• Stellar Development Foundation

    Blockchain pioneer Stellar Development Foundation oversees one of the earliest and largest crypto networks (Stellar) and the management of its native token XLM. The foundation partnered with cross-border payments provider MoneyGram to help on and off-ramp cryptocurrencies between the Stellar Network and cash. In one case, the partnership enabled the United Nations to distribute funds to refugees.
    詳細資料
  • Farcaster

    詳細資料
  • The Israeli Innovation Authority: Decision-making in a Time of Uncertainty

    詳細資料
  • TimeCredit

    TimeCredit is an artificial intelligence (AI) startup that is developing large language models (LLMs) to generate accounting memos. The case follows Ndonga Sagnia, a Gambian Harvard Business School MBA student with an accounting background, as she decides how much money to raise for her early-stage venture. The case also covers the challenges of finding a technical cofounder, initial equity allocation decisions, and the implications of the market context and founder identity for fundraising choices.
    詳細資料
  • Chime Solutions

    Just two years after launching its 10k by 2020 initiative to hire 10,000 employees by 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic forced Chief Executive Officer Mark Wilson to send nearly all of his staff at Chime Solutions (Chime) to work from home. Chime was a customer contact firm that offered call center services to corporate clients. Chime had an employee-focused model where it hired call center agents from underserved communities. It then offered skill building and life services to these agents, which led to industry-leading employee retention rates and an overall more committed and expert staff. After agents were deployed to work from home, however, it struggled to maintain its current operating model, causing increased attrition rates. It also had amassed a large amount of debt from maintaining its facilities in Morrow, Georgia; Dallas, Texas; and Charlotte, North Carolina. At the same time, the company was growing at a record pace, but needed to address its talent and debt challenges before realizing its dream of uncovering hidden talent in underserved communities.
    詳細資料
  • Ribbit Capital and the Gauntlet Investment Opportunity

    Ten-year-old, Palo Alto-based Ribbit Capital is best-known for its global investments in fintech. The firm was also an early advocate of crypto and blockchain, having invested in more than two dozen startups in the space in the past decade. In the Spring of 2022, Partner Nick Shalek contemplates an investment into Gauntlet, a Brooklyn-based crypto startup. He weighs not only the pros and cons of the Gauntlet investment in the context of the fund's overall portfolio, but also the deal structure. While investing in crypto startups played to many of the strengths that the Ribbit Capital team had built investing in fintech startups, there were a variety of aspects of crypto startup investing that were new and different. Sourcing deals, performing diligence, providing guidance to entrepreneurs, understanding governance, and negotiating deal terms were similar in principle, but presented new opportunities and challenges to navigate.
    詳細資料
  • LooksRare: The Decentralized, Tokenized, NFT Marketplace

    LooksRare launched a decentralized and anonymous organization to compete against NFT marketplace leader OpenSea. By launching its own cryptocurrency, LooksRare attempted to lure users with a digital rewards program. The nature of the organization and its business model, however, brought challenges that are unique to the blockchain industry.
    詳細資料
  • Luminar and the Rise of SPACs

    詳細資料
  • GeBBS Healthcare Solutions: Did You Ever Have to Make Up Your Mind?

    詳細資料
  • GeBBS Healthcare Solutions: Did You Ever Have to Make Up Your Mind? (B)

    詳細資料
  • NewView Capital and Venture Capital Secondaries

    While still a general partner at Silicon Valley-based New Enterprise Associates (NEA), Ravi Viswanathan considered the challenges presented by evolving market dynamics in the venture capital space. Startups were staying private longer, which led to limited partners thirsty for liquidity and venture capital funds managing overloaded portfolios. Viswanathan and the senior leaders of NEA orchestrated the purchase of 31 NEA unrealized portfolio companies by the newly created $1.35 billion NewView Capital spinout that he would head. This secondary transaction provided liquidity to NEA's limited partners and reallocated NEA partners' time to shepherd other portfolio companies, while at the same time allowing NewView Capital to reap gains from future exits from a portfolio of diverse, high-quality growth stage technology companies. Now, as he prepares to raise Fund II, Viswanathan acknowledges that the unique circumstances that enabled the launch of Fund I would not be replicable, and he must consider alternative strategies to pursue next. Should he continue to focus on secondary transactions, focus on direct investments, or some combination of the two?
    詳細資料
  • Hony Capital and Jushi Group

    Hony Capital, a multi-billion dollar private equity firm based in China, is investing in a subsidiary of Jushi Group, a Chinese company that is one of the world's largest fiberglass producers. The specific project will build a plant in the United States. In this case, students consider the value Hony can provide to Jushi, and must also determine how Hony will eventually exit the transaction, given the complexity around its structure.
    詳細資料
  • BloomThat: Navigating the Ups and Downs of a Silicon Valley Start-up

    David Bladow and Matthew Schwab, close friends and former college roommates, left their jobs and moved to San Francisco to start a new venture together. After exploring the gifting industry, they ultimately focused on floral delivery. They launched BloomThat, an on-demand service that made sending flowers as easy as sending a text message and gained initial traction over Valentine's Day in 2013. On the back of this success, the team was accepted into Y Combinator for the summer of 2013, raised $3.6 million of seed funding over the next year, and in December 2014, secured $4 million of Series A financing. Problems arose soon after BloomThat expanded to Los Angeles in early 2015, and by the summer, the company teetered on the brink of collapse. Aggressive restructuring saved BloomThat, and existing investors provided bridge financing in late 2015. In the end, however, the turnaround was not enough to attract new investors. When the case picks up in May 2017, Bladow and Schwab must decide what to do next. One option is to shut down BloomThat and move on. The other is to search to sell the start-up to one of the large companies in the industry, with the cofounders knowing that the process will take multiple months, would yield a low valuation and require them to go work for the incumbent for a meaningful period of time. Given their position in the capitalization table, the co-founders are unclear how the value from such a transaction will be divided with the venture capital and venture debt investors. With this uncertainty, the co-founders need to decide how to proceed.
    詳細資料
  • PROOF: Pro Rata Opportunity Fund

    詳細資料
  • CleanWater, Inc.: Running Dry & Out of Time

    詳細資料
  • Illuminate Ventures: Raising a Venture Fund

    It was the spring of 2010 and Cindy Padnos had just been named to Fast Company's list of "The Most Influential Women in Technology in 2010." Cindy had worked in the venture capital (VC) space for over a decade, launching her own firm, Illuminate Ventures, in 2009 with a focus on early-stage companies in the enterprise cloud computing space. Cindy's portfolio of personal investments was performing well, and if she could perform as well for Illuminate, the future would be bright. Regardless, before she got to make any investments on behalf of Illuminate Ventures I, she would need to raise capital for her fund in one of the most challenging economic times in recent history. While acknowledgements by media outlets like Fast Company never hurt, such accolades were not enough to secure the $35 million that was her target. As she looked back over her professional experiences in the corporate world and ahead to the hundreds of investor meetings that lay before her, Cindy reflected that this was perhaps one of the most difficult, but most rewarding, challenges she had ever undertaken.
    詳細資料