Following its official launch on April 6, 2020, Quibi, a mobile-only short-form video streaming platform that had raised over $1.7 billion had failed to gain the traction it was expecting and fell well short of its first-year growth projections. The company ultimately announced that it was shutting down after just six months in October 2020. Exactly where had Quibi gone wrong, and what lessons could investors learn from their failed investment in the company?
Food safety and fraud were long-standing issues in China. For some imported products, such as Australian beef steak, food fraud could be a massive issue: consumers could purchase the wrong or even harmful products, and legitimate brands subsequently lost sales and reputation. BeefLedger Ltd. (BeefLedger) was an Australian blockchain start-up company that aimed to solve these issues by using blockchain technology to supply authentic beef products to customers in China and elsewhere. The technology also significantly improved transparency in the beef supply chain. Since 2017, BeefLedger had gained important experience in this area and achieved a certain level of success. The concept of blockchain, proposed in late 2008 and used successfully used in finance since then, was still in its infancy in other areas. The next promising field to adopt blockchain was supply chain management, where the technology had the potential to revolutionize the supply chain with its unique functions, including immutability and decentralization. However, many challenges emerged for BeefLedger during blockchain implementation-especially in early 2020, because of the COVID-19 pandemic and Australia-China tensions. BeefLedger now had to determine how to handle these recent challenges.
Rodey Wing, a partner at global management consulting firm Kearney, had to decide what to recommend to a struggling retailer client with over 200,000 employees. With the client's optometry division suffering from an excess of employees partly due to a pandemic downturn, Wing had initially planned to cut 1,500 employees from the division---laying off those with the lowest performance review ratings. However, a disproportionate impact assessment of the plan showed that employees from protected classes would make up a much larger share of terminated employees than expected. Wing had to determine how this information should impact his recommendations to the important client.
In fall 2021, start-up Rivian was poised to begin delivery of its first electrical vehicles (EVs) to external customers after several delays. The company had over 70,000 preorders for its R1T (pickup truck) and R1S (SUV) models. On November 11, the company went public, raising approximately $12 billion in the largest US IPO since Facebook. Early investors were bullish on Rivian. The company's success would depend in part on the availability of charging stations. Rivian had plans to establish two networks of chargers in the United States and Canada. Rivian Adventure Network would be a network of Level 3 DC fast chargers, while Rivian Waypoints would be Level 2 AC chargers. The company had announced that it wanted to establish these networks in locations near national parks and locales it expected its customers to visit. Rivian was targeting consumers who were outdoor enthusiasts. The case describes EV charging options and challenges students to determine where Rivian should locate its charging stations, how many were needed, and what types were best to serve consumers traveling the 469-mile Blue Ridge Parkway. Ultimately, this is not simply a problem seeking an "optimized solution" given predicted demand, but one that will fundamentally shape emerging consumer behavior. This case is taught in Operations Management, a required first-year course at Darden School of Business. It can also be used in a second-year elective course that explores the major issues and managerial concepts relating to strategic management of the operations function in today's global economy. The set includes a series of short video interviews with the case protagonist.
The ability to communicate an action plan through writing is essential for advancing ideas, earning credibility, and garnering support. Research has shown that leaders who write formal plans are more likely to execute successfully-written plans help members of an organization focus on common goals and the allocation and coordination of resources. Organizations have increasingly required employees to write memos as supplements (or replacements) to presentations (e.g., Amazon's Jeff Bezos and Tesla's Elon Musk banned the use of slides in internal meetings and, instead, mandated "memo-only" policies). Unlike presentations, where information is often listed as bullet points, action-planning memos include more detail and context. They also serve as intellectual assets that can help team members learn from success and failure. This Note explains how to write an effective action-planning memo. It consists of four parts: (1) when to write a memo versus other forms of communication; (2) key components of an action-planning memo; (3) tips for writing a memo; and (4) avoiding common traps. The Note is designed for use by both students and executives. Instructors can assign the Note to help their students develop writing skills needed for classroom assignments. Executives will find it useful for honing their written communication skills.
