DriveU was a technology-enabled platform that provided verified drivers for a customer's personal vehicle. A smartphone application helped customers book and track the nearest available driver with all necessary information. The DriveU app was launched on June 29, 2015, with an initial investment of USD 1 million and ten employees. Later, they expanded to Chennai, Mumbai, Delhi, and Hyderabad. They also had a Driver Partner app for the use of drivers. Right from the first month of operations, they had positive unit economics. Starting in April 2022, DriveU actively expanding into other car owner services like car care, car service, motor insurance, and used car sales/buying through a super app. The case discusses DriveU's choices on expanding into new markets, penetrating markets that they are already present in, and/ or consolidating (with more services) in markets where they are dominant.
The case on Satyukt analyzes the platform business model in the context of Agriculture by capitalizing on remote sensing data and how the founders built up a successful business that benefits farmers, agri-business and insurance companies. The founders kickstarted the platform business solving one use case and acquired a set of users. Satyukt leveraged the data and the initial set of users further to solve additional use cases benefitting other players in the ecosystem. When used in a Platform Business Models course, this case can help students understand a key platform strategy called "coring". It can help draw attention to key focus areas in a business model which could be "cored" to derive more benefits that could expand the reach of the platform to varied set of players. Satyukt is also a classic example of the interplay of technology (data analytics) and platform business model. This could also segue into digital platforms that thrive on analytics.
This case is about the digital transformation at Apollo Hospitals (Chennai Main) facility. The case enumerates the various digitalization initiatives with the view to highlight how a successful digitalization project will result in all three possible outcomes - cost reduction/ efficiency improvement, product/ brand differentiation leading to high willingness to pay for the products and services, and improvement in patient/ consultant experience. Most digitalization initiatives would be focused on only one of these, but this case is an instance where there has been an equal focus on all these three outcomes.
The case on KNOLSKAPE traces the firm's evolution from a service provider of simulation games for academia to becoming a full-stack provider of customized products and learning journeys for corporations around the world. Through its growth journey, KNOLSKAPE had transformed from a typical pipeline business to a platform business model that integrates the value propositions provided by providers of technology, content, and service. The case is set in 2019-2020 when the business and learning worlds were disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the resultant shift to online learning. This case allows students to analyze KNOLSKAPE's platform architecture, including open-closed and proprietary-shared architectures, and globalization opportunities.
The case traces the digital journey of the Vikatan Group, a Tamil media conglomerate in India. The case can be used to build a process-based framework for ensuring organizational longevity, especially when the environment is dynamic. Vikatan faced a continuous onslaught of technological changes which at first sight are peripheral to the magazine publishing industry. However, these digital disruptions later became the defining media for news and entertainment. Vikatan made some decisions early on to follow where its customers went. It encouraged low stakes experiments with new technology. It ensured that the top management was open to inputs from the successes/failures of the experiments. Finally, it built flexibility into its organizational core to ensure that it successfully overcame the digital disruptions. The case provides the facts of this digital journey and helps the student identify how organizational longevity can be built into the firm through conscious strategic decision making.
In April 2020, Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (Jio), a subsidiary of Reliance Industries Limited, announced an alliance with social media giant Facebook Inc. (Facebook). This was the biggest foreign direct investment for a technology firm in India. The association between Jio and Facebook offered both firms many opportunities, and the strengths and core competencies of the two organizations promised to create value for Indian consumers and businesses by meeting their technology needs. However, the differences in the two organizations in terms of culture, expertise, business models, and management styles would need to be dealt with effectively to create the desired synergy. How could Jio ensure a co-operative and complementary partnership (despite their differences with Facebook) in order to succeed and set a precedent for future international alliances?
