate the impact of Wabanaki Maple’s production capacity, as it could limit sales growth potential in the near future; assess changes in customer type (e.g., boutique store, big-box retailers) including the impact of cultural priorities and awareness; determine improvements in inventory management; and assess the firm’s ability to pay for financing while generating profits.

Sanjil Shah, Managing Partner of Alignvest Student Housing REIT (ASH), faces the most significant decision thus far in his career: is it the right time to sell the company? Together with his partner Reza Satchu, Shah had developed ASH into the largest student housing platform in Canada in only a few years since its launch. Key to their success was the partners' decision to forego a traditional private equity structure and instead supplement initial investments of their own personal capital with that of high-net-worth individuals and retail investors. Their strategic intuition paid off, helping them emerge strong from the COVID-19 pandemic and eventually, in 2023, receive a buyout offer worth $1.05 billion. The timing was perhaps fortuitous: an increasing housing shortage, a sudden surge in interest rates over market capitalization rates, and brewing restrictions on international students all threatened to curtail further expansion. Factoring in additional pressure from investors, Shah wondered whether it was the right time to exit. And yet, their hypothesis had held strong so far. What if there was still room to grow? What if selling now meant pulling out too early? To sell, or not to sell? That is the question.

Ivan and Dan MacKinnon grew up on a farm in Bath, Ontario, where the brothers learned about the importance of farming and local supply chains. In 2014, the brothers put together their farming assets and brewing and engineering skills and launched their farm-based brewery, MacKinnon Brothers Brewing Company. After nearly 10 years of operations, the MacKinnons were faced with a growth challenge. Should they leverage their farm brewery brand and grow its distribution beyond the local region? Or should they “dig in” on their local farm concept and explore more sustainable growth options in the food and beverage tourism industry?

In March 2023, Gopuff, a player in the quick commerce (Q-commerce) industry, was experiencing intense competition and was also unprofitable. Gopuff’s vertical integration model was different than other e-commerce or marketplace companies like Amazon or Instacart, as it purchased products directly from consumer product companies and wholesalers and stored them in micro-fulfillment centres for quick delivery on demand. The company intended to achieve profitability by reducing spending, scrapping off its lower-performing warehouses, and emphasizing higher-margin revenue streams like advertising. Did Gopuff have a feasible business model? Could it earn a competitive advantage over its competitors? What strategies could its co-founders consider to make Gopuff financially feasible?

In March 2023, Gopuff, a player in the quick commerce (Q-commerce) industry, was experiencing intense competition and was also unprofitable. Gopuff's vertical integration model was different than other e-commerce or marketplace companies like Amazon or Instacart, as it purchased products directly from consumer product companies and wholesalers and stored them in micro-fulfillment centres for quick delivery on demand. The company intended to achieve profitability by reducing spending, scrapping off its lower-performing warehouses, and emphasizing higher-margin revenue streams like advertising. Did Gopuff have a feasible business model? Could it earn a competitive advantage over its competitors? What strategies could its co-founders consider to make Gopuff financially feasible?

Ivan and Dan MacKinnon grew up on a farm in Bath, Ontario, where the brothers learned about the importance of farming and local supply chains. In 2014, the brothers put together their farming assets and brewing and engineering skills and launched their farm-based brewery, MacKinnon Brothers Brewing Company. After nearly 10 years of operations, the MacKinnons were faced with a growth challenge. Should they leverage their farm brewery brand and grow its distribution beyond the local region? Or should they "dig in" on their local farm concept and explore more sustainable growth options in the food and beverage tourism industry?

This case expounds on how Global Technology was established as a supplier in the upstream automotive industry chain and how it competed in a monopolistic market - the Chinese chassis-by-wire market with high technical barriers to entry and already dominant players such as Bosch and Continental enjoying combined share over 90%. It turned out that Global Technology, which epitomized the many tech firms aiming to produce local substitutes, managed to gain a market footing. The case first provides information about the automotive chassis-by-wire industry, ranging from relevant policies and technologies to market size and competitive landscape. It introduces the histories and businesses of major international giants, providing a glimpse into the market environment in which Global Technology was operating. The case also describes the founder Liu Zhaoyong's work experiences and motivations for entrepreneurship and explains why Liu entered the chassis-by-wire arena long dominated by international giants. It then illustrates how Global Technology progressed from 0 to 1 by creating great products to gain customer trust. It ends with a question on the company's current challenge: How should Global Technology compete with established giants in the future?

