This case, a follow-up to "Matteo Hill at Drawn, Inc. (A)" (UVA-OB-1293), continues the debate about sharing the raw responses from employee pulse surveys. The decision becomes more complicated after the company releases a new round of raw survey results that contain three wildly different opinions about Drawn, Inc.'s, DEI efforts. The new results highlight the challenge of summarizing or editing the raw survey data, yet also make it clear that the raw survey data will continue to contain divisive and potentially offensive remarks. At the conclusion of the case, Drawn's leadership team remains divided about the best path forward.

In mid-2008, hedge fund manager Steve Maiden was riding high. The self-assured Maiden had launched his own fund in late 2006 and it was substantially outperforming the market. Investors wanted in, and Maiden's personal wealth exceeded even his own lofty expectations. But then things began to fall apart. The global financial crisis hit and several of Maiden's large investments were imploding. His efforts to capture some value hinged on reaching an agreement with several partners. To buy time until an agreement could be reached, Maiden began to falsify his fund's returns to investors. He continued to do this for over two years. In May 2013, Maiden pleaded guilty to securities fraud and was given a seven-year prison sentence, leaving behind his wife and two young children. The Steve Maiden case series (consisting of UVA-OB-1437, UVA-OB-1438, and UVA-OB-1439) provides an inside look at the rise, demise, and resurrection of an ambitious young man whose profile is not unlike that of many MBA students. It gives students a unique opportunity to witness events as they unfolded, and read Maiden's own words about his thoughts and feelings as things unraveled, as well as his candid reflections on what he learned from the experience.

In mid-2008, hedge fund manager Steve Maiden was riding high. The self-assured Maiden had launched his own fund in late 2006 and it was substantially outperforming the market. Investors wanted in, and Maiden's personal wealth exceeded even his own lofty expectations. But then things began to fall apart. The global financial crisis hit and several of Maiden's large investments were imploding. His efforts to capture some value hinged on reaching an agreement with several partners. To buy time until an agreement could be reached, Maiden began to falsify his fund's returns to investors. He continued to do this for over two years. In May 2013, Maiden pleaded guilty to securities fraud and was given a seven-year prison sentence, leaving behind his wife and two young children. The Steve Maiden case series (consisting of UVA-OB-1437, UVA-OB-1438, and UVA-OB-1439) provides an inside look at the rise, demise, and resurrection of an ambitious young man whose profile is not unlike that of many MBA students. It gives students a unique opportunity to witness events as they unfolded, and read Maiden's own words about his thoughts and feelings as things unraveled, as well as his candid reflections on what he learned from the experience.

In mid-2008, hedge fund manager Steve Maiden was riding high. The self-assured Maiden had launched his own fund in late 2006 and it was substantially outperforming the market. Investors wanted in, and Maiden's personal wealth exceeded even his own lofty expectations. But then things began to fall apart. The global financial crisis hit and several of Maiden's large investments were imploding. His efforts to capture some value hinged on reaching an agreement with several partners. To buy time until an agreement could be reached, Maiden began to falsify his fund's returns to investors. He continued to do this for over two years. In May 2013, Maiden pleaded guilty to securities fraud and was given a seven-year prison sentence, leaving behind his wife and two young children. The Steve Maiden case series (consisting of UVA-OB-1437, UVA-OB-1438, and UVA-OB-1439) provides an inside look at the rise, demise, and resurrection of an ambitious young man whose profile is not unlike that of many MBA students. It gives students a unique opportunity to witness events as they unfolded, and read Maiden's own words about his thoughts and feelings as things unraveled, as well as his candid reflections on what he learned from the experience.

This exercise helps students practice bringing vulnerability, compassion, and curiosity to a discussion. Over two rounds, groups of students are asked to both answer questions about themselves and listen as others answer, sharing in an environment of confidentiality and care.

How leaders behave in difficult situations are an important part of controlling their narrative. This public-sourced case provides students an opportunity to examine how one leader behaves while under scrutiny. The material presents a short history of Lieutenant Colonel Oliver ""Ollie"" North, a US national security adviser under US President Ronald Reagan. North testified before Congress, and an analysis of his testimonies provides an opportunity to view how he conducted himself under pressure. This case is meant to be paired with another case presenting the story of the former president of Stanford University, Donald Kennedy, who was accused of overbilling the government for indirect costs on research contracts: "Acting and Speaking with Power: Donald Kennedy and Stanford Accounting-Indirectly Accused?" (UV8149). Used together, the cases present an opportunity to compare two very different approaches to speaking and acting with power.

How leaders behave in difficult situations are an important part of controlling their narrative. This public-sourced case provides students an opportunity to examine how one leader behaves while under scrutiny. The material presents the history of the former president of Stanford University, Donald Kennedy, who was accused of overbilling the government for indirect costs on research contracts. He testified before Congress, and an analysis of his testimony provides an opportunity to view how he conducted himself under pressure. This case is meant to be paired with another case presenting the story of Lieutenant Colonel Oliver "Ollie" North, a US national security adviser under former US President Ronald Reagan: "Acting and Speaking with Power: Oliver North and the Iran-Contra Deal-the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" (UV8147). Used together, the cases present an opportunity to compare two very different approaches to acting and speaking with power.

Who doesn't want the ability to wield influence, and build or possess some sort of power? The A case describes the ascent of a blogger at the top of the list of the most influential luxury fashion writers worldwide. He had made his way to front-row seats at fashion events, created a signature pose, garnered the attention of those who mattered in the high-end fashion business, lived lavishly, and was deemed a de facto representative of the Philippines. Yet Bryanboy seemingly had no boundaries on pitching a message of individualistic narcissism and misbehavior alongside his designer goods. People responded to him in a variety of ways, ranging from hostility to apathy to engagement. How did Bryanboy achieve the power to define for the world what's stylish, beautiful, elegant, and inspiring? And why did so many people loathe him? The single paragraph B case, to hand out in class, shares that despite evidence that allegations made against Bryanboy in the A case were true, powerful people in the industry continued to admire and defend him.

Who doesn't want the ability to wield influence, and build or possess some sort of power? This case describes the ascent of a blogger at the top of the list of the most influential luxury fashion writers worldwide. He had made his way to front-row seats at fashion events, created a signature pose, garnered the attention of those who mattered in the high-end fashion business, lived lavishly, and was deemed a de facto representative of the Philippines. Yet Bryanboy seemingly had no boundaries on pitching a message of individualistic narcissism and misbehavior alongside his designer goods. People responded to him in a variety of ways, ranging from hostility to apathy to engagement. How did Bryanboy achieve the power to define for the world what's stylish, beautiful, elegant, and inspiring? And why did so many people loathe him?