This case follows Amira Rashad as she founds BulkWhiz, a Dubai-based buy-in-bulk grocery delivery platform. Following its launch in September 2017, BulkWhiz experiences rapid growth of 30 percent per month in the United Arab Emirates. Despite this initial success, Rashad finds herself at a critical juncture just nine months later, with a number of internal and external negotiations awaiting her. First, she is eager to convince her Chief Technology Officer to come on-board full-time, and needs to finalize details on his transition and compensation. Second, she is wrestling with how to expand her business beyond the UAE market. Finally, she is seeking series A fundraising, to fuel the company's growth. How should she approach and sequence these negotiations, and what obstacles might loom?

invisaWear is a start-up that used Internet of Things (IoT) technology to create a fashionable, single-purpose wearable for young females to provide them with peace of mind when faced with a dangerous situation. The smart product consisted of a charm attached to either a bracelet, necklace, or key chain which, when pressed, sent an SOS to the user's family, friends, and optionally, the police. The case study illustrates the entrepreneurial steps of identifying an opportunity, assembling a team, gathering resources, and then thinking big but starting small. In describing the invisaWear line of smart jewelry, the case provides a primer on IoT and it highlights the steps required to build smart, connected products.

This case provides an opportunity to evaluate different strategic factors that influence decision-makers when creating a country brand that is able to withstand today's competitive global context. It also explores the challenges of public-private partnership. Building a brand is not easy and to attempt one in the context of a country is quite challenging. It becomes even more difficult when dealing with developing countries, short- and long-term socio-economic crises, and constant pressure from a neighbor like the United States that has considerable influence on a country's image.

This case describes how Richard Lou, KEMET's Director of China Operations, was offered an opportunity from the U.S. headquarters to integrate the Batam Plant in Indonesia after he had led his Chinese team to successfully integrate the Shanghai Plant and the Nantong Plant. The opportunity gave Richard mixed feelings, for he was aware that the task of integrating the Indonesian plant, which had a very complicated background and had been suffering losses for many years, would be fraught-a make-or-break moment of his career. Should he rest on his laurels or rise to the challenge? Richard had to make a critical decision.

This case relates how Richard finally decided to accept the great challenge, and thus formed an integration team of experts in different functions, and got prepared in every aspect he could consider. However, on their journey to Indonesia, Richard was informed of a death-threat e-mail from someone at the Batam Plant. Should he put himself and his team at risk to fulfill the integration?

This case tells how Richard and the Chinese team decided to act. After arriving at the plant, Richard (the integration team leader), Jack Chen (the newly appointed General Manager of the Batam Plant), and other team members implemented a series of transformational initiatives, such as conducting comprehensive communications, adjusting the organizational structure, making the plant operations more efficient and controllable, training the leadership of the local team, and dealing with the business crisis caused by the strikes organized by the trade unions.

This case study discusses the entrepreneurial story of FreshFresh Trade and Commerce (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. ("FreshFresh" for short), showing the continuous improvements and innovations it has made to develop a profitable model in the fresh food industry. At the end of 2013, its two founders, Leo (Bin) Shen and Baiyuan Fang, first got the idea of creating an online platform to provide fresh food. Since then, they have constantly tested the business model of FreshFresh. After two years of effort, its model became recognized by users and capital markets. By the end of June 2016, over 700,000 users have registered, and nearly 50% of them have purchased products on its platform at least once. The repeat purchase rate (at least twice) is around 45%. In March 2016, FreshFresh announced that it had raised US$20 million in Series A financing. On June 30, the company won the 2016 Top Digital award, making it the only fresh food e-commerce platform to win a prize at that year's innovation launch ceremony for China's telecommunication, media, and technology industries. However, just like 99% of companies in this sector, it has not yet managed to establish a profitable model. In 2015, it suffered losses of around ¥20 million, representing 20% of its operating revenue. After a series of improvements, the company hoped to make a profit in the first half of 2016, and to expand its business to other cities. But when Shen receives the performance report in July 2016, he decides to abandon this plan. He imagines fresh food e-commerce to be like running a marathon, and he wonders how FreshFresh can make a profit and achieve sound development by rationally allocating its strategic resources.

