The A case, Financial Strategy at BAA PLC, discusses the structure of the target company and specifically its capital structure. BAA's asset base was very stable, low risk and very well protected from competition. The firm had been generating substantial cash flows over the past few years and had completed some acquisitions at home and abroad. Yet, it was underleveraged, not only according to the simple capital structure theory but also compared to its peers. Therefore, Grupo Ferrovial (and Goldman Sachs, which was competing to acquire BAA) found a great value opportunity by leveraging up BAA's assets. The B case, Ferrovial Conquers the UK, guides us through the acquisition process and in particular through the financing aspects of the deal. The BAA-Ferrovial Acquisition received the Finance Package of the Year Award by Acquisitions Monthly Magazine. The deal was the largest infrastructure acquisition financing ever undertaken in the debt markets; it contained the largest second lien tranche ever, which maximized liquidity, tapping interest among both banks and fund investors; and had a groundbreaking structure designed potentially to survive a whole-business securitization. Learning objectives: The case can be used with a broad range of audiences and provides opportunities to discuss the basics of capital structure and financial policy; to describe the functioning of debt markets; to follow a complex acquisition that went from hostile to friendly; to discuss syndication in the credit markets; and to analyze the challenges that CFOs face in order to balance the threat of acquisitions with the need for a conservative capital structure. It can be used in a basic finance course to introduce capital structure and debt financing. It can also be used with finance teams and with executives in general as a way to discuss the complex terms of the transaction.

The A case, Financial Strategy at BAA PLC, discusses the structure of the target company and specifically its capital structure. BAA's asset base was very stable, low risk and very well protected from competition. The firm had been generating substantial cash flows over the past few years and had completed some acquisitions at home and abroad. Yet, it was underleveraged, not only according to the simple capital structure theory but also compared to its peers. Therefore, Grupo Ferrovial (and Goldman Sachs, which was competing to acquire BAA) found a great value opportunity by leveraging up BAA's assets. The B case, Ferrovial Conquers the UK, guides us through the acquisition process and in particular through the financing aspects of the deal. The BAA-Ferrovial Acquisition received the Finance Package of the Year Award by Acquisitions Monthly Magazine. The deal was the largest infrastructure acquisition financing ever undertaken in the debt markets; it contained the largest second lien tranche ever, which maximized liquidity, tapping interest among both banks and fund investors; and had a groundbreaking structure designed potentially to survive a whole-business securitization. Learning objectives: The case can be used with a broad range of audiences and provides opportunities to discuss the basics of capital structure and financial policy; to describe the functioning of debt markets; to follow a complex acquisition that went from hostile to friendly; to discuss syndication in the credit markets; and to analyze the challenges that CFOs face in order to balance the threat of acquisitions with the need for a conservative capital structure. It can be used in a basic finance course to introduce capital structure and debt financing. It can also be used with finance teams and with executives in general as a way to discuss the complex terms of the transaction.

The situation was clearly untenable. In March 2008, ESB's chief executive Padraig McManus made the startling announcement that the company would become a net-zero carbon emitter by 2035, and would still remain competitive. Under his leadership, ESB was going to lead the way in slowing the growth of Ireland's GHG emissions. He declared that to achieve this goal, ESB would invest €22 billion over 15 years to develop alternative clean technologies, including energy efficiency measures, the use of clean coal, and the connection of an electricity-generating wind farm to the national grid. His target would make ESB the world's first carbon-neutral electric utility. This strategy presented a number of significant risks: 1) Financial risk - the €22 billion capital investment had to succeed. 2) Technological and ecological risks - the strategic framework relied on clean coal technology, still being developed. 3) Credibility risk - what if ESB was not able to achieve its goal? 4) Stakeholder risk - Landowners, concerned over health, environment and property prices, were ready to oppose the wind farms. McManus was conscious of the risks, and he also knew that high performing leaders always take risks even while confronting dilemmas such as: Could an electric utility achieve a zero carbon footprint and remain competitive? Can a responsible leader risk jeopardizing the present and future well-being of his company, the environment, and his country? Could he exert his leadership by influencing Irish, and possibly European, climate policy? The case provides an opportunity for a debate on responsible leadership. It was written for use in senior executive and MBA programs.