PittaRosso, a traditional Italian shoe retailer, is implementing an AI system to provide pricing and promotion recommendations. The system allows them to implement changes that would affect both the top of funnel and bottom of funnel activities for the company: once the objective function was defined, they could plan the season and choose which products to markdown and by how much, which additional promotions to apply and when, and how much to spend on online marketing. But what was the right objective function? Should they focus on revenues, margins, or the sell through of older inventory? Each department had different views. The case supplement spreadsheet contains a simplified version of the AI system to allow students to examine the effect of different strategic and tactical decisions and make data informed choices and arguments, in addition to the information provided in the case.
In 2020, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, a Fortune 50 company in the drug distribution industry, agreed to settle thousands of lawsuits filed nationwide against the company for its opioid distribution practices that critics alleged had contributed to the nationwide opioid crisis. The $6.6 billion global settlement, had caused a net loss larger than the cumulative net income earned under the current CEO since he took the helm in 2011. The legal troubles had been accompanied by initiatives by shareholder activists who had become increasingly successful in driving corporate governance changes in companies in the opioid supply chain, including AmerisourceBergen. Determined to hold the leadership accountable, these shareholders launched a campaign in early 2021 to reject the pay packages of the Company's executives. They were protesting the increase in pay in 2020 to $13.3 million, up from $11.3 million in 2019. The result of the Vote NO campaign was almost split down the middle, with 48% voting with the activists and 52% with the company. The case describes the drug distribution industry, internal controls at Amerisource, shareholder demands on corporate governance, and the events related to the opioid crisis and Amerisource's role in it. The case can be used for a wide range of teaching purposes to discuss issues relating to governance, compliance, executive compensation, and shareholder activism in the context of the one of the biggest social challenges of the past two decades-the opioid crisis.
To get more from your innovation efforts, you must first know what type of change you want to achieve, whether it be strengthening the trajectory of your existing path or fundamentally reinventing your business. The authors identify the forms of innovation well suited for each of the three primary types of strategic innovation and suggest specific strategies to help businesses achieve their goals.
Set in July 2021, this case talks about the launch and discontinuation of the very large aircraft, A380, by leading aircraft manufacturer Airbus. The development of the A380 had been motivated by two key factors - the projected market trend of increased hub-and-spoke travel and the success of Boeing 747 - a very large aircraft by Boeing. Although the A380 was the biggest passenger aircraft ever built, with avant-garde technology and reconfigurable design, it failed to succeed due to changing industry trends. Hub airports were witnessing increasing traffic congestion, and more and more airlines were switching to point-to-point travel to avoid hubs altogether. Demand for very large aircrafts like the A380 fell by almost 92% from 2010 to 2020, and Airbus had to make the harsh decision of shutting down the aircraft's production in 2021. The case describes the high stake decision behind the development of the A380 and how it fared after its launch. It also elaborates the duopoly between Boeing and Airbus, which accounted for 91% of the commercial aircraft market share. The case ends with forward-looking questions on what strategies Airbus can implement after the demise of the A380 to compete with long-standing rival Boeing and new entrants like Chinese aircraft manufacturers in a cut-throat market that was witnessing the commencement of environmentally friendly aircraft projects by the two leading players as the new battlefield.
The Strategic Preparation Workbook guides students in preparing for a work or life negotiation so that they are more likely to succeed in negotiations. The Workbook outlines a four-part process in preparing for a negotiation and finishes with action planning. The instructor can either teach the Workbook using a case example or by having students fill out the Workbook with their own negotiation examples. Brief videos (- 3 minutes) linked throughout the Workbook provide detailed descriptions of each step in the process and examples of real-life negotiations. Case Number 2230.0
In January 2021, Kwek Hong Sin, a Singaporean, attended a crowdfunding roadshow. She had been captivated by Thailand's retail environment and founded the crowdfunding platform Sinwattana in 2012 to help Thai businesses, particularly SMEs, raise capital. SMEs constituted over 99% of all enterprises in Thailand, and many were unable to borrow from banks because of strict lending requirements. These businesses suffered from the lack of government support, limited marketing skills and inadequate skilled labour. However, Kwek felt that Thai businesses were worth investing in. Crowdfunding would allow them to issue debt or equity directly to individual investors, including those overseas. Sinwattana provides consultation services to help companies succeed, and also offers business insights to prospective investors. The Sinwattana platform allows these stakeholders to connect; it provides companies with much needed capital and investors with attractive returns they might not have access to elsewhere.
