This case is written to help students explore how companies can maintain and develop trust while innovating, how to identify and respond effectively to warning signs that they may not be as trusted as they believe, and how being trusted can aid in expanding and growing a business. In June 2021, Mikhail Lomtadze, co-founder and CEO of Kaspi.kz (Kaspi), the number one player in digital payments, fintech, and online commerce in Kazakhstan, was weighing paths to future growth. In the fourteen years since he became CEO, Lomtadze had transformed the business from a commercial bank into a leading technology company. By 2014, Kaspi had built an impressive ecosystem of three planforms: fintech products, digital payment products, and an online marketplace. Yet that same year, a bank run fueled by misinformation made it clear to Lomtadze that Kaspi wasn't as trusted as he thought. In 2017, Kaspi unrolled a super-app, fulfilling a vision they'd had from the get-go of being a one-stop shop for all the products and services they offered. In 2020, Kaspi turned its attention to new customers, creating a suite of products to make merchants' lives easier, and collaborated with the government to begin digitalizing the most used public services. Kaspi's products enjoyed widespread adoption and were used by about 50 percent of Kazakhstan's population that year. As Lomtadze considered expanding outside of Kazakhstan, he wondered if Kaspi could successfully export its company culture and approach to building trust, and how Kaspi's image as a homegrown brand could be used as an asset to its expansion strategy. In addition to the main case, two short cases on management's response to the 2014 bank run, designed to be taught in class, provide a striking example of a successful response to a trust crisis and show how lessons learned can help companies become even more trusted by customers and employees.

Globally, over the past fifty years, more companies have used layoffs to cut costs during periods of decreased demand or economic downturns. But layoffs have far-reaching consequences, generate hidden costs, and harm the company in myriad ways. This note reviews ways to approach and manage workforce change in two ways: 1) It examines the hidden costs and consequences of layoffs on employees (those who leave and those who remain), the company's financial performance, the community, and industry. 2) It offers suggestions for managing workforce change, including strategies for conducting layoffs to mitigate the negative effects for all parties.

This case examines the mass layoffs that swept through the tech industry (2022-2023) through the lens of four companies: Twitter, Stripe, Meta, and Google. How these companies implemented workforce change through mass layoffs raises critical questions applicable beyond the tech industry. During economic downturns, most companies may consider layoffs to cut costs. The case compares how different companies conducted mass layoffs at scale and discussed the long-term consequences that layoffs have on the company's financial performance, innovation, quality of service, staff commitment, and ability to attract future talent.

LCA action plans integrate responsibility and accountability into decision-making and planning. This module note was designed for the LCA course and reviews six steps leaders can follow to develop a practical LCA action plan for their business. It shows how integrating an LCA perspective can help leaders make better strategic decisions when planning by helping them clarify analysis, sharpen criteria for success, and be better prepared to manage risk.

Dave Balter and Jim Myers co-founded Mylestone, a death tech startup that applied technology to transform how grieving people memorialize the dead. The startup addressed a cultural problem and promised to solve a pressing need in the antiquated, multi-billion dollar death industry. But despite a well-defined market and positive response to the idea, Mylestone made little headway in the funeral industry during its first eighteen months. In response to a series of obstacles, the company made a number of pivots. All startups pivot. But recent changes felt more fundamental. The company had moved away from its initial purpose, business model, and early team. Now, user demand suggested the startup should pivot again, away from death tech to produce custom photo books. The company had pivoted so much already that it barely resembled the venture they founded. Had they pivoted to an entirely new business? With each major change, the passion both founders felt when they started Mylestone waned. Did they want to continue leading the company in the new direction? Balter believed that the new direction would limit the startup's growth capacity and, to complicate matters further, Balter and Myers recently discovered a mutual interest in cryptocurrency. They started a side project in crypto trading that showed signs of taking off in a way Mylestone never would. If they harbored doubts about Mylestone, should they inform investors, close the company, and focus their energy on founding a venture based on their side project? What legal and ethical obligations did they have to Mylestone's investors and employees?

Wes Hall founded Kingsdale Advisors and built it into one of Canada's leading shareholder services and advisory firms. Influenced by the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement and a series of social injustices-specifically the death of George Floyd in police custody-Hall had an idea to use his privilege, power, and position to make a social impact. He decided to risk his financial security and potentially jeopardize his reputation to launch a new venture, BlackNorth Initiative (BNI), to combat systemic racism. After an initial burst of positive reactions to the BNI, Hall was left with the questions that confront every entrepreneur: What problem am I addressing? What solution should I pursue? Am I the right person to take on this challenge? Who do I need on my team? Hall wants BlackNorth Initiative to have lasting impact after the momentum of the BLM fades. Just two months after launching BNI, Hall faced a dilemma: a leading Canadian businessman and philanthropist offered to donate $1,000,000 to the BNI if they would establish a cultural center for Black Canadians. As Founder and Chairman of the BlackNorth Initiative, Hall had a decision: should he accept the funds and build the center? Could a cultural center help dismantle anti-Black systemic barriers from the bottom up and help legitimize BNI with community activist groups? Or would the costs of establishing and running a center ultimately dilute his focus and diffuse the power of his initial idea?

The case focuses on the initial startup team and Founders' agreements. In March 2018, Sanchali Pal proposed renegotiating the informal founders' agreement and equity split she and her co-founders had drafted the previous spring. They had been working together for over a year to solve one of the most complex and urgent problems of our time-global warming. Their company-a technology platform that enabled users to track and improve their carbon footprints on their smartphones in real time-had grown from their individual passion to combat the looming climate crisis. In the past year, their approach had been validated multiple times at different national clean energy competitions. But beneath external success, internal frictions threatened the team. Differing expectations and overlapping roles and responsibilities sparked frustrations between the co-founders and Pal began spending a considerable amount of time mediating their disagreements instead of focusing on the business. The case ends as the co-founders are meeting to discuss 3 core issues: 1) How to re-divide equity-what changes should they make to their original agreement? 2) How to establish clear roles, titles, and decision-making rights so that they could function effectively as a team. 3) How to allocate spending cash. Each grappled with key questions: Did they still trust one another? Did they feel respected? Could they renegotiate an agreement in a way that everyone could accept?