To understand how companies might successfully assess, pilot, and implement cutting-edge technologies, the authors studied how IKEA introduced drone technology into its warehouse operations. The company's experience demonstrates that a use case for a technology that has not yet been widely adopted can be developed into a meaningful business case when an organization takes a coordinated approach to conducting pilots and finds the right vendor partners.

This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. Most research on open innovation has focused on the use of ideas and knowledge from outside the organization in the development of products and services. But openness can be useful for process innovation, too. The authors' research shows that manufacturers can benefit substantially when they look for ideas beyond the factory gates, especially when their operations are already advanced. In this article, the authors analyzed nine years of survey responses from 1,000 Swiss manufacturers, as well as 200 interviews with personnel at the Volvo Group (AB Volvo), a manufacturer of trucks, buses, construction equipment, and marine and industrial engines that is based in Gothenburg, Sweden. Although the authors concede that some companies have good reasons for keeping process innovations concealed, they found that for many manufacturers, such defensiveness deprives companies of a valuable source of ideas for productivity improvement. The authors present six ideas to help manufacturing companies open up their innovation process. The first idea is to encourage factories within a large company to share innovative practices and success stories with one another. Companies that already do this informally, the authors say, can extend their activities with a systematic effort inside their factory networks and lay the groundwork for other open information sharing about processes. The second idea is to focus on the pace of process improvement. The third idea is to recognize that increased use of data access systems leads to greater production cost reductions. Customer relationship management, supply chain management, and enterprise resource planning software systems all require codification of tacit knowledge, which enhances a company's capacity to spread external process ideas and technology to the people who need it. As a fourth step, the authors recommend improving the organization's ability to absorb and implement ideas from

Corporate "lean" programs, often modeled after the Toyota Production System, can be powerful instruments for improving the performance of manufacturing plants. They help to emphasize parts of the production process that add the most value and eliminate those that don't. However, misplaced expectations can make implementation difficult and reduce the benefits. The authors argue that if managers better understood the expected rates of improvement, then implementations would go more smoothly. The authors studied the implementation of the Volvo Group's production system. Volvo Group, a leading maker of trucks and other heavy vehicles. The company introduced the Volvo Production System in 2007, and since then has been implementing it in its factories around the world. The authors visited 44 of Volvo's 67 plants and interviewed 200 managers. They found that there were four distinct stages of change in the rate of performance improvement and that there was a strong relationship between a plant's maturity in a production system implementation and its performance; progress roughly followed the shape of an S-curve: a plant's rate of improvement changes in the shape of a bell curve as the plant becomes more mature in implementing the production system. Performance improves slowly at first, and then at an increasing rate before the improvement rate gradually decreases. To measure the performance of the plants, the authors focused on nonfinancial metrics related to the quality, cost, delivery and safety of the plant's output. They then used statistical methods to find patterns. Volvo's assessment process provides a structure to help local managers compare their plants. It also provides a mechanism for transferring expertise and best practices. The assessments have a strong symbolic impact: They communicate the company's commitment to the production system. Implementing a production system is a long journey, but the authors conclude that it's a worthwhile endeavor.