In July 2017, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) launched the world's first Humanitarian Impact Bond. This innovative finance pilot was an experiment by the ICRC to engage the private sector differently and diversify funding - critical given the widening humanitarian aid gap. It was a massive undertaking. The HIB, which had a maximum potential deal size of CHF 26 million, took over four years to plan and multiple stakeholders, including governments, foundations, investors and lawyers, to put together. How did the ICRC pull this off and what possibilities does innovative finance offer the humanitarian and private sectors? Drawing on a series of proprietary interviews with key characters, various internal documents shared by the ICRC, and secondary sources such as news reports, press releases and reports by third-party organizations, this abridged case delves into the ICRC's motivations for entering innovative finance, why it chose the HIB instrument, what it was, the hurdles and challenges of designing and setting up this complex instrument, and what the ICRC did to get the project off the ground. Participants interested in innovative finance, the humanitarian and/or development sectors, cross-sectoral/industry collaboration, and social innovation will find the case particularly interesting.

Coal plays a critical role as an energy pillar in many parts of the world. In three of the world's most populous countries - China, India and Indonesia - coal supplies more than 60% of electricity needs. However, coal is also one of the most polluting and greenhouse gas emission-intensive substances, holding the dubious title of the single largest contributor to global warming. Mining is one of the industries under scrutiny for its role in the coal supply chain. Amid growing negative public sentiment and investor pressure, the mining majors are pursuing different strategies regarding coal. Rio Tinto completely exited in 2018. Anglo American spun out its coal assets into a separate company, effectively putting the decision in shareholders' hands. Meanwhile, Glencore held on to coal, declaring "managed decline" the most responsible approach. The case's dilemma - "who has it right" - offers fertile ground for debate. Participants should analyze the pros and cons of the company's strategies from different angles and explore the repercussions on various stakeholders, on shareholders and on the environment. The potential learnings from this case and previews of the difficult trade-offs leaders face extend beyond mining to many industries in transition.

Angaza's story is not a typical solar light story, but the story of a female social entrepreneur with a for-profit Silicon Valley mindset transforming a social enterprise from a hardware to a software business model. It is about pivots, changing value propositions, and new products and business models as Angaza evolves to escalate social impact while still making money. Angaza began as a solar-light company founded in 2010 by Stanford graduate Lesley Silverthorn Marincola to address energy poverty in rural off-grid communities. In her quest to address affordability, Lesley realized that the main problem confronting rural off-grid communities was not the price of solar lights per se, but finding a way to spread payments over time. In 2012, Angaza pivoted from being a solar-light producer to a software provider offering pay-as-you-go (PAYG) metering and monitoring technology to players in the solar-light ecosystem - manufacturers, distributors and mobile network operators. The PAYG technology allowed end consumers to buy solar-light products by paying small amounts over time, until they eventually owned them outright. At the end of the case, students are confronted with a very real dilemma facing the founder and leadership team of many start-ups, including Angaza - what are the next opportunities for the company? Is it further scaling (if so, scaling up or deep), a pivot (into data), or an exit (sell the business)?

The case features Sara Razmpa, head of responsible investment, and Fiona Frick, CEO of Unigestion, at a critical juncture in the Geneva-based asset management firm's ESG journey: the decision to launch an equities fund that specifically tackles climate change. While Unigestion had launched product families that integrated ESG in the past, this would be a new and more challenging undertaking. The case opens with the two debating between whether to launch a Climate Transition Fund or the more ambitious Paris-aligned Fund. Both methods aligned with the Paris Agreement by placing the portfolio on a 1.5ºC trajectory, with no or limited overshoot, and heading towards net-zero by 2050. However, they differed in their starting points and stringency. Students are placed in the shoes of Razmpa and Frick and need to decide which portfolio to launch - while balancing climate impact, commercial considerations and fund performance. The selection of climate funds is not straightforward. The decision touches on key debate points in sustainable finance: a financial investor's fiduciary duty, whether to exclude or engage with high emitters and what would be most effective in tackling climate change. Finally, the case includes a practical application exercise where students can construct their own climate-focused portfolio. This is a timely case. There is a growing spotlight on climate change, especially with COP 26 in late 2021. Despite country pledges for net-zero emissions, a UN study found that current fossil fuel production plans set forth by governments worldwide for 2030 is double the level required to limit global warming to 1.5ºC. The financial sector, as a key allocator of capital, has a key role to play. This case can help students better understand the role financial institutions can play in the transformation towards a 1.5ºC world, the nuances of building climate positive portfolios and how to critically analyze different climate strategies and their implications.

