個案總覽

Namal College, Mainwali - Pakistan, was the brainchild and dream project of Imran Khan-world-renowned cricketer, philanthropist, and one of the most popular politicians of Pakistan. Namal's case opens at a critical juncture in the fall of 2012 when the board meets to discuss the organization's impending challenges, vision, and future. On one hand, Namal's leadership saw commendable achievements in a very short span of time while on the other there were major logistic, financial, infrastructural, and human resource related challenges. In the midst of this, the VC began to openly disagree with Mr. Khan and the board's dreams and ambitions for Namal. This conflict in the perspective of the college's leadership began to instill despair and confusion in the minds of the faculty as well as the students. The question that many were asking was "Where is Namal heading towards?" Namal's vision that had served as the bind¬ing force throughout its history was now being questioned by some. There were rumors that the VC and some of the faculty members were thinking of resigning from the college. Mr. Dawood, the chairperson, felt that it had become extremely important to rethink and clarify Namal's vision for the next 10-20 years. He believed that a well-articulated shorter term vision would enable the Board to address the existing challenges and take the institution forward.

The case documents a board room scenario where the Directors of PEN, a not-for profit organization, have met to re-consider an important decision; either wait for the city government's approval regarding allotment of government schools or consider other options, such as building own schools. Having completed several rounds of unsuccessful negotiations with the City District Government of Lahore (CDGL) the founders are feeling agitated and disappointed. Hence, at this point, the members are considering the organizational models of CARE and TCF; two well-known NGOs of Pakistan, and aim to finalize the strategic decision, based on the assessment of the two organizational models, given PEN's mission, vision, organizational, human resource, and financial capabilities.

This case documents the history and development of philanthropic work in providing quality education by CARE (Cooperation for Advancement Rehabilitation and Education) under the leadership of its chairperson, Seema Aziz. Seema started CARE in 1988 as a small voluntary effort to help the flood victims of the Sheikhupura town, Lahore (Pakistan) and later directed the organization's focus towards providing quality education to underprivileged children. After over a decade of efforts which led to the establishment of 6 CARE owned schools and adoption of 20 schools from the Government of Punjab, Seema was faced with an important decision which would shape the future of CARE. In September 2002, the government of Punjab offered CARE to adopt another 140 government schools. The offer had left Seema at a crossroads as accepting the offer would achieve CARE's mission by accelerating the process of spreading education. However, it would invite challenges associated with managing a rapidly growing organization, providing for additional funds and other organizational resources, and establishing a professional and well motivated Human Resource base to support the expansion decision which would have to be taken within a few months. On the other hand, refusing the government's offer would enable Seema to take CARE through a gradual process of growth ensuring control over policymaking and implementation, minimizing risks related to financial sustainability, building organizational and human resource capacities and above all preparing leadership capabilities necessary for a growing organization. For Seema it was indeed a tough decision. She felt that as she contemplated the offer to prepare CARE to take up the challenge, thousands of children lost hope for basic education and an opportunity to live like the privileged part of the society. While Seema's heart was truly tempted to take up the government's offer, her mind was well aware that she must choose her options wisely.