Cofounders of the Berlin-based startup Bone Brox developed a traditional bone broth made from organic, pasture-fed cattle and free-range chickens. Although they had a polarizing product, the founders tapped into the health and awareness trend and managed to gain market attention and secure government funding. The startup defined itself with a flat hierarchy, open communication, and shared decision-making. However, the company faced challenges, such as the impact of a flat hierarchy on business success and efficient decision-making, a highly competitive market, and the COVID-19 pandemic crisis.

Cofounders of the Berlin-based startup Bone Brox developed a traditional bone broth made from organic, pasture-fed cattle and free-range chickens. Although they had a polarizing product, the founders tapped into the health and awareness trend and managed to gain market attention and secure government funding. The startup defined itself with a flat hierarchy, open communication, and shared decision-making. However, the company faced challenges, such as the impact of a flat hierarchy on business success and efficient decision-making, a highly competitive market, and the COVID-19 pandemic crisis.

<div style="font-size: 0.94em; line-height: 1.4;"><p align="justify">This case examines the innovation path in the entrepreneurial journey of Liu Feng, founder of Nanjing Kuickwheel Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (Kuickwheel), a high-tech company established in 2014 in China’s Jiangsu Province. Aspiring to become a provider of short-distance travel solutions with advanced software and hardware, Kuickwheel was committed to building a user-preferred travel mode with a 5 km range. In 2022, Liu was considering the best way of addressing intrapreneurship processes to develop Kuickwheel’s next generation of products to take advantage of the opportunities presented in the smart travel market. Liu was a serial entrepreneur and had created several previous businesses. How could this experience help him identify and realize the next electric scooter opportunity?

Phumlaphi Rita Zwane, founder of Busy Corner, a thriving Shisanyama (African barbeque) business in Thembisa, South Africa, faced a pivotal decision amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Motivated by aspirations for business expansion and the pursuit of new opportunities, Zwane established a company-owned restaurant in the Mall of Thembisa. However, insufficient consideration of crucial factors during the decision-making process led to an alarming debt of $825,971, as of February 18, 2023, posing a significant threat to the business's survival. At this juncture, Zwane grappled with the dilemma of whether to close, sell, or franchise the Thembisa Busy Corner location, underscoring the critical need for a strategic resolution to secure the future of her entrepreneurial venture.

In June 2021, Mumbai-based WhatKnot Wedding Photography faced a critical decision between pursuing high-value celebrity weddings or maintaining their focus on mid-size clients. A potential celebrity wedding contract posed a significant opportunity for both revenue and exposure. However, this venture required extensive senior management involvement, redirection of resources, and potential strain on existing client relationships. The company's co-founders held opposing views: while one favoured consolidating their position in the mid-size market, prioritizing stability, and client relationships, the other advocated for pursuing high-value contracts to gain prominence and higher revenue. The dilemma highlighted the trade-off between pursuing high-value opportunities and maintaining existing business models. This decision would shape the company's future direction and market positioning, with implications for both short-term gains and long-term sustainability.

At a conference in November 2020, the chief executive officers (CEOs) of two exceptional healthcare start-ups-AliveCor Inc. (AliveCor) and Neurobit Inc. (Neurobit)-discussed their paths to innovation: AliveCor, a trailblazing health tech company, had emerged in 2011 with electrocardiogram (ECG) hardware and software that had since garnered global recognition. Neurobit, a digital health start-up, entered the scene in 2018 with sleep biomarker-based health analytics that could predict adverse cardiopulmonary or neurological outcomes. As the CEOs shared their stories, common challenges emerged regarding data acquisition, privacy concerns, and regulatory compliance. Amid their successes, the two companies experienced the necessity of addressing data challenges to achieve AI's full potential in healthcare. They made trade-offs between time and resources amid a rapidly evolving industry and employed various strategies and solutions, from academic collaborations to extensive data collection, in their quest to determine the best strategy to use to overcome the challenges of efficiently and cost-effectively acquiring and utilizing data to drive innovation and gain a competitive edge.

Anchal Abrol and Priya Puri faced a dilemma of enticing their children to eat nutritious food. In 2019, they decided to pool all their savings to launch Snaqary. The company’s clever recipes, inspired by traditional Indian wisdom, focused on nutritious ingredients such as multigrain without compromising taste. Though organic growth met initial expectations, the time to launch the brand into the next orbit was upon them when they realized the need to generate a strong preference and pull for the brand to be able to command a position in the grocery retail system. It was March 2023, and they were planning the following year's strategy. Snaqary wanted to scale up and make the brand attractive to investors.