The forestry industry unit (UFI) of ZENI, an important business area that carried out its own felling operation and featured high levels of investment in timber processing equipment and technology was run by one of the Founder son Patricio Zeni. Despite strong growth in recent years, UFI's profitability had gradually declined, partly due to the domestic economic situation which was marked by cost increases as a consequence of inflation between 15% to 20% annually, with an almost fixed exchange rate and, partly because the industry was becoming more globally competitive, prices in the USA market were set by two major competitors. Although internal operations seemed to run smoothly, General Manager of UFI -Patricio- was sure that better results in terms of profits could be achieved with more accurate diagnosis especially focus in production balance. The case explores whether UFI should implement a pull-based production planning system to improve company commercial performance and meet future demand or a push-based production system to maximize operational efficiency. Also, the case looks into the feasibility of implementing a control and monitoring system with operational indicators to reduce production problems. Finally, the case introduces the concern about the current organizational structure and how to reorganize the planning management function, possibly turning it into an independent area.

By 2008, this rapid growth, compounded by limited installed glass manufacturing capacity at regional levels, had caused local supply shortages. Over the last several years, VASA's progressively deteriorating service had damaged its former reputation for excellent service. The case explores how to reverse a disappointing delivery service that led to angry customers complaining about unfulfilled orders, late deliveries, and accusations from transportation companies that held VASA responsible for these delays. Also these accusations resulted in deterioration in relationships with transportation companies that had done business with VASA for more than 25 years. VASA's CEO, evaluated the following options to recover its reputation: 1) take total control of distribution to customers by developing a VASA-owned delivery service; 2) reverse the situation with transportation companies by requiring them to develop delivery service management capabilities; or 3) replace these transportation companies, partially or totally, with more sophisticated logistic service providers.