The case features Sara Razmpa, head of responsible investment, and Fiona Frick, CEO of Unigestion, at a critical juncture in the Geneva-based asset management firm's ESG journey: the decision to launch an equities fund that specifically tackles climate change. While Unigestion had launched product families that integrated ESG in the past, this would be a new and more challenging undertaking. The case opens with the two debating between whether to launch a Climate Transition Fund or the more ambitious Paris-aligned Fund. Both methods aligned with the Paris Agreement by placing the portfolio on a 1.5ºC trajectory, with no or limited overshoot, and heading towards net-zero by 2050. However, they differed in their starting points and stringency. Students are placed in the shoes of Razmpa and Frick and need to decide which portfolio to launch - while balancing climate impact, commercial considerations and fund performance. The selection of climate funds is not straightforward. The decision touches on key debate points in sustainable finance: a financial investor's fiduciary duty, whether to exclude or engage with high emitters and what would be most effective in tackling climate change. Finally, the case includes a practical application exercise where students can construct their own climate-focused portfolio. This is a timely case. There is a growing spotlight on climate change, especially with COP 26 in late 2021. Despite country pledges for net-zero emissions, a UN study found that current fossil fuel production plans set forth by governments worldwide for 2030 is double the level required to limit global warming to 1.5ºC. The financial sector, as a key allocator of capital, has a key role to play. This case can help students better understand the role financial institutions can play in the transformation towards a 1.5ºC world, the nuances of building climate positive portfolios and how to critically analyze different climate strategies and their implications.

The case features Sara Razmpa, head of responsible investment, and Fiona Frick, CEO of Unigestion, at a critical juncture in the Geneva-based asset management firm's ESG journey: the decision to launch an equities fund that specifically tackles climate change. While Unigestion had launched product families that integrated ESG in the past, this would be a new and more challenging undertaking. The case opens with the two debating between whether to launch a Climate Transition Fund or the more ambitious Paris-aligned Fund. Both methods aligned with the Paris Agreement by placing the portfolio on a 1.5ºC trajectory, with no or limited overshoot, and heading towards net-zero by 2050. However, they differed in their starting points and stringency. Students are placed in the shoes of Razmpa and Frick and need to decide which portfolio to launch - while balancing climate impact, commercial considerations and fund performance. The selection of climate funds is not straightforward. The decision touches on key debate points in sustainable finance: a financial investor's fiduciary duty, whether to exclude or engage with high emitters and what would be most effective in tackling climate change. Finally, the case includes a practical application exercise where students can construct their own climate-focused portfolio. This is a timely case. There is a growing spotlight on climate change, especially with COP 26 in late 2021. Despite country pledges for net-zero emissions, a UN study found that current fossil fuel production plans set forth by governments worldwide for 2030 is double the level required to limit global warming to 1.5ºC. The financial sector, as a key allocator of capital, has a key role to play. This case can help students better understand the role financial institutions can play in the transformation towards a 1.5ºC world, the nuances of building climate positive portfolios and how to critically analyze different climate strategies and their implications.