This case illustrates the challenges of Peter Wong, CEO of Dow Chemical Greater China, in locally implementing Dow's global sustainability strategy around 2016 when the mainland government has only recently begun to tackle its problems of pollution and corporate responsibility. Dow's 20-year journey to embedding sustainability in global corporate strategy is reviewed in some detail, illustrating the step-by-step process of aligning resources, transforming culture, and building external partnerships to enhance the possibility that sustainability strategies yield financial gains. The case challenges students to make sense of this corporate transformation, and subsequently assess the wisdom of continuing support for commercializing a total dust containment solution when an abrupt drop in the price of coal reduced the solution's financial attractiveness to future purchasers. To make recommendations about further support, students must consider the best ways to measure and interpret a sustainability strategy's impact.

Background note for product CB0028.

This case study describes how restaurant operator Wowprime, known for its brand creativity, implemented a diversification strategy in China's mainland. Having been present in the market for 14 years, Wowprime set out plans in August 2016 to expand from 149 restaurants to 1,000 by 2022. In a market where demand for customized offerings is gaining traction, should Wowprime maintain its fixed-menu-based diversification strategy for growth, or should it focus on core brands and priority markets? The case invites class participants to step into the shoes of Wowprime decision-makers and consider strategic options to achieve the 2022 goal while taking into account resource constraints as well as local market trends.

This case describes the process of Austrian chocolate producer Zotter Chocolate entering the Chinese market. There are several things that make this company stand out: it is a small, family-run entrepreneurial firm from Austria that makes a wide range of unconventional flavors of chocolate. It prides itself on being organic and fair trade, and has attracted many loyal customers and visitors to its "chocolate factory" in its headquarters in Bergl, Austria. After successfully entering the German market-an "obvious" target for a firm from Austria-the founder, Josef Zotter, and his family considered where to go next, in 2010. After comparing the U.S. and Chinese chocolate markets, Zotter Chocolate selected China as its first major non-European market. The case introduces how Zotter sought out a local partner in Shanghai and decided to enter the market with an "experience-based" offering in its first chocolate factory outside its home market, overseen by the founder's daughter Julia. Their innovations and learning process are also presented in the case. The case ends with Julia's key concerns about Zotter China's next step when she has to leave China for Zotter Chocolate's Austrian headquarters in August 2017.

This case describes how Opple Lighting, a leading company in China's lighting industry, developed its e-commerce business as online selling brought wholesale changes to the traditional market. Numerous questions emerged as the company embarked on its e-commerce journey. The gulf between online and traditional offline distribution channels in lighting meant that many management figures opposed the move, seeing it as a threat to long-established business lines. Opple's e-commerce team needed to find a way to gain recognition and business support from other departments. While flexible pricing is common in offline stores, price transparency is a defining feature of e-commerce. The next hurdle was ensuring that the e-commerce business avoided direct competition with offline channels. Traditional lighting fixtures are the result of long-term R&D and are subsequently produced in large quantities, whereas e-commerce products undergo rapid iteration and come in small batches. The final challenge for this department was to determine how to iterate new products and which distribution channels to use. The case chronicles the development of Opple's e-commerce business unit between 2012 and 2019. During this period, the team continuously optimized different links, including product development, production, manufacturing, logistics, warehousing, marketing and after-sales service. It also adjusted organizational structure, pursued an innovative talent management approach and improved its performance incentive system. The BU's efforts paid off as online sales rose to make up 30% of total revenue in 2019, up from 6.5% in 2003. E-commerce became a new growth driver for Opple. The BU also spearheaded changes in the company's working culture, structure and incentive system. In 2020, however, Opple witnessed a decline in both online profit and growth rates as competition intensified. What lessons can Opple draw from its journey into e-commerce to be better prepared for the future?

This case focuses on the distinctive "paternalistic" leadership and management style of Ren Zhengfei, founder of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Huawei") and considers whether he needed to adapt his style in light of new challenges at the company. Ren's own military experience shaped Huawei's early corporate culture and management structure. It emphasized clear-cut goals, hard-and-fast rules, employee dedication and absolute obedience. At the same time, the company acknowledged the contributions of dedicated employees by remunerating them generously. This approach transformed Huawei into a company of strivers and fueled rapid business growth. Nevertheless, as the market evolved and employee characteristics shifted, the shortcomings of Ren's management model grew ever apparent. Consequently, Huawei's performance took a nosedive and employee satisfaction also sank. Beset by internal and external challenges, Huawei needed to completely rethink its approach to business, corporate culture and company management.

