The case describes Xiaomi's IPO application in 2018, which sheds light on the company's finances and indicates a rebound from declining sales two years ago to a period of strong international growth. It also reveals Xiaomi's revenue and profits from Internet services such as advertising and gaming on its MIUI user interface. Additionally, the case shows Xiaomi's performance on the global smartphone market, showing a good year-over-year growth as well as a maintained leading role in India market. On a way to become an "innovation leader", Xiaomi faces challenges such as the management of ecosystem partnership, and the global expansion especially into the high-stakes U.S. market.

This case describes the renewed growth of Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi in 2017, after suffering bruising setbacks at the hands of local competitors during the past two years. In 2017Q2, the company rejoined the top five rankings of the global smartphone market share. It also matched Samsung's market share in India market in 2017Q3. The case highlights the company's strategic adaptation in the two-year recalibration, with regards to global expansion, R&D accumulation and online business model redefinition. By releasing its own in-house developed chip, the case shows how Xiaomi attempts to fortify its intellectual property position and increase freedom of action in anticipation of entering new geographies, product markets, or technology areas. Besides, the case also presents the company's combination of the online and offline channels, by opening more than 200 Mi Home stores both in domestic and overseas. As Xiaomi embraced a new strategy to fuel growth, this case emphasizes Xiaomi's ecosystem strategy that seeks and invests partners in different niche markets with sizable market and strong user demand. In the end, the case questions the sustainability of the strategy and the internal organizational challenges facing Xiaomi.

Xiaomi, the Chinese smartphone company founded in 2010, had quickly become an industry leader in the Chinese market. By 2016 it had started to expand internationally, and this case lays out the company's globalization strategies and challenges moving forward. Hugo Barra, a top Android executive, had left Google a few years earlier to lead Xiaomi's international growth. Xiaomi's founder and CEO, Lei Jun, said the company's ultimate goal was "making good but cheap things," a low pricing strategy that had succeeded in China. The company sold over 70 million mobile phones in 2015-while aggressively building out a robust ecosystem. However, Xiaomi had expected to sell 80 to 100 million units that year; it was facing a declining domestic market and increased competition. Therefore, international expansion had become an important part of the company's overall strategy. But expanding to other countries would be a challenging road. For one, it would take considerable time and effort to tailor the company's Android-based MIUI operating system for diversified markets-and obtain market-access qualifications. Xiaomi's patent portfolio was thin compared to those of large competitors, and it ran the risk of lawsuits from companies that held patent rights in the countries it wanted to enter. Other challenges included building out sales channels, output capacity, and cross-culture management development. Xiaomi's international plan included ten countries in Asia, Europe, and Latin America. The next year or two would be critical for Xiaomi-and it needed to make the right strategic decisions to succeed in its globalization efforts.

This industry note provides an extensive overview of the wireless communications industry in China at the end of 2012. At the time China had over 1.1 billion mobile subscribers, and the country was predicted to have 500 million smartphones in use by the end of 2013. The note discusses the industry's value chain (carriers, device manufactures, component providers, content and applications providers, and telecom equipment providers), and the role of the Chinese government in the industry's evolution. The note also presents the strategic positioning and business models of China's three main carriers (China Mobile, China Unicorn, and China Telecom), and of the major international and domestic handset manufacturers, including Samsung, ZTE, Nokia, Apple, Lenovo and Huawei. In addition, the note covers the strategic positioning of the main chipset suppliers in the Chinese wireless market: Qualcomm, MediaTek, Samsung and Intel.