學門類別
最新個案
- Leadership Imperatives in an AI World
- Vodafone Idea Merger - Unpacking IS Integration Strategies
- V21 Landmarks Pvt. Ltd: Scaling Newer Heights in Real Estate Entrepreneurship
- Snapchat’s Dilemma: Growth or Financial Sustainability
- Did I Just Cross the Line and Harass a Colleague?
- Predicting the Future Impacts of AI: McLuhan’s Tetrad Framework
- Porsche Drive (A) and (B): Student Spreadsheet
- Porsche Drive (B): Vehicle Subscription Strategy
- TNT Assignment: Financial Ratio Code Cracker
- Winsol: An Opportunity For Solar Expansion
Chinese State-Owned Enterprises in Africa: Myths and Realities
內容大綱
Though China’s foreign investment in Africa is still relatively small, it is growing at a phenomenal rate and attracting international attention. Investment is especially pronounced in the mining and energy sectors, as China consumes a quarter of the world’s annual production of minerals and Africa accounts for thirty per cent of the world’s mineral reserves. This article views China’s foreign investment in Africa through the lens of the mining industry and argues that supply and demand considerations, not political factors, are the primary drivers of Chinese investment. China has designated seven Special Economic Zones in Africa that make broad contributions to economic development in various countries by supporting industries ranging from seafood processing to the production of ceramics, textiles, medicines, and furniture. Various large infrastructure projects exist, like the 2008 Sicomines resource-for-infrastructure deal in the Democratic Republic of Congo. With $6 billion earmarked for road, railway, and water projects, it will represent the largest infrastructure upgrade in Congo since colonization. Western investors, meanwhile, face pressure from shareholders to keep activities focused and are narrower in their infrastructural contributions. On the negative side, Chinese state-owned enterprises are insufficiently transparent (e.g. in the reporting of local tax payments). Their environmental record invites scrutiny, and some critics argue that Chinese SOEs show a laissez-faire attitude and exploit weak institutional structures. Ultimately, the reality of Chinese foreign investment in Africa is neither one of “saints nor sinners.”