On January 23, 2015, DXSD India received an opportunity to add a complex new line of business to the company’s value chain. The head of DXSD India, a shared service division of a U.K. bank, was concerned about his company’s ability to take on more complex work. Gaps had been identified in the existing process migration framework, so a new framework was proposed to fix the gaps. The new framework was not tested and did not yet have approval from the onshore project management office. DXSD India had two days to decide whether to use the existing way of working or pursue the proposed new framework. Would simple repairs of gaps within the current framework be sufficient to transform migrations or should a new framework be developed?

On January 23, 2015, DXSD India received an opportunity to add a complex new line of business to the company's value chain. The head of DXSD India, a shared service division of a U.K. bank, was concerned about his company's ability to take on more complex work. Gaps had been identified in the existing process migration framework, so a new framework was proposed to fix the gaps. The new framework was not tested and did not yet have approval from the onshore project management office. DXSD India had two days to decide whether to use the existing way of working or pursue the proposed new framework. Would simple repairs of gaps within the current framework be sufficient to transform migrations or should a new framework be developed?