學門類別
政大
哈佛
最新個案
- Leadership Imperatives in an AI World
- Vodafone Idea Merger - Unpacking IS Integration Strategies
- Snapchat’s Dilemma: Growth or Financial Sustainability
- V21 Landmarks Pvt. Ltd: Scaling Newer Heights in Real Estate Entrepreneurship
- Predicting the Future Impacts of AI: McLuhan’s Tetrad Framework
- Did I Just Cross the Line and Harass a Colleague?
- TNT Assignment: Financial Ratio Code Cracker
- Porsche Drive (A): Vehicle Subscription Strategy
- Porsche Drive (A) and (B): Student Spreadsheet
- Porsche Drive (B): Vehicle Subscription Strategy
-
PSA Peugeot Citroën: Re-Entering the United States
In 2017, PSA Peugeot Citroën (PSA), the French-based automaker known for its famous Peugeot and Citroën brands, announced its plans to re-enter the U.S. market after having exited North America in 1991. This was not the first time the company tried to re-enter the U.S. market. In an effort to reduce its reliance on declining European markets, PSA had attempted to re-enter the United States in 2003, again in 2014 with its premium automobile range, and most recently in 2016 in a partnership with a French-based ride-sharing operator. What are PSA’s strategic options for its international growth by focusing particularly on U.S. re-entry? Would re-entering the U.S. market help PSA respond to growing competitive pressures in the global automotive industry? -
Apple and Its Suppliers: Corporate Social Responsibility
In a 2014 documentary, the multinational technology company Apple Inc. was implicated in alleged human rights violations at Pegatron, a large Chinese supplier that assembled Apple's iPhones. The allegations followed similar, well-publicized violations in 2009 at another China-based Apple supplier. Although Apple had promised to improve its practices, doing so had clearly proven to be a difficult task. How should Apple respond to these new allegations? Should it evade the accusations and instead point to its existing efforts? Could it do more to protect workers? Should it rethink its offshoring and outsourcing strategy? Is it fair to blame Apple for the activities of its suppliers? Where does the blame fall?