HCL Technologies was successfully leveraging Application Tracking System till 2017 to fast track its recruitment process, which contributed effectively till then. However, by 2017, as the strategic business objectives changed, HCL decided to implement advanced technology to create more intelligent recruitment system called Techruit. The new system had to meet the broader objectives of experience, efficiency and impact. The decision dilemmas in front of the core HR team were to choose the right technology for enhancing the effectiveness of talent acquisition process, and the right combination of metrics to measure and improve recruiter performance.

The case describes the growth trajectory of Vodafone Gujarat, one of the most successful circles of Vodafone India. Successive leaders of Vodafone Gujarat followed a highly entrepreneurial approach for building a market leadership position in urban and rural markets. The case provides a detailed description of how to execute growth strategies in the telecom sector, especially by designing a decentralized distribution structure, cementing first-mover advantage through trust, customizing products and services, and integrating with network rollout. The context of the rural market and bottom of pyramid customer segments makes this case relevant to other emerging economies.

In mid-2014, revenue market share of Vodafone Gujarat declined slightly ending decades of consistent growth. The cirlce had emerged as the market leader against some stiff competition from other leading players, viz. Airtel and Idea in one of key circles- Gujarat- in western India. Successive leaders had followed growth principles of superior network coverage, customer centricity, and innovation. The aggressive entrepreneurial approach was supported by autonomous structure. The new head of circle had the onerous task of arresting the decline and reviving local team.

The three cases provide a longitudinal account of the transformation of the Human Resource (HR) division of Mahindra's Automotive and Farm Equipment Sector (AFS). An aspirational nudge from the Managing Director about the need for a more strategic HR role triggered the transformation exercise. The follow-up diagnostic study revealed significant gaps in the readiness of the HR division for the future. The redesigned HR organisation with three pillars of Shared Services, HR Business Partners, and Centre of Excellence turned out to be quite successful. The efficiency improved, and HR gained a reputation for being a strategic partner to the business. With a high degree of standardised processes, the HR organisation seemed ready for digitisation. The three cases have been written in a way so as to provide the readers a detailed description of the diagnostic process in Case A, the restructuring and change process in Case B, and the impact of the transformation exercise in Case C.

This case describes the transformation of the HR organisation of Mahindra's AFS sector from 2013 to 2017. The CHRO and his team designed and implemented a blueprint aimed at enhancing the strategic role of HR. The migration from a traditional to a strategic role entailed anticipating and allaying apprehensions related to the change process. The case offers an opportunity to understand the interventions aimed at building and institutionalising new capabilities and making the change process acceptable to all stakeholders. Case C encapsulates the assessment of the transformation exercise from the perspective of the CHRO and the Managing Director.

This case describes the transformation of the HR organisation of Mahindra's AFS sector from 2013 to 2017. The CHRO and his team designed and implemented a blueprint aimed at enhancing the strategic role of HR. The migration from a traditional to a strategic role entailed anticipating and allaying apprehensions related to the change process. The case offers an opportunity to understand the interventions aimed at building and institutionalising new capabilities and making the change process acceptable to all stakeholders. Case C encapsulates the assessment of the transformation exercise from the perspective of the CHRO and the Managing Director.

At the turn of mid-2000, the news industry saw a tectonic shift in the reading habits of people, driven by developments in digital technology. News industry's traditional business model of relying on advertisement income was majorly disrupted. This led to a steep decline in revenues from the print business. The case describes the strategy and organisation-building initiatives of a leading newspaper in India as it transitioned from a print newspaper media ecosystem to a digital news ecosystem. Anant Goenka, a third-generation member of the family, led the digital foray. While Anant created a USD 20 million digital business in four years, the path towards the next goal of achieving a topline of USD 150 million in the next seven to eight years was not clear. Furthermore, it might entail transforming the Indian Express Group, with close to 90 years of legacy of strong editorial ideologies, to adapt and embrace the rules of the game of the digital ecosystem. This case presents an excellent opportunity to learn the nature and extent of challenges involved in building and scaling up a digital news business, including the transition from a traditional newspaper business.

The three cases (Case A: JSW Steel's Ispat Acquisition: The Opportunity; Case B: JSW Steel's Ispat Acqusition: The Setback & Case C: JSW Steel's Ispat Acquisition: The Turnaround Strategy) describe the business situation leading to acquisition of Ispat by JSW, the acquirer company's failure to realize synergies post-acquisition, and the subsequent turnaround initiatives to salvage the situation. In 2010, JSW Steel, a 14 mtpa Indian steel company acquired Ispat Steel with annual production capacity of 3 mtpa. The acquisition was part of JSW's multipronged strategy to realize its aspiration of being a 40 mtpa firm. At the time of acquisition, Ispat had huge debts, a long pipeline of unfinished projects, high production costs and unpredictable cash flows. Its main plant, Dolvi was shutdown for 45 days. However, the plant also had numerous advantages. It was located near the seashore and was technologically very advanced. Case A describes the events leading to acquisition of Ispat by JSW. It captures the facts, opinions and inferences around the acquisition decision, which were used as inputs in the due diligence process to assess synergies between JSW and Ispat. The case describes the economic, competitive, and industry factors prevailing in 2010 when JSW was thinking of acquiring Ispat.

The three cases (Case A: JSW Steel's Ispat Acquisition: The Opportunity; Case B: JSW Steel's Ispat Acqusition: The Setback & Case C: JSW Steel's Ispat Acquisition: The Turnaround Strategy) describe the business situation leading to acquisition of Ispat by JSW, the acquirer company's failure to realize synergies post-acquisition, and the subsequent turnaround initiatives to salvage the situation. In 2010, JSW Steel, a 14 mtpa Indian steel company acquired Ispat Steel with annual production capacity of 3 mtpa. The acquisition was part of JSW's multipronged strategy to realize its aspiration of being a 40 mtpa firm. At the time of acquisition, Ispat had huge debts, a long pipeline of unfinished projects, high production costs and unpredictable cash flows. Its main plant, Dolvi was shutdown for 45 days. However, the plant also had numerous advantages. It was located near the seashore and was technologically very advanced. Case A describes the events leading to acquisition of Ispat by JSW. It captures the facts, opinions and inferences around the acquisition decision, which were used as inputs in the due diligence process to assess synergies between JSW and Ispat. The case describes the economic, competitive, and industry factors prevailing in 2010 when JSW was thinking of acquiring Ispat.

The three cases (Case A: JSW Steel's Ispat Acquisition: The Opportunity; Case B: JSW Steel's Ispat Acqusition: The Setback & Case C: JSW Steel's Ispat Acquisition: The Turnaround Strategy) describe the business situation leading to acquisition of Ispat by JSW, the acquirer company's failure to realize synergies post-acquisition, and the subsequent turnaround initiatives to salvage the situation. In 2010, JSW Steel, a 14 mtpa Indian steel company acquired Ispat Steel with annual production capacity of 3 mtpa. The acquisition was part of JSW's multipronged strategy to realize its aspiration of being a 40 mtpa firm. At the time of acquisition, Ispat had huge debts, a long pipeline of unfinished projects, high production costs and unpredictable cash flows. Its main plant, Dolvi was shutdown for 45 days. However, the plant also had numerous advantages. It was located near the seashore and was technologically very advanced. Case A describes the events leading to acquisition of Ispat by JSW. It captures the facts, opinions and inferences around the acquisition decision, which were used as inputs in the due diligence process to assess synergies between JSW and Ispat. The case describes the economic, competitive, and industry factors prevailing in 2010 when JSW was thinking of acquiring Ispat.