Angaza's story is not a typical solar light story, but the story of a female social entrepreneur with a for-profit Silicon Valley mindset, transforming a social enterprise from a hardware to a software business model. It is about pivots, changing value propositions, new products and business models as Angaza evolves to escalate social impact while still making money. Angaza began as a solar-light company founded in 2010 by Stanford graduate Lesley Silverthorn Marincola to address energy poverty in rural off-grid communities. In her quest to address affordability, Lesley realized that the main problem confronting rural off-grid communities was not the price of solar lights per se, but finding a way to spread payments over time. In 2012, Angaza pivoted from being a solar-light producer to a software provider offering pay-as-you-go (PAYG) metering and monitoring technology to players in the solar-light ecosystem - manufacturers, distributors and mobile network operators. The PAYG technology allowed end consumers to buy solar-light products by paying small amounts over time, eventually owning them outright. At the end of the case, students are confronted with a very real dilemma facing the founder and leadership team of many start-ups, including Angaza - what are the next opportunities for the company? Is it further scaling (if so, scaling up or deep), a pivot (into data), or an exit (sell the business)?

In January 2019, Florian vom Bruch was brought in as the first external CEO to lead the privately-held luxury watch winder and safe company, BUBEN&ZORWEG. The founders, Harald Buben and Christian Zörweg, driven by a passion for adventure, a keen ear for market needs and a canny eye for seeing and seizing opportunities, had successfully brought the company so far. However, they wanted BUBEN&ZORWEG to go to the next level of growth and had brought in Florian to help them double turnover by 2025. Florian's first mandate: to create and execute a growth strategy for the company. What was at the heart of the firm's distinctive advantage? In which segments and markets should BUBEN&ZORWEG expand?

Late 2015. E-commerce was changing the face of retailing, and ALDO, a Canadian shoe retailer with a global presence, was not immune. The effects of e-commerce were felt not just in the sales channels, but in the whole customer experience and the customer journey. To successfully execute a compelling online and overseas strategy, there were a few things that ALDO needed to consider: 1) How could it build its online presence overseas given its historical expansion via a franchise model? 2) Given the rise of e-commerce, should ALDO reconsider its internationalization business model? 3) What does a truly omnichannel business look like for ALDO, and what does the company need to do to make it succeed?

Chinese conglomerate Wanda Group, headquartered in Beijing, is the country's largest commercial property developer and the world's largest movie theatre operator. One of its core businesses is the Wanda Plazas - large complexes encompassing shopping malls, cinemas, hotels and offices. Wanda's competitive advantages include a strong culture of execution and a proprietary technology backbone that supports and automates decision making processes. With the growth of ecommerce giants such as Alibaba and JD.com, traditional retail was coming under threat. Wanda, with its background in offline retail, saw the online-to-offline space as an opportunity. But, how best to execute? This case study follows Qu Dejun, president of Wanda's newly formed Internet Technology Group, as he and his team explored ways to leverage Wanda's traditional strengths to bring an online-to-offline strategy to fruition.

In 2013, GE implemented the FastWorks program, an initiative that utilized tools and methods adapted from start-up methodologies to make the company more customer centric, lean and agile. With the spread of FastWorks within GE, a startling conclusion became evident - the existing performance management system might no longer be fit for the company's new direction. This case series follows the journey of GE's new performance management system, Performance Development, and its PD@GE app. By utilizing FastWorks in its development process, the HR team was able to leverage customer feedback and rapid prototyping to build a new system with unique features, such as instantaneous feedback, upward feedback and removal of employee ratings.

In 2013, GE implemented the FastWorks program, an initiative that utilized tools and methods adapted from start-up methodologies to make the company more customer centric, lean and agile. With the spread of FastWorks within GE, a startling conclusion became evident - the existing performance management system might no longer be fit for the company's new direction. This case series follows the journey of GE's new performance management system, Performance Development, and its PD@GE app. By utilizing FastWorks in its development process, the HR team was able to leverage customer feedback and rapid prototyping to build a new system with unique features, such as instantaneous feedback, upward feedback and removal of employee ratings.

In 2013, GE implemented the FastWorks program, an initiative that utilized tools and methods adapted from start-up methodologies to make the company more customer centric, lean and agile. With the spread of FastWorks within GE, a startling conclusion became evident - the existing performance management system might no longer be fit for the company's new direction. This case series follows the journey of GE's new performance management system, Performance Development, and its PD@GE app. By utilizing FastWorks in its development process, the HR team was able to leverage customer feedback and rapid prototyping to build a new system with unique features, such as instantaneous feedback, upward feedback and removal of employee ratings.