This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. There is no dearth of advice or resources on how to turn corporations into fountains of creative ideas. However, as veteran leaders of innovation campaigns know, the problem for most large organizations usually isn't a shortage of ideas -it's figuring out how to ferret out the good ones. As experienced executives know, delegating critical decisions comes with risks. The corporation may end up promoting ideas senior management does not deem worthy; alternatively, it may not pursue projects top management would have promoted had they known about them. Therefore, it's essential for senior managers to understand the mechanisms at work when their staff evaluates one another's ideas, so that executives can design an efficient idea selection process to hone in on the ideas that will make a real difference to the organization as they move through the innovation funnel. This article, based on research on more than 10,000 innovation proposals from within a large multinational corporation, examines what happens when ideas are screened through a large organization. Senior managers need to design systems, or funnels, where the ideas they are likely to favor are either (a) selected by subordinate managers for further evaluation at their level or (b) if the ideas are of sufficient importance or promise, flagged to the attention of top management for further evaluation. In a sense, the real challenge in selecting good ideas is optimizing the trade-off between the direct selection costs on the one hand and the costs of both missing out on good ideas and implementing the wrong ideas on the other. The author describes seven "setscrews"that senior managers can adjust to their particular context to ensure that the most promising innovation proposals -and only those -stand a good chance of being implemented.

R&D companies are increasingly falling prey to patent sharks: firms with hidden intellectual property that surface, threatening to sue, when their rights are inadvertently infringed. The attacks usually come out of the blue, and companies' traditional lines of defense, designed for fighting off visible competitors, are essentially useless in this type of guerrilla warfare. Munich University of Technology's Henkel and London Business School's Reitzig offer five principles to help companies avoid attack. Move away from amassing huge patent portfolios for cross-licensing with competitors. Creating technological interdependence can work among competitors interested in exchanging technology. Patent sharks, however, want only monetary gains. Simplify standards and create more-modular designs. Companies become vulnerable when a shark's technology is built into a standard and they can neither stop using the technology nor switch to a feasible alternative. The solution is to simplify standards to minimize the number of irreplaceable core components and to create more-modular designs, so an infringing module can be swapped out for a legitimate one. Cooperate with competitors early in the R&D process. Disclosing unprotected ideas to competitors can seem counterintuitive, but sharing information early on may help companies avoid developing products that are susceptible to attacks. Foster interdepartmental and intercompany cooperation. Assigning patent lawyers to projects from the start reduces the costs of protecting high-quality technologies down the line. Stop flooding patent offices with insignificant inventions. The deluge has actually made it easier for sharks to secure protection for trivial innovations, thus increasing the chances that a company will unknowingly infringe on a patent.

This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. How are companies approaching intellectual property (IP) strategy, and what are successful strategies for managing IP? To explore such questions, the author and his research team conducted a detailed survey of senior IP executives at 34 companies. The survey findings indicate that IP has become an area of focus for the executive committee and the board at many companies. What's more, the study found that top executives' involvement in IP strategy was correlated with better IP performance. Analysis of the survey data suggests another intriguing point: Some companies are now using an approach to IP strategy that the author calls "full-fledged IP protection." This "full-fledged IP protection" strategy includes seeking technical and nontechnical IP protection for even minor inventions, in an attempt to "pack" technology spaces with IP claims. This practice differs from a classic IP strategy of using IP to support core research and development. At least in some industries, this change in IP use may, the author suggests, be causing the nature of IP competition to shift from the world of "real" products to that of "potential" products. The study also found that, in the companies surveyed, IP-related tasks often entail cooperation among staff from different functional areas within a company, such as product designers and patent and trademark attorneys. Having clear-cut rules about IP at the functional level was associated with better IP performance in the companies surveyed, as was having corporate management devote time to listening to the company's most senior IP officers. On the other hand, failure to sell or license out IP when circumstances facilitated or necessitated such a trade was associated with significantly lower IP performance.

This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. By one informed estimate from the late 1990s, three-quarters of the Fortune 100's total market capitalization was represented by intangible assets, such as patents, copyrights, and trademarks. In this environment, cautions the author, intellectual property management cannot be left to technology managers or corporate legal staff alone--it must be a matter of concern for functional and business-unit leaders as well as a corporation's most senior officers. To realize the full value of their companies' intellectual property, top executives must seek answers to the following questions: How can the company use intellectual property rights to gain and sustain competitive advantage? How do intellectual property rights affect the industry's structure? What options do intellectual property rights offer vis-a-vis competitors? How can intellectual property rights grant incumbency advantage and establish barriers to entry? How can intellectual property rights help the company gain vertical power along the value chain? What organizational design accommodates an intellectual property strategy most effectively? The author explores each question, drawing on such company examples as Nokia, Motorola, Novo Nordisk, and Leo Pharma, in the process helping lead intellectual property rights out of their shadowy existence in patent and legal departments.