In April 2020, Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (Jio), a subsidiary of Reliance Industries Limited, announced an alliance with social media giant Facebook Inc. (Facebook). This was the biggest foreign direct investment for a technology firm in India. The association between Jio and Facebook offered both firms many opportunities, and the strengths and core competencies of the two organizations promised to create value for Indian consumers and businesses by meeting their technology needs. However, the differences in the two organizations in terms of culture, expertise, business models, and management styles would need to be dealt with effectively to create the desired synergy. How could Jio ensure a co-operative and complementary partnership (despite their differences with Facebook) in order to succeed and set a precedent for future international alliances?
The case on Siwggy, Foodora,and Yelp analyzes the hyperlocal food delivery business models that are popular in their respective markets. These multi-sided firms bring together local businesses such as restaurants and salons with their patrons through assistance in service discovery and delivery. This case elaborates how the foodtech space is evolving in countries such as India, Germany, and the United States, and how each of these hyperlocal platforms are adopting different strategies to sustain their business in their primary markets. When used as an introduction to multi-sided platforms, this case can help the student understand the hyperlocal space, the logistics challenges that food industry faces and how these delivery service platforms help address the same. This case also looks at what threats these platforms pose to its different sides and how envelopment possibilities emerge. It should help the students appreciate how a technology platform brings differentiation to the traditional food industry, and how a platform business model can provide significant competitive differentiation. By presenting three different hyperlocal platforms in as many geographies, the case study helps illustrate the commonality of business models while bringing forth the nuances of each market and its operational complexities.
Faircent is a leading P2P lending platform in India and this case study traces the evolution of the FinTech platform. It illustrates the myriad challenges the firm had to navigate while establishing a collateral free peer lending platform in the financial sector in the absence of established regulations. As a P2P marketplace in India, Faircent built out a full-fledged loan analytics platform by bringing onboard lenders and borrowers by providing them online tools to discover each other and transact. The case brings forth viewpoints from different platform sides such as the lenders and borrowers, along with an analysis on how the firm has shaped policy regulations by actively engaging with the central regulators. This case can be used to teach the basics of multi-sided platform business models, the different actors in the platform business along with the concepts of platform envelopment and the various strategic options for Multi-Sided Platforms (MSPs) to fight envelopment, including racing to acquire customers. It should help the students appreciate the platform business model and the competitive differentiation it can bring in.
The case study on HackerEarth traces the evolution of an open innovation management platform, the different enterprise issues related to innovation management or new product introduction that it could help address and the challenges that still persist when it comes to organizations embracing open innovation. The case also illustrates how a two-sided platform that started out with the recruitment assistance model evolved into one that could assist organizations to more seamlessly connect with external innovators who could help bring about breakthrough innovations. It helps the reader understand how the platform moved up the value chain by leveraging the same two sides, but by helping address higher order challenges wherein enterprises needed new ways of keeping up with the demands for innovation in products and services. The case can be used to teach the basics of multi-sided platform business models, the different actors in the platform business and the concept of network effects. It should help the students appreciate the differences between the pipeline and platform business models, and how a platform business model can bring in additional competitive differentiation to enterprises that leverage its services.
The case on Wipro BPO's Base)))TM highlights the critical decisions faced by service businesses as they develop products and platforms. This case elucidates the evolution of the Indian business process outsourcing (BPO) industry, Wipro's competitive position in the industry, and the architecture of the Base))) Suite of products. As Base))) began contributing to Wipro BPO's competitive advantage, the company had to make a few key decisions regarding product integration, verticalization, and network management in the context of Base))) Suite of products.
The director of marketing for Lawrence & Mayo (L&M) was reviewing the company’s results for the past financial year. Far from encouraging, the results were a reflection of an addition to the company’s existing product portfolio: accessories. L&M was an established name in the field of ophthalmic and optical instruments. The prestigious brand had maintained an exclusive positioning for over 100 years. When L&M launched premium watches under its existing brand, it took a bold step. The product was, no doubt, world class in quality and design. However, the company’s detractors wrote it off, calling it an attempt to ride two horses at the same time. Did the recent financial results vindicate these critics? The director of marketing wanted to comprehend the impact of the new product line, the reasons behind the poor performance and the way forward for L&M.