In 2016, Peter Keith and his cofounders started Meuwly's Ltd. (Meuwly's) as a subscription food-box service, and in 2018, they established a physical presence in one of the liveliest locations in downtown Edmonton, Alberta. The expansion diversified the company's revenue streams, including retail, wholesale, special events, and subscription sales. The company strove to be sustainable, but faced a number of challenges. First, customers valued the sustainable, "eat-local" ethos of Meuwly's locally sourced products but not its single-use product packaging, which failed to reflect the company's sustainability goals; Meuwly's experimented with alternatives, but these compromised the product quality customers expected. Second, the company's commitment to paying employees above minimum wage affected its profit margins and financial resources and constrained its availability to pursue sustainability initiatives. Third, misleading industry marketing pervaded the delicatessen market, compromising growth and pricing strategies. Finally, the local delicatessen market was saturated and very competitive. In November 2019, Keith faced important questions regarding the future direction of the company's sustainability strategy: how could he design an appropriate stage-two sustainability strategy for Meuwly's while retaining the company's loyal customer base?
In 2019, the chairman and chief executive officer of Valeo, an automotive supplier and partner to automakers worldwide, faced the challenges of maintaining the company’s speed of growth and balancing its growth with profitability. Valeo had started as a small automobile component manufacturer in 1923 in France. By 2019, however, it was partnering with automakers to design innovative solutions for smart mobility with a focus on intuitive driving and reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Valeo had grown not only organically, but also through partnerships and acquisitions, which enabled it to develop new technologies and new markets. What should the chairman and chief executive officer do to achieve the twin challenges of maintaining the company’s speed of growth and balancing growth with profitability, while not losing sight of the three current automotive revolutions—vehicle electrification, vehicle autonomy, and digital mobility?
The chief executive officer of Ruaha Farm (T) Ltd (Ruaha Farm), in Iringa, Tanzania, established his honey business, in 2012. The company’s business model relied on the engagement and empowerment of neighbouring communities of low-income beekeepers, creating mutually beneficial relationships with local beekeeping communities in the Iringa region. The business model was unique, asset-light, and scalable. In contrast with an integrated business model in beekeeping, where a company typically owned all assets (land, beehives, processing machinery, and routes to market), Ruaha Farm not only commercialized the honey from its own farms but also reached out to all beekeepers in the region to support them in the production and collection of their honey. By 2019, amid the challenges of managing the company’s relationship with the beekeeper communities, the chief executive officer had to consider how to increase Ruaha Farm’s annual production volume from 10 to 100 tons in five years.
Sirona Hygiene Private Limited (Sirona Hygiene) started operations in 2015 with its launch of PeeBuddy—a portable urination device for women. For Sirona Hygiene, the first four years had been extremely satisfying, as the company was able to launch five unique products and 15 differentiated products across its three brands—PeeBuddy, Sirona, and BodyGuard. Each brand had its own unique value proposition and operated in a different product space. The company’s founder was looking for additional funding as he moved toward achieving his mission of tripling the company’s growth by 2022. When it came to investor mindsets, most investors were traditional in their thinking and sought to invest in single brands. As such, the company’s founder was considering consolidating all of the brands under the corporate brand—Sirona Hygiene. Brand articulation, strategy formulation, and fundraising were all interlinked, and to steer the firm to its next journey, a sequential path was imperative. The question was clear, but there were no straight answers.