When low-income and disadvantaged individuals start businesses-herein, poverty entrepreneurs-the experience of fear can be especially impactful on their behavior. In this article, we explore the role of fear as an obstacle and facilitator in both the launching and development of ventures by poverty entrepreneurs. Two primary fears are examined. The first, fear of failure, has been examined extensively by scholars yet has received scant attention concerning poverty entrepreneurs. Our second focus is the fear of success, which has received even less emphasis and is not well-understood in the context of business. It is a seemingly paradoxical notion that individuals can perceive negative consequences from what is otherwise a successful outcome. Using experiences from the Urban Poverty and Business Initiative-an 11-month annual intervention program that operates in 32 cities across the globe and serves over 2,000 disadvantaged entrepreneurs-we developed a series of focus groups with poverty entrepreneurs to learn more about their encounters with fear. A reconceptualization of these fears in a poverty context is provided. The potential upsides and downsides of fear when it comes to entrepreneurial behavior are examined, and implications are drawn from the coexistence of fears of failure and success.

While entrepreneurship in developing economies at the base of the pyramid is receiving growing attention, scholars have devoted less effort to exploring entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty in advanced economies. Yet, poverty rates have not meaningfully changed in most developed economies in 50 years, and the income gap between rich and poor continues to widen. In this article, we examine entrepreneurship as a source of empowerment for the economically disadvantaged. We explore the nature of poverty and its implications for various aspects of entrepreneurship, identify problematic aspects of the typical low-income startup, and present the SPODER conceptual framework for fostering entrepreneurial development among the poor: (S) supportive infrastructure, (P) preparation of the entrepreneur; (O) expanded opportunity horizons; (D) finding sources of differentiation; (E) a well-designed economic model; and (R) leveraging community resources. We conclude by drawing from the framework implications for those involved in breaking the cycle of poverty.

Conventional pricing is being turned on its head. Deciding what prices to charge represents one of the more visible decision variables confronting managers. Prices send clear messages about customer value and company objectives. Yet, pricing has been one of the least emphasized strategic issues. Historically, managers have taken price for granted, thinking its main function was to cover costs and provide a target rate of return. Now, companies are adopting more sophisticated approaches. A strategic perspective on pricing includes price objectives, price strategy, price structure, price levels, and price promotions. E-commerce opens new opportunities for using differentiated pricing all the time, optimizing pricing by creating customer switching barriers, and differentiating by stage. Challenges to management include the development of technology that facilitates customer price searching and customers making rather than taking prices. An integrative framework for analysis combines the dimensions of strategic pricing with market-based versus cost-based, proactive versus reactive, risk-assumptive versus risk-aversive, and flexible versus standardized dimensions.