Organizational transactions are handled along a continuum of the firm's customer relationships, ranging from relational and friendly to more adversarial and us-versus-them in demeanor. For top customers, the approach is almost always close and relational. In this article, we question this view and suggest that there is benefit from conditioning the firm's relationship development efforts on an understanding of the true value to be gained from partnering and increased closeness. We provide a framework with which managers can diagnose their current portfolio of relationships with key customers or suppliers and offer suggestions for action. We provide an empirical illustration of the typical distribution of responses among five regions of the framework and discuss its implications.

The number and value of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) continue to grow, with record increases in the U.S. and Asia Pacific in 2015. Yet, despite calls from academic literature for more consideration of the human and behavioral factors in such massive change, there remains an inordinate focus on the financial or quantitative aspects. We connect the newer streams of research with efficiency and growth imperatives via an illustrative analysis of ANZ New Zealand's horizontal merger with The National Bank of New Zealand. ANZ successfully completed a brand and technology merger by prioritizing the customer, addressing employees' socioeconomic concerns, providing enough time and resources to ensure efficiencies, and rebranding enriched customer services and revenues. The results were overwhelmingly positive and provide a useful template for how M&As should be executed in the future using a people-first approach.

This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. Forming close relationships with suppliers or customers is a popular business strategy, but such partnerships can be problematic. Many close business relationships--whether joint ventures or loose alliances--fail. Describes a phenomenon called the "dark side" of close relationships and maintains that close relationships that seem quite stable can, in fact, be vulnerable to decline and destruction. Draws on surveys of business relationships and other examples. The same factors that strengthen a partnership can also open the door to relationship problems. For example, when an automaker and a supplier built up personal relationships between employees at the two firms to facilitate their alliance and just-in-time manufacturing process, the trust and personal relationships also enabled the supplier more easily to cut corners in the production process. Discusses strategies to prevent the dark side from taking over a business relationship--for example, to ensure that both parties in the relationship make investments in it, in effect swapping "mutual hostages." In cases where damage to the relationship already exists, possible strategies include rotating in new personnel, reconfiguring the relationship, or terminating it.

Why is it that two firms can use the Internet in the same way (e.g., to reach new customers) and achieve very different outcomes? How can firms better allocate and subsequently leverage the investments they make in Internet technologies? This article shows that e-commerce technologies cannot be successfully leveraged without considering the organizational relationships in which the technologies are being embedded. By properly matching the B2B context with Internet technologies, firms can be in a better position not only to achieve significant economic outcomes, but also to attain sustainable competitive advantages, improve coordination and collaboration processes, and decrease channel resistance.

Reverse auctions certainly look like a good deal for buyers. Who wouldn't want hoards of suppliers bidding one another's prices down? But a new study reveals important downsides that should make buyers beware.