The RHP was particularly attractive to treat the poor. At a treatment cost of just US$ 25 a year, the RHP was expected to make a major dent in lowering CVD-related deaths and disabilities in India. Dr. Reddy's had completed clinical trials to launch the pill in India and international clinical trials were under way to launch the pill in other markets. The company also hoped to introduce a variant of the pill for primary prevention, helping patients with a low to moderate risk of CVD avert a first heart attack or stroke. The case details the many dilemmas that the top management team of Dr. Reddy's faced in pursuing the RHP project. The active ingredients in the RHP were generic drugs; and yet, because the combination had never been offered before, the RHP had to go through clinical trials to prove its bioequivalence to each of the constituent drugs. The RHP also had to be marketed to physicians and could be sold only through a prescription. The added R&D and marketing costs had to be recouped through the price of the RHP, although this price had to be closer to generics prices. In addition, it would be hard to get a patent for the RHP. Here was a pill that was neither a new discovery drug nor a straight generic. Shaping a strategy for it was demanding and yet if the RHP could be launched successfully, there would be several other opportunities for a combination pill to treat other chronic diseases like depression and osteoarthritis. Learning objectives: The case is a good vehicle to discuss the changing landscape of the global pharmaceutical industry which is faced with the simultaneous challenge of a thinning new product pipeline and increasing pressures from government regulators and third party payers to cut costs. Projects like the RHP at Dr. Reddy's provide examples of the new business models (and the dilemmas that underlie them) that industry leaders would have to consider.

The Tata Nano was launched by Tata Motors, a member of the Tata Group in January 2008. This "one lakh car" ($2,500) was hailed as the people's car. Ratan Tata, chairman of the Tata Group, which was widely respected for its socially responsible business practices, had personally championed the Nano's development in the belief that it would revolutionize the mobility of the middle class in India. The first models were due to roll out of the company's green field factory in Singur, West Bengal in October 2008. While Tata Motors had been offered financial incentives to locate to West Bengal, the company also wished to play an active role in the re-industrialization of the state and contribute to the economic development of the region. But protests severely disrupted work at the Nano plant and it finally ground to a halt on 2 September 2008. In October 2008 the company announced that it was relocating its Nano factory to the western Indian state of Gujarat, walking away from its $328 million investment. Learning objectives: The pursuit of Sustainable Development (SD) is not as straight forward as its proponents advocate. A firm's financial, social and environmental performance may be at odds with each other. The challenge for top management is to deal with the underlying dilemmas. Nano offered the middle class Indian a safer alternative to carrying his family of four on a two wheeler. The company located its Greenfield factory in West Bengal, again to help develop backward regions of that Indian state. Yet, there were challenges to the Nano project from environmentalists and politicians concerned about the impact of the project on subsistence farmers.

Tata Motors is one of the crown jewels of the Tata Group, India's premier industrial house. In Fiscal Year 2008 the company sold 585,649 vehicles and had a turnover of INR 335 billion (Indian rupees) (US$8.4 billion), making it the largest automobile company in India. Tata Motors had ambitious plans to double the number of vehicles that it sold in a mere five years by maintaining its lead in the booming Indian market and by establishing a greater global presence. The case describes Tata Motors' journey to becoming a global contender. It traces the company's business portfolio and strategy, its dramatic turnaround in 2000-2002, its strengthened position in India in both commercial vehicles and passenger cars, as well as its diversification into international markets through greenfield ventures, as well as acquisitions and alliances - notably the Jaguar LandRover purchase in 2008. In January 2008, Tata Motors unveiled the Tata Nano, priced at INR 100,000 or one lakh ($2,500), the cheapest car in the world. By entering two of the fastest growing areas of the automotive industry (the premium and small car segments), Tata Motors company was firmly on the path to becoming a global contender. Learning objectives: The case has the following objectives: 1) Introduce students to Tata Motors - an emerging global player in the auto industry from India; 2) Understand and critique the company's domestic strategy to date (including the launch of the Nano); 3) Review its international strategy to date (including its acquisition of Jaguar and LandRover; 4) Discuss how the company's Managing Director should address the challenges facing the company.