This case series tells a story of post-merger integration, depicting a string of challenges faced by Guangxi LiuGong Machinery Co., Ltd. during its cross-border M&A. As a large SOE specialized in R&D, manufacturing and construction equipment sales, LiuGong was one of China's most internationalized companies, setting a prime example for local peers in the construction machinery sector with global aspirations. The case series comprises two parts: Case (A) and Case (B). Case (A) introduces the background of LiuGong's globalization strategy, summarizes the acquisition of the civil construction machinery division of Polish state-owned firm HSW as well as its wholly-owned subsidiary Dressta, and describes the integration process of LiuGong Poland, managed by former HR Director Teddy Wu, who was appointed General Manager of LiuGong Poland at a critical moment. China headquarters deployed him to Poland with a series of missions to carry out. After the acquisition, wholly-owned Dressta continued to operate independently, but its performance fell short of expectations, and a significant part of its operations overlapped with those of LiuGong Poland. One of the first major decisions Wu faced was to determine whether merging Dressta with LiuGong Poland was necessary.

Supplement to case CB0101 Case (B) describes Wu's new critical issue after the merger - whether or not to retain the former Dressta's President.

This case describes why and how Advantech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Advantech) has transformed in the age of the Internet of Things (IoT). Aware of the ecosystem attributes of the IoT industry and committed to the company's principle of altruism, Advantech strategically positioned itself as an "IoT platform provider" and an "enabler" of IoT applications. Since carrying out reforms in terms of its internal management, external cooperation, and development model, Advantech has evolved from an industrial computer maker into an IoT solution provider. Since the launch of the "co-creation model" at the end of 2016, Advantech has drawn attention from many excellent companies in traditional industries. With the Internet of Everything close at hand, Chairman KC Liu is well aware that there are many challenges to overcome as Advantech strives to build an industrial IoT ecosystem, the evolution continues. Case discussion will be carried out based on a three-step analysis of ecosystem strategy (seeing the ecosystem-choosing your position-winning the game) proposed by Ron Adner. Students will take a close look at the critical decisions made by Advantech as it made inroads into the IoT ecosystem as well as its organizational transformation and exploration as the company implemented strategic decisions. Through this case, students will not only learn about the latest developments of the emerging IoT industry, but will also gain a systematic understanding of "ecosystem strategy" and get to know a new corporate growth model called "co-creation."

Brian Patterson was the lead developer of a large office project in Moscow when the global financial crisis hit. His project, which had looked like it would be jaw-droppingly profitable just months before, was suddenly thrown into turmoil, and he faced trouble on all fronts. His local development partner wanted to sell in order to shore up its failing balance sheet, his world-class anchor tenant suddenly reneged on its pre-lease agreement, the contractor was running months behind schedule, and the project's bank was looking for any excuse to pull the construction loan. Just months earlier, the project pro forma had projected hundreds of millions of dollars in profit. Suddenly there were serious questions around whether the project could even be completed. And if it could, what rent and cap rate values could be assumed to determine if it made sense to continue development? Patterson needed to make some assumptions to determine whether or not to accept a sale offer that had been drudged up by his local partner. And if he decided to turn down the sale offer, he needed to find a way forward through a maze of (i) diverging interests amongst his partners and (ii) project development problems. As the economic and financial system faced global turmoil and threatened collapse, Patterson had to decide whether to keep developing the project - at significant risk to both the project and his personal career - or to sell for a modest profit and live to fight another day.

Organizations need to focus on how blockchain can be used to support their unique strategies. Without this focus, they risk investing in initiatives that don't provide meaningful value.

Rather than trying to sell standardized products or services to the biggest possible set of buyers, B2B companies need to develop ways to help specific customers achieve better outcomes. Instead of describing their solutions, companies first need to understand customers'specific challenges, objectives, operating practices, and competitive environment, then create offerings to deliver value within a customer's specific business context and culture.

How should companies launch products in times of uncertainty? Should they "wait and see"until uncertainty resolves -or commit to a full-scale launch and ride it out? Conventional wisdom says being early to market is the right choice, but that is not always the case. Many companies can benefit from a mixed, "